Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 42.1

Fury

Caṇḍasutta — Gāmaṇivagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
Caṇḍo ('Fury'), a chief, questioning the Buddha directly
Form
A direct question, answered with a single three-part cause repeated for both outcomes
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — opens this saṃyutta with a short, direct exchange

Why this discourse

This discourse opens Book IV's eighth saṃyutta with a chief (gāmaṇi) named Caṇḍa — “Fury” — asking the Buddha directly why some people are known as furious and others as gentle. The Buddha's own answer names the identical cause for both, stated twice in mirror form: greed, hate, and delusion, present or absent. Caṇḍa becomes a lay follower on the spot, the closing pattern most of this saṃyutta's own discourses will share.

Reading guide

One cause, two mirrored outcomes

The same three roots — greed, hate, and delusion — explain both fury and gentleness: present, they cause someone to get annoyed and show it; absent, the identical situation produces no annoyance at all. Nothing external distinguishes the furious from the gentle; only the presence or absence of the three roots does.

A chief named for the very trait at issue

Caṇḍa's own name means “fierce, furious” — whether coincidence or a deliberate narrative touch, his own question about the cause of fury is asked by someone whose own name names that very quality.

Key terms

caṇḍo... sorato — “furious... gentle” — the two contrasting reputations this discourse's own question asks about
rāgo, doso, moho appahīno — “greed, hate, and delusion not given up” — the shared cause of fury, restated three times for each root in turn
pare kopenti — “they get annoyed by others” — the specific behavior this discourse traces to the three unabandoned roots
saraṇaṁ gacchāmi — “I go for refuge” — Caṇḍa's own closing declaration, the formula most discourses in this saṃyutta will share
upāsakaṁ maṁ bhagavā dhāretu — “may the Buddha remember me as a lay follower” — the standard closing request for lay commitment

The text

The complete discourse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. Then Fury the chief went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him: “What is the cause, sir, what is the reason why some people are regarded as furious, while others are regarded as gentle?” “Take someone who hasn’t given up greed. So they get annoyed by others, and they show it. They’re regarded as furious. They haven’t given up hate. So they get annoyed by others, and they show it. They’re regarded as furious. They haven’t given up delusion. So they get annoyed by others, and they show it. They’re regarded as furious. This is the cause, this is the reason why some people are regarded as furious. But take someone who has given up greed. So they don’t get annoyed by others, and don’t show it. They’re regarded as gentle. They’ve given up hate. So they don’t get annoyed by others, and don’t show it. They’re regarded as gentle. They’ve given up delusion. So they don’t get annoyed by others, and don’t show it. They’re regarded as gentle. This is the cause, this is the reason why some people are regarded as gentle.” When he said this, Fury the chief said to the Buddha, “Excellent, sir! Excellent! As if he were righting the overturned, or revealing the hidden, or pointing out the path to the lost, or lighting a lamp in the dark so people with clear eyes can see what’s there, the Buddha has made the teaching clear in many ways. I go for refuge to the Buddha, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha. From this day forth, may the Buddha remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
What single cause does the Buddha name for both fury and gentleness?
Correct: A. The identical three roots explain both outcomes, mirrored rather than treated as separate causes.
Question 2 of 3
What is notable about the questioner's own name in this discourse?
Correct: A. Whether coincidence or deliberate touch, the questioner shares a name with the trait under discussion.
Question 3 of 3
How does this discourse end?
Correct: A. The refuge-taking formula that will close most discourses in this saṃyutta.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0