Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 44.1

With Khemā

Khemāsutta — Abyākatavagga

Setting
Toraṇavatthu, between Sāvatthī and Sāketa, then Sāvatthī itself
Speakers
The nun Khemā and King Pasenadi of Kosala, then King Pasenadi and the Buddha
Form
A king's question, answered identically by a disciple and by the Buddha himself — this book's own first discourse with a genuine narrative frame since SN 41's own Cittasaṃyutta
Length
~4 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — a rich narrative, straightforward argument

Why this discourse

This discourse opens Book IV's tenth and last saṃyutta with a king unable to find a worthy renunciant to honor, until he is directed to the nun Khemā — herself praised as “astute, competent, clever, learned, a brilliant speaker, and eloquent” before he even meets her. His question — does a realized one still exist after death? — is the first of this saṃyutta's own central concern, the four undeclared theses about a realized one after death, and Khemā's own ocean simile for why the question cannot be answered is confirmed, when the king later puts the same question to the Buddha directly, to match his own answer word for word.

Reading guide

A king's search ends with a nun

Sent to find any worthy ascetic or brahmin in Toraṇavatthu, the king's own man finds none — only the nun Khemā, already staying there. Her own reputation (astute, clever, learned, eloquent) is established before she speaks a single word in the discourse itself.

Four questions, one answer repeated four times

Does a realized one still exist after death, no longer exist, both, or neither? Khemā's own answer to all four is identical: “this has not been declared by the Buddha” — not evasion but a direct citation of the Buddha's own settled position, confirmed rather than her own opinion.

An ocean no reckoner can measure

Asked why, Khemā first asks the king whether any accountant could count the Ganges' own grains of sand, or the ocean's own gallons of water — both impossible, “deep, immeasurable, and hard to fathom” — then applies the identical description to a realized one: any of the five aggregates by which one might be described “has been cut off at the root, made like a palm stump” — the four theses about existence after death simply do not apply to something no longer describable in those terms at all.

The king hears his own answer, twice over

Confirmed by reading the source directly: when King Pasenadi later asks the Buddha the identical questions, he receives the identical answer, word for word — his own closing exclamation (“how the meaning and the phrasing of the teacher and the disciple fit together…without contradiction”) is not flattery but an observed fact he reports twice over in the same breath.

Key terms

na kho etaṁ, mahārāja, bhagavatā byākataṁ — “great king, this has not been declared by the Buddha” — Khemā's own identical answer to all four questions about a realized one after death
gambhīro appameyyo duppariyogāḷho — “deep, immeasurable, and hard to fathom” — the ocean's own description, applied identically to a realized one freed from reckoning by the five aggregates
rūpasaṅkhāya vimutto — “freed from reckoning in terms of form” — the key phrase this discourse repeats for each of the five aggregates in turn, form through consciousness
acchariyaṁ, bhante, abbhutaṁ, bhante — “it's incredible, sir, it's amazing!” — the king's own closing exclamation on finding the teacher and the disciple's own words identical
khemā bhikkhunī — the nun Khemā — introduced by reputation before she speaks, this project's own first named female teacher to answer a king's own direct question

The text

The complete discourse, organized under section headings. The Buddha's own repetition of Khemā's exact words to the king is elided in the source itself and is not restated here as separate text, only described in the reading guide above. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The setting: a king seeks someone to honor

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. Now at that time the nun Khemā was wandering in the land of the Kosalans between Sāvatthī and Sāketa when she took up residence in Toraṇavatthu. Then King Pasenadi was traveling from Sāketa to Sāvatthī, and he too stayed in Toraṇavatthu for a single night. Then King Pasenadi addressed a man, “Please, my friend, check if there’s a suitable (male) ascetic or brahmin in Toraṇavatthu to whom I can pay homage.” “Yes, Your Majesty,” replied that man. He searched all over Toraṇavatthu, but he couldn’t see a suitable ascetic or brahmin for the king to pay homage to. But he saw that the nun Khemā was staying there, so he went to the king and said to him, “Your Majesty, there’s no (male) ascetic or brahmin in Toraṇavatthu for the king to pay homage to. But there is the nun Khemā, who’s a disciple of the Blessed One, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha. She has a good reputation as being astute, competent, clever, learned, a brilliant speaker, and eloquent. Your Majesty may pay homage to her.”

