Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 56.21

At the Village of Koṭi (1st)

Paṭhamakoṭigāmasutta — Koṭigāmavagga

Setting
Koṭigāma, a village in the land of the Vajjis
Speaker
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly, closing in verse
Form
A prose statement, then a closing verse pair restating the same claim
Length
1–2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★★ — opens Vagga 3 at an actual named place, and this vagga's own first discourse to close in verse rather than prose alone

Why this discourse

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse opens Vagga 3 at Koṭigāma, an actual named village in the land of the Vajjis, with the Buddha declaring that both he and the mendicants have wandered through birth after birth for such a long time specifically because of not understanding and not penetrating the four noble truths — a claim restated once more in a closing verse pair, this vagga's own first use of gāthā.

Reading guide

A named place, after two vaggas without one

This project's own reading: SN 56.1-20 gave no setting at all, or only “At Sāvatthī” without further detail; this discourse instead names Koṭigāma specifically, in the land of the Vajjis — the same region this project recognizes from elsewhere in the canon as significant in the Buddha's own final journey.

Not knowing named as the cause of wandering

This project's own reading: the claim here is causal, not merely descriptive — not understanding the four truths is named as the specific reason for the long wandering through saṃsāra, a formula this project recognizes as a recurring stock statement elsewhere in the wider canon, without claiming a specific verified cross-reference here.

Key terms

catunnaṁ ariyasaccānaṁ ananubodhā appaṭivedhā — “due to not understanding and not penetrating four noble truths” — this discourse's own named cause of long wandering
dīghamaddhānaṁ sandhāvitaṁ saṁsaritaṁ mamañceva tumhākañca — “both you and I have wandered and transmigrated for such a very long time” — notably including the Buddha's own past, before his own awakening
ucchinnā bhavataṇhā, khīṇā bhavanetti; natthi dāni punabbhavo — “craving for continued existence has been cut off; the leash to existence is ended; now there'll be no more future lives” — this discourse's own closing claim of finality
bhavanetti — “the leash to existence” — a vivid image of craving as a tether pulling one back into further birth
paṭhamaṁ — “the first” — this discourse's own root text confirming its own position directly, read rather than assumed

The text

Every genuinely translated fragment given in the consulted English source, including its own closing verse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Vajjis at the village of Koṭi. There the Buddha addressed the mendicants: “Mendicants, due to not understanding and not penetrating four noble truths, both you and I have wandered and transmigrated for such a very long time.

§2What four? The noble truths of suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the practice that leads to the cessation of suffering. These noble truths of suffering, origin, cessation, and the path have been understood and comprehended. Craving for continued existence has been cut off; the leash to existence is ended; now there’ll be no more future lives.”

§3That is what the Buddha said. Then the Holy One, the Teacher, went on to say:

Verse“Because of not truly seeing the four noble truths, we have transmigrated for a long time from one rebirth to the next. But now that these truths have been seen, the leash to existence is eradicated. The root of suffering is cut off, now there’ll be no more future lives.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
What does this discourse name as the specific cause of both the Buddha's own and the mendicants' own long wandering through saṃsāra?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — this discourse's own explicitly stated causal claim.
Question 2 of 3
How does this discourse's own setting differ from most of SN 56.1-20, per this project's own reading?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — a named, specific place after two vaggas largely without one.
Question 3 of 3
What formal feature does this discourse introduce to this vagga, per this project's own reading?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — verse closing a discourse that opens in prose.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0