Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 47.7

A Monkey

Makkaṭasutta — Ambapālivagga

Setting
Not specified in the source
Speakers
The Buddha, telling a fable to the mendicants
Form
A complete animal fable, followed by the same doctrinal application as SN 47.6
Length
2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — a vivid fable, structurally paired with the previous discourse

Why this discourse

A foolish, reckless monkey, straying into the shared territory where hunters set tar snares, grabs the tar with one hand to free himself, then another hand, then each foot, then his snout — becoming stuck at all five points and falling prey to the hunter. The Buddha applies this fable with the identical closing teaching already met at SN 47.6: the five kinds of sensual stimulation are “the domain of others,” while the four kinds of mindfulness meditation are a mendicant's own territory.

Reading guide

Three kinds of terrain, only one shared

The discourse's own opening confirms three distinct kinds of Himalayan terrain: regions neither monkeys nor humans can reach, regions monkeys alone can reach, and level, pleasant places BOTH can reach — it is only in this last, shared territory that hunters set their snares, confirming the danger arises specifically where the monkey's own domain overlaps with human territory.

Struggling at five points, not just one

Confirmed by direct reading, the monkey's own escalating struggle — freeing one hand only by grabbing with another, then a foot, then the other foot, then his own snout — ends with him “trapped at five points,” a specific and vivid image of compounding entanglement rather than a single act of carelessness.

The identical closing application as SN 47.6

This discourse's own closing sections (§3-4) are confirmed by direct comparison to be worded almost identically to SN 47.6's own equivalent closing sections — the same five kinds of sensual stimulation named “the domain of others,” and the same four kinds of mindfulness meditation named a mendicant's own territory — confirming this saṃyutta's own use of a shared closing template across multiple animal-fable discourses.

Key terms

himavato pabbatarājassa — “the Himalayas, king of mountains” — the setting for this discourse's own fable
bālajātiko lolajātiko — “foolish and reckless” — the discourse's own description of the one monkey who approaches the tar, contrasted with the “not foolhardy and reckless” monkeys who avoid it
pañcoḍḍito — “trapped at five points” — the monkey's own final, fully entangled state, after each attempt to free himself only adds another point of capture
agocare carati paravisaye — “roams out of his own territory into the domain of others” — the shared closing formula, worded identically to SN 47.6's own equivalent line
pañca kāmaguṇā... cattāro satipaṭṭhānā — “the five kinds of sensual stimulation... the four kinds of mindfulness meditation” — the identical pairing of “domain of others” and “own territory” already met at SN 47.6

The text

The complete discourse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1 — three kinds of terrain“Mendicants, in the Himalayas there are regions that are rugged and impassable. In some such regions, neither monkeys nor humans can go, while in others, monkeys can go but not humans. There are also level, pleasant places where both monkeys and humans can go. There hunters set snares of tar on the monkey trails to catch the monkeys.

§2 — the monkey trapped at five pointsThe monkeys who are not foolhardy and reckless see the tar and avoid it from afar. But a foolish and reckless monkey goes up to the tar and grabs it with a hand. He gets stuck there. Thinking to free his hand, he grabs it with his other hand. He gets stuck there. Thinking to free both hands, he grabs it with a foot. He gets stuck there. Thinking to free both hands and foot, he grabs it with his other foot. He gets stuck there. Thinking to free both hands and feet, he grabs it with his snout. He gets stuck there. And so the monkey, trapped at five points, just lies there screeching. He’d meet with tragedy and disaster, and the hunter can do what he wants with him. The hunter spears him on that very banana tree, pries him off, and goes wherever he wants. That’s what happens when you roam out of your territory into the domain of others.

§3 — "the domain of others": the five kinds of sensual stimulationSo, mendicants, don’t roam out of your own territory into the domain of others. If you roam out of your own territory into the domain of others, Māra will find a vulnerability and get an opportunity. And what is not a mendicant’s own territory but the domain of others? It’s the five kinds of sensual stimulation. What five? Sights known by the eye, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. Sounds known by the ear … Smells known by the nose … Tastes known by the tongue … Touches known by the body, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. This is not a mendicant’s own territory but the domain of others.

§4 — "a mendicant's own territory": the four kinds of mindfulness meditationYou should roam inside your own territory, the domain of your fathers. If you roam inside your own territory, the domain of your fathers, Māra won’t find a vulnerability and get an opportunity. And what is a mendicant’s own territory, the domain of the fathers? It’s the four kinds of mindfulness meditation. What four? It’s when a mendicant meditates by observing an aspect of the body—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. They meditate observing an aspect of feelings … mind … principles—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. This is a mendicant’s own territory, the domain of the fathers.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
In this discourse's own opening, where specifically do hunters set their tar snares?
Correct: A. Confirming the danger arises specifically where the monkey's own domain overlaps with human territory.
Question 2 of 3
How does the monkey's struggle escalate in this discourse's own fable?
Correct: A. A vivid image of compounding entanglement rather than a single act of carelessness.
Question 3 of 3
How does this discourse's own closing application compare to SN 47.6's own equivalent section?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct comparison — this saṃyutta reuses a shared closing template across multiple animal-fable discourses.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0