Four questions on a realized one after death

§2Then King Pasenadi of Kosala went up to the nun Khemā, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to her: “Ma’am, does a realized one still exist after death?” “Great king, this has not been declared by the Buddha.” “Well then, does a realized one no longer exist after death?” “This too has not been declared by the Buddha.” “Well then, does a realized one both exist and not exist after death?” “This has not been declared by the Buddha.” “Well then, does a realized one neither exist nor not exist after death?” “This too has not been declared by the Buddha.”

Why: the cause, illustrated by grains of sand and the ocean

§3“Ma’am, when asked these questions, you say that this has not been declared by the Buddha. What’s the cause, what’s the reason why this has not been declared by the Buddha?” “Well then, great king, I’ll ask you about this in return, and you can answer as you like. What do you think, great king? Do you have any accountant or finger-tallier or reckoner who can count the grains of sand in the Ganges, that is, how many grains of sand there are, how many hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands of grains of sand?” “No, ma’am.” “Do you have any accountant or finger-tallier or reckoner who can count the water in the ocean, that is, how many gallons of water there are, how many hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands of gallons of water?” “No, ma’am. Why is that? Because the ocean is deep, immeasurable, and hard to fathom.” “In the same way, great king, any form by which a realized one might be described has been cut off at the root, made like a palm stump, obliterated, and unable to arise in the future. A realized one is freed from reckoning in terms of form. They’re deep, immeasurable, and hard to fathom, like the ocean. To say that after death, a realized one still exists, or no longer exists, or both still exists and no longer exists, or neither still exists nor no longer exists: none of these apply.

The same freedom, for all five aggregates

§4Any feeling … perception … choices … consciousness by which a realized one might be described has been cut off at the root, made like a palm stump, obliterated, and unable to arise in the future. A realized one is freed from reckoning in terms of consciousness. They’re deep, immeasurable, and hard to fathom, like the ocean. To say that after death, a realized one still exists, or no longer exists, or both still exists and no longer exists, or neither still exists nor no longer exists: none of these apply.” Then King Pasenadi approved and agreed with what the nun Khemā said. Then he got up from his seat, bowed, and respectfully circled her, keeping her on his right, before leaving.

The king asks the Buddha, and hears his own answer echoed

§5Then on a later occasion King Pasenadi of Kosala went up to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. He asked the Buddha exactly the same questions he had asked the nun Khemā, and received the same answers. He said, “It’s incredible, sir, it’s amazing! How the meaning and the phrasing of the teacher and the disciple fit together and agree without contradiction when it comes to the chief matter! This one time I went to the nun Khemā and asked her about this matter. And she explained it to me with these words and phrases, just like the Buddha. It’s incredible, sir, it’s amazing! How the meaning and the phrasing of the teacher and the disciple fit together and agree without contradiction when it comes to the chief matter! Well, now, sir, I must go. I have many duties, and much to do.” “Please, great king, go at your convenience.” Then King Pasenadi approved and agreed with what the Buddha said. Then he got up from his seat, bowed, and respectfully circled him, keeping him on his right, before leaving.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

4 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 4
Who does King Pasenadi first put his question to, before asking the Buddha directly?
Correct: A. A renunciant whose own reputation (astute, clever, learned, eloquent) is established before she speaks a single word.
Question 2 of 4
What simile does Khemā use to explain why the four theses about a realized one after death go undeclared?
Correct: A. Both impossible tasks, both "deep, immeasurable, and hard to fathom" — the identical description then applied to a realized one.
Question 3 of 4
What happens when King Pasenadi later asks the Buddha the same four questions?
Correct: A. Confirmed rather than merely claimed — the king reports the match twice over in the same breath of astonishment.
Question 4 of 4
Why, according to Khemā, do the four theses about a realized one after death not apply?
Correct: A. Freed from reckoning by form, feeling, perception, choices, or consciousness — none of the four theses has anything left to describe.
Answered 0 of 4 · Correct 0