Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 7.2

With Bhāradvāja the Rude

Akkosasutta

Setting
Near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove
Speakers
The brahmin Akkosaka Bhāradvāja ("Bhāradvāja the Rude") and the Buddha
Form
A hostile confrontation, a household simile, a verse, and a conversion
Length
~4.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — one of the canon's most frequently cited similes on how to receive hostility

Why this discourse

This discourse follows directly from SN 7.1's conversion with the news reaching another member of the same clan: a different brahmin, known here simply as Bhāradvāja the Rude, hears that a kinsman has joined the Buddha's order and arrives already furious, hurling abuse before any exchange of words has even happened. The Buddha's response doesn't counter insult with insult; it asks a simple domestic question about hospitality — if a guest declines the food you offer, whose food is it still? — and builds from that everyday logic one of the most widely cited similes in the entire canon for how to receive hostility without being changed by it.

Reading guide

Anger arriving before any actual exchange

Unlike SN 7.1, where the brahmin at least states his grievance in verse before the confrontation proper begins, Bhāradvāja the Rude arrives already abusing the Buddha with harsh language, provoked purely by rumor — the hostility here is immediate rather than built up through dialogue.

A question about hospitality, not retaliation

The Buddha's first move isn't to answer the insults directly; it's to ask about something entirely ordinary — whether guests still visit, whether food is still offered — establishing a shared, uncontroversial premise before applying it to the situation at hand.

A gift that stays with the giver when refused

The simile's logic is precise: if an offered gift isn't accepted, it remains the giver's own possession, not something transferred against the receiver's will — applied to insult, this means abuse simply not taken up stays entirely with the one who offered it.

A refrain repeated for emphasis, not elaborated further

‘It still belongs to you, brahmin’ is stated twice in immediate succession, the discourse trusting repetition rather than additional argument to make the point land, a rhetorical choice distinct from the single unrepeated images used elsewhere in this saṃyutta.

A verse on not returning anger, framed as victory

The closing verses don't simply counsel patience for its own sake; they frame not retaliating as winning ‘a battle hard to win’, and go further to note that people ignorant of the teaching mistake the one who heals both sides of a conflict for a fool — anticipating and naming the very misreading such restraint invites.

Key terms

asabbhāhi pharusāhi vācāhi akkosati paribhāsati — “abused and insulted him with rude, harsh words” — the brahmin's opening hostility, arriving before any exchange.
sace te nappaṭiggaṇhanti, kassa taṁ hoti — “if they don't accept it, whose is it?” — the simile's central question, drawn from ordinary hospitality.
tavevetaṁ, brāhmaṇa, hoti — “it still belongs to you, brahmin” — the refrain repeated twice, applying the simile directly to the insults just spoken.
akkodhassa kuto kodho — “whence anger for one free of anger?” — the opening line of the Buddha's responding verse.
saṅgāmaṁ jeti dujjayaṁ — “you win a battle hard to win” — framing the refusal to retaliate as victory, not mere passivity.

The text

The discourse in full. A short passage repeating earlier material verbatim is left blank in the source and is not reconstructed here. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground. The brahmin Bhāradvāja the Rude heard a rumor that a brahmin of the Bhāradvāja clan had gone forth from the lay life to homelessness in the presence of the ascetic Gotama. Angry and displeased he went to the Buddha and abused and insulted him with rude, harsh words. When he had spoken, the Buddha said to him: “What do you think, brahmin? Do friends and colleagues, relatives and kin, and guests still come to visit you?” “Sometimes they do, worthy Gotama.” “Do you then serve them with fresh and cooked foods and savories?” “Sometimes I do.” “But if they don’t accept it, brahmin, who does it belong to?” “In that case it still belongs to me.” “In the same way, brahmin, when you abuse, harass, and attack us who do not abuse, harass, and attack, we don’t accept it. It still belongs to you, brahmin, it still belongs to you!

§2Someone who, when abused, harassed, and attacked, abuses, harasses, and attacks in return is said to eat the food and have a reaction to it. But we neither eat your food nor do we have a reaction to it. It still belongs to you, brahmin, it still belongs to you!” “The king and his retinue believe of the worthy Gotama, ‘the ascetic Gotama is a perfected one’. And yet he still gets angry.”

§3“Whence anger for one free of anger, tamed, living justly, freed by right knowledge, peaceful and unaffected?

§4When you get angry at an angry person you just make things worse for yourself. When you don’t get angry at an angry person you win a battle hard to win.

§5When you know that the other is angry, you act for the good of both yourself and the other if you’re mindful and stay calm.

§6People inexpert in the teaching consider one who heals both oneself and the other to be a fool.”

§7When he had spoken, Bhāradvāja the Rude said to the Buddha, “Excellent, worthy Gotama! … I go for refuge to the worthy Gotama, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha. Sir, may I receive the going forth, the ordination in the worthy Gotama’s presence?” And the brahmin Bhāradvāja the Rude received the going forth, the ordination in the Buddha’s presence. Not long after his ordination, Venerable Bhāradvāja the Rude, living alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute, soon realized the supreme end of the spiritual path in this very life. He lived having achieved with his own insight the goal for which gentlemen rightly go forth from the lay life to homelessness. He understood: “Rebirth is ended; the spiritual journey has been completed; what had to be done has been done; there is nothing further for this place.” And Venerable Bhāradvāja became one of the perfected.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What prompts Bhāradvāja the Rude to confront the Buddha?
Correct: A. Provoked purely by rumor, arriving already hostile.
Question 2 of 10
How does the confrontation begin, compared to SN 7.1?
Correct: A. Hostility here is immediate rather than built up through dialogue.
Question 3 of 10
What is the Buddha's first move in response to the abuse?
Correct: A. Establishing a shared, uncontroversial premise before applying it.
Question 4 of 10
What is the logic of the Buddha's central simile?
Correct: A. Applied to insult: abuse not taken up stays with the one who offered it.
Question 5 of 10
How many times is the refrain "it still belongs to you, brahmin" repeated?
Correct: A. Repetition rather than additional argument drives the point home.
Question 6 of 10
How does the closing verse frame not retaliating against anger?
Correct: A. Framing restraint as victory, not mere passivity.
Question 7 of 10
According to the verse, how do people ignorant of the teaching view someone who heals both sides of a conflict?
Correct: A. The verse anticipates and names this very misreading of restraint.
Question 8 of 10
How does Bhāradvāja the Rude respond to the Buddha's teaching?
Correct: A. A conversion following the same pattern as SN 7.1.
Question 9 of 10
What does Bhāradvāja the Rude achieve after his ordination?
Correct: A. The same outcome as the brahmin in SN 7.1.
Question 10 of 10
What point does the king and his retinue raise about the Buddha, according to the brahmin?
Correct: A. A challenge the Buddha's verse directly answers by describing what true freedom from anger looks like.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0