Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 56.7

Thoughts

Vitakkasutta — Samādhivagga

Setting
Not given — continuing directly from SN 56.6's own setting
Speaker
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
A direct prohibition, its own reason given, then a direct instruction, its own reason given
Length
<1 minute to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★ — the seventh of ten discourses, this vagga's own turn to direct instruction about the content of thought itself

Why this discourse

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse marks a turn in this vagga's own opening sequence: rather than making a claim about who comprehends the four truths (as SN 56.1-6 did), it directly instructs against three named categories of unskillful thought — sensual, malicious, and cruel — and directly instructs toward thinking of the four truths instead, each instruction accompanied by its own stated reason.

Reading guide

Three named unskillful thoughts

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse names exactly three kinds of thought to avoid: sensual (kāma), malicious (byāpāda), and cruel (vihiṁsā) — a standard threefold grouping this project notes recurs elsewhere in the canon as the three wrong resolves, opposite to the three right resolves of right intention.

A reason given on both sides

This project's own reading: unlike SN 56.1-6, which stated their own claims without argument, this discourse gives an explicit reason for both the prohibition and the instruction — unskillful thoughts do not lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, or extinguishment; thinking of the four truths does.

Key terms

mā...pāpake akusale vitakke vitakkeyyātha — “don't think bad, unskillful thoughts” — this discourse's own opening prohibition
kāmavitakkaṁ, byāpādavitakkaṁ, vihiṁsāvitakkaṁ — “sensual, malicious, and cruel thoughts” — the three named categories, a standard grouping elsewhere paired with the three right resolves
nibbidāya...virāgāya...nirodhāya...upasamāya...abhiññāya...sambodhāya...nibbānāya — “disillusionment... dispassion...cessation...peace...insight...awakening... extinguishment” — the sevenfold benefit this discourse's own reasoning turns on
vitakkentā...vitakkeyyātha — “when you think, you should think [of the four truths]” — this discourse's own positive instruction
sattamaṁ — “the seventh” — this discourse's own root text confirming its own position directly, read rather than assumed

The text

Every genuinely translated fragment given in the consulted English source. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, don’t think bad, unskillful thoughts, such as sensual, malicious, and cruel thoughts. Why is that? Because those thoughts aren’t beneficial or relevant to the fundamentals of the spiritual life. They don’t lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment.

§2When you think, you should think: ‘This is suffering’ … ‘This is the origin of suffering’ … ‘This is the cessation of suffering’ … ‘This is the practice that leads to the cessation of suffering’. Why is that? Because those thoughts are beneficial and relevant to the fundamentals of the spiritual life. They lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment.

§3That’s why you should practice meditation …”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
What three kinds of thought does this discourse instruct against?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — a standard threefold grouping, opposite to the three right resolves.
Question 2 of 3
How does this discourse's own structure differ from SN 56.1-6, per this project's own reading?
Correct: A. This project's own reading of a structural turn within this vagga's own opening sequence.
Question 3 of 3
What sevenfold benefit does this discourse's own reasoning turn on?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — the standard sevenfold formula this discourse cites as its own reason.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0