Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 55.40

Nandiya the Sakyan

Nandiyasakkasutta — Puññābhisandavagga

Setting
Kapilavatthu, the Banyan Tree Monastery
Speakers
The Buddha and Nandiya the Sakyan
Form
A probing question, a firm correction, then two matched causal chains
Length
3–4 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★★★ — closes Vagga 4 (10 discourses), confirmed by direct reading of the colophon and uddāna, with a precise causal chain distinguishing a noble disciple's own negligence from diligence

Why this discourse

Confirmed by direct reading of its own root colophon (“Puññābhisandavaggo catuttho”) and uddāna, this discourse closes Vagga 4 at ten discourses, matching this project's own SN 55.31-40 exactly. Nandiya asks whether a noble disciple totally lacking the four factors “would live negligently” — a question the Buddha firmly redirects, since such a person is not a noble disciple at all, before giving a precise causal chain for how a genuine noble disciple can still live negligently or diligently, depending on contentment alone versus continued effort.

Reading guide

A firm correction before any answer

Confirmed by direct reading, the Buddha does not accept Nandiya's own premise: someone “totally and utterly” lacking the four factors “stands outside in the faction of ordinary persons” — the question of negligence or diligence applies only to those who already possess the factors, not to someone who lacks them entirely.

Negligence: contentment with what is already had

Confirmed by direct reading, the Buddha's own precise causal chain for negligence begins with mere “content[ment] with that confidence” and no further effort “for solitude by day or retreat by night” — leading step by step through absent joy, absent rapture, absent tranquility, suffering, an unimmersed mind, and finally principles that “do not become clear.”

Diligence: the identical chain, reversed by continued effort

Confirmed by direct reading, the diligent version differs at exactly one point: rather than being content and stopping, the disciple is “not content…and make[s] a further effort” — from which joy, rapture, tranquility, bliss, immersion, and finally clarity about principles all follow in the identical sequence but reversed in direction.

A single variable determining two opposite outcomes

This project's own reading of the discourse's own structure: the entire difference between negligence and diligence in this discourse hinges on a single variable — whether the disciple stops at contentment with the four factors alone, or continues making effort beyond them — not on possessing the factors themselves, which both outcomes already share.

Key terms

ekaṁsena bāhirakapakkhe ṭhito, tamahaṁ vadāmi — “stands outside in the faction of ordinary persons, I say” — the Buddha's own firm redirection of Nandiya's own premise
tāya ca pasādena tuṭṭho hoti, na uttari vāyamati divā pavivekāya rattiṁ paṭisallānāya — “content with that confidence, and don't make a further effort for solitude by day or retreat by night” — the single condition marking negligence
na tāya ca pasādena tuṭṭho hoti, uttari ca vāyamati — “not content with that confidence…and make a further effort” — the same condition reversed, marking diligence instead
appamattassa dhammā pātubhavanti — “because principles have become clear, they're reckoned to live diligently” — the diligent chain's own final link
puññābhisandavaggo catuttho — “the Overflowing-Merit chapter, the fourth [ends]” — the root colophon's own vagga-closing marker

The text

Every genuinely translated fragment given in the consulted English source. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Sakyans, near Kapilavatthu in the Banyan Tree Monastery. Then Nandiya the Sakyan went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him: “Sir, if a noble disciple were to totally and utterly lack the four factors of stream-entry, would they live negligently?” “Nandiya, someone who totally and utterly lacks these four factors of stream-entry stands outside in the faction of ordinary persons, I say. Neverthless, Nandiya, as to how a noble disciple lives negligently and how they live diligently, listen and apply your mind well, I will speak.” “Yes, sir,” Nandiya replied. The Buddha said this:

The chain of negligence“And how does a noble disciple live negligently? Firstly, a noble disciple has experiential confidence in the Buddha … They’re content with that confidence, and don’t make a further effort for solitude by day or retreat by night. When they live negligently, there’s no joy. When there’s no joy, there’s no rapture. When there’s no rapture, there’s no tranquility. When there’s no tranquility, there’s suffering. When one is suffering, the mind does not become immersed in samādhi. When the mind is not immersed in samādhi, principles do not become clear. Because principles have not become clear, they’re reckoned to live negligently. Furthermore, a noble disciple has experiential confidence in the teaching … the Saṅgha … And they have the ethical conduct loved by the noble ones … leading to immersion. They’re content with that ethical conduct loved by the noble ones, and don’t make a further effort for solitude by day or retreat by night. When they live negligently, there’s no joy. When there’s no joy, there’s no rapture. When there’s no rapture, there’s no tranquility. When there’s no tranquility, there’s suffering. When one is suffering, the mind does not become immersed in samādhi. When the mind is not immersed in samādhi, principles do not become clear. Because principles have not become clear, they’re reckoned to live negligently. That’s how a noble disciple lives negligently.

The chain of diligenceAnd how does a noble disciple live diligently? Firstly, a noble disciple has experiential confidence in the Buddha … But they’re not content with that confidence, and make a further effort for solitude by day and retreat by night. When they live diligently, joy springs up. Being joyful, rapture springs up. When the mind is full of rapture, the body becomes tranquil. When the body is tranquil, they feel bliss. And when blissful, the mind becomes immersed in samādhi. When the mind is immersed in samādhi, principles become clear. Because principles have become clear, they’re reckoned to live diligently. Furthermore, a noble disciple has experiential confidence in the teaching … the Saṅgha … And they have the ethical conduct loved by the noble ones … leading to immersion. But they’re not content with that ethical conduct loved by the noble ones, and make a further effort for solitude by day and retreat by night. When they live diligently, joy springs up. Being joyful, rapture springs up. When the mind is full of rapture, the body becomes tranquil. When the body is tranquil, they feel bliss. And when blissful, the mind becomes immersed in samādhi. When the mind is immersed in samādhi, principles become clear. Because principles have become clear, they’re reckoned to live diligently. That’s how a noble disciple lives diligently.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
How does the Buddha respond to Nandiya's own initial premise about someone totally lacking the four factors?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — a firm redirection before any substantive answer is given.
Question 2 of 3
What single variable determines whether a noble disciple, who already has the four factors, lives negligently or diligently?
Correct: A. This project's own reading of the discourse's own structural hinge — one variable, two opposite chains.
Question 3 of 3
What does this discourse's own root colophon confirm about Vagga 4?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading of the root Pali colophon, not assumed.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0