Reading guide
Three factors, or four: a genuine disagreement
Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse preserves a real disagreement rather than resolving it neatly: Godhā's own answer omits ethical conduct entirely, naming only the three confidences, while Mahānāma's own answer includes all four factors already familiar from this saṃyutta's own recurring formula.
Neither claims final authority
Confirmed by direct reading, Godhā's own response to Mahānāma is not a concession but a redirection: “hold on…only the Buddha would know whether or not they have these things” — an explicit acknowledgment that lay disciples, however confident, defer to the Buddha's own final determination on this specific question.
A repeated report, and a genuinely new final exchange
Confirmed by direct reading of the root Pali, Mahānāma repeats the entire prior exchange to the Buddha verbatim — segments this discourse's own English source leaves empty, since they duplicate content already translated. What follows is genuinely new: Mahānāma declares that even if the Buddha's own side in a legal dispute stood against the entire fourfold assembly and the whole world, he would still side with the Buddha — and Godhā has nothing but approval for this declaration.
Key terms
The text
§1At Kapilavatthu. Then Mahānāma the Sakyan went up to Godhā the Sakyan, and said to her, “Godhā, how many things must an individual have for you to recognize them as a stream-enterer, not liable to be reborn in the underworld, assured, destined for awakening?” “Mahānāma, an individual must have three things for me to recognize them as a stream-enterer. What three? It’s when a noble disciple has experiential confidence in the Buddha … the teaching … and the Saṅgha … When an individual has these three things I recognize them as a stream-enterer.
§2But Mahānāma, how many things must an individual have for <em>you</em> to recognize them as a stream-enterer?” “Godhā, an individual must have four things for me to recognize them as a stream-enterer. What four? It’s when a noble disciple has experiential confidence in the Buddha … the teaching … the Saṅgha … And they have the ethical conduct loved by the noble ones … leading to immersion. When an individual has these four things I recognize them as a stream-enterer.” “Hold on, Mahānāma, hold on! Only the Buddha would know whether or not they have these things.” “Come, Godhā, let’s go to the Buddha and inform him about this.” Then Mahānāma and Godhā went to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. Mahānāma told the Buddha all that had happened, and then said:
A test of loyalty“Sir, some instigation of a legal proceeding might come up. The Buddha might take one side, and the Saṅgha of monks the other. I’d side with the Buddha. May the Buddha remember me as having such confidence. Some instigation of a legal proceeding might come up. The Buddha might take one side, and the Saṅgha of monks and the Saṅgha of nuns the other. … The Buddha might take one side, and the Saṅgha of monks and the Saṅgha of nuns and the laymen the other. … The Buddha might take one side, and the Saṅgha of monks and the Saṅgha of nuns and the laymen and the laywomen the other. … The Buddha might take one side, and the Saṅgha of monks and the Saṅgha of nuns and the laymen and the laywomen and the world—with its gods, Māras, and divinities, this population with its ascetics and brahmins, gods and humans—the other. I’d side with the Buddha. May the Buddha remember me as having such confidence.” “Godhā, what do you have to say to Mahānāma when he speaks like this?” “Sir, I have nothing to say to Mahānāma when he speaks like this, except what is good and wholesome.”
Self-check quiz
3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.