Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.73

Six Fields of Contact (3rd)

Tatiyachaphassāyatanasutta — Migajālavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse
Speakers
The Buddha declaring and questioning; the same unnamed mendicant confessing and answering
Form
SN 35.71-72's own opening repeated a third time, then the three-characteristics catechism (permanent? suffering? self?) already met at SN 35.32, closing on this project's own full liberation formula and this vagga's own colophon and uddāna
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — the catechism and the closing colophon both reward careful attention

Why this discourse

This discourse closes both the “Six Fields of Contact” triad (SN 35.71–73) and Migajālavagga itself, escalating a third time: where SN 35.71 asked whether the mendicant wrongly self-identifies with each field (answered “no”) and SN 35.72 asked whether he rightly does not (answered “yes”), this discourse drops the self-view formula's own direct question entirely and instead runs the three-characteristics catechism already met at SN 35.32, closing Sabbavagga: permanent or impermanent? suffering or happiness? fit to be regarded as self? — closing on this project's own full standard liberation formula (disillusionment, fading desire, freedom, the declaration that rebirth is ended) rather than either of the narrower closings SN 35.71–72 used. Beyond the discourse itself, this file's own closing lines carry a colophon reading “Migajālavaggo dutiyo” — “Migajālavagga is the second” — confirming, as this project's own established pattern (SN 22.52, SN 35.52, SN 35.62) predicts, that this vagga is the second vagga of Saḷāyatanasaṃyutta's own second paṇṇāsaka, opened by Avijjāvagga at SN 35.53 and continuing here. The closing uddāna, left untranslated in Sujato's own English exactly as at SN 35.62, names all eleven discourses in order — two with Migajāla, four with Samiddhi, Upasena, Upavāṇa, and three on the six fields of contact — confirming this reading guide's own discourse-by-discourse count.

Reading guide

A third catechism: permanent, suffering, self

The same three-question form SN 35.32 already used to close Sabbavagga — is the eye (and each remaining field) permanent or impermanent? if impermanent, suffering or happiness? if impermanent and suffering, fit to be regarded as self? — here recast onto the six fields of contact, closing this triad's own third and final escalation.

The full liberation formula, restored

Unlike SN 35.71's own “end of suffering” and SN 35.72's own “no more future lives,” this discourse closes on the complete sequence: disillusionment, fading desire, freedom, the knowledge of that freedom, and the standard declaration that rebirth is ended.

A colophon confirming the second fifty's own second vagga

This file's own closing colophon, “Migajālavaggo dutiyo” (“Migajālavagga is the second”), confirms — following the same pattern already established at SN 22.52, SN 35.52, and SN 35.62 — that this vagga is the second vagga of Saḷāyatanasaṃyutta's own second paṇṇāsaka, immediately after Avijjāvagga opened it at SN 35.53.

Eleven discourses, named in verse

This file's own closing uddāna names all eleven discourses of this vagga in order — two with Migajāla, four with Samiddhi, Upasena, Upavāṇa, and three on the six fields of contact — left untranslated in Sujato's own English exactly as at SN 35.62, so this reading guide describes rather than quotes its content.

Key terms

anicca — impermanent — the first question in this discourse's own three-part catechism
vipariṇāmadhamma — liable to change, perishable — part of the catechism's own third question
nibbindati — grows disillusioned — the first link in this project's own familiar liberation sequence
paṇṇāsaka — a fifty — this vagga's own colophon confirms it is the second vagga of Saḷāyatanasaṃyutta's own second one
uddāna — a mnemonic summary verse — this file's own closing verse, naming all eleven discourses of this vagga

The text

The complete discourse: the same opening declaration and confession as SN 35.71-72, then the three-characteristics catechism closing on this project's own full standard liberation formula. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, anyone who doesn’t truly understand the six fields of contact’s origin, disappearance, gratification, drawback, and escape has not completed the spiritual journey and is far from this teaching and training.” When he said this, one of the mendicants said to the Buddha, “Here, sir, I’m discouraged, really discouraged. For I don’t truly understand the six fields of contact’s origin, disappearance, gratification, drawback, and escape.”

§2“What do you think, mendicant? Is the eye permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” “But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?” “Suffering, sir.” “But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” “No, sir.”

§3“Is the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” “But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?” “Suffering, sir.” “But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” “No, sir.”

§4“Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind. Being disillusioned, desire fades away. When desire fades away they’re freed. When they’re freed, they know they’re freed. They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What three-question catechism does this discourse use, matching an earlier discourse in this book?
Correct: A. The three-characteristics catechism, not the direct self-view questions of SN 35.71-72.
Question 2 of 6
Which earlier discourse in Book IV already used the identical three-question form?
Correct: A. The same catechism this project already met closing this book's own third vagga.
Question 3 of 6
What formula closes this discourse, unlike SN 35.71-72's own narrower closings?
Correct: A. The complete sequence, restored after two narrower closings.
Question 4 of 6
What does this discourse's own vagga colophon, “Migajālavaggo dutiyo,” confirm about this vagga's own position?
Correct: A. Following directly after Avijjāvagga opened the second paṇṇāsaka at SN 35.53.
Question 5 of 6
How many discourses make up Migajālavagga, confirmed by its own closing uddāna?
Correct: A. Matching this reading guide's own discourse-by-discourse count across SN 35.63-73.
Question 6 of 6
Which four named individuals does this vagga's own closing uddāna group its eleven discourses around?
Correct: A. The same four figures this reading guide has traced discourse by discourse.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0