Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 7.8

With Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper

Aggikasutta

Setting
Near Rājagaha, at Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper's home, during the Buddha's alms round
Speakers
The brahmin Aggika Bhāradvāja ("Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper") and the Buddha
Form
An alms encounter, a verse exchange redefining a key term, and a pointed refusal
Length
~3.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A parallel exists in the Sutta Nipāta's Bhāradvāja discourses, and a rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — layered, redefining a major Vedic concept and closing with a famous refusal

Why this discourse

This discourse catches the Buddha mid-almsround, standing silently at the door of a brahmin preparing a fire sacrifice with milk-rice. The brahmin's opening verse offers him the food, but conditionally — only one accomplished in the three Vedic knowledges and good birth deserves to eat it. The Buddha's answer performs a quiet redefinition: the ‘three knowledges’ he claims for himself aren't the Vedic scriptures at all, but three specific insights — memory of past lives, seeing beings' rebirth according to their deeds, and the ending of rebirth itself. And when the brahmin, persuaded, then offers the meal, the Buddha refuses it on a different ground entirely: food given in exchange for a verse recited over it isn't food a Buddha eats.

Reading guide

An encounter that begins without either party seeking it

Unlike this vagga's other discourses, no one comes looking for the Buddha here; he simply appears on his ordinary alms round, and the brahmin, already engaged in sacrificial preparation, is the one who initiates the verse exchange upon seeing him standing at the door.

Conditional hospitality, offered on Vedic terms

The brahmin's opening verse isn't hostile; it's a genuine offer, but hedged with qualification — only someone of good birth, ample learning, and the three knowledges may eat this milk-rice, terms drawn entirely from traditional brahminical qualification.

Three knowledges, quietly redefined

The Buddha's reply doesn't reject the framework of ‘three knowledges’ outright; it keeps the form and replaces the content — not Vedic learning, but memory of past lives, seeing where beings are reborn according to their deeds, and the ending of rebirth itself, the three insights traditionally associated with the night of awakening.

An offer accepted in principle, then refused on separate grounds

The brahmin, persuaded by the redefinition, offers the meal — and the Buddha's refusal isn't about worthiness at all; it turns on a different principle entirely, that food given specifically in exchange for a recited verse isn't food the Buddhas accept, regardless of who's offering it.

Merit redirected, not simply declined

The discourse doesn't end with a bare refusal; the Buddha redirects the brahmin toward serving that same food to any consummate one with defilements ended, naming such a person ‘the field for the seeker of merit’ — the refusal reframing rather than simply rejecting the brahmin's generosity.

Key terms

tīhi vijjāhi sampanno — “accomplished in the three knowledges” — the brahmin's opening qualification, drawn from Vedic learning.
pubbenivāsaṁ yo vedī — “one who knows their past lives” — the first of the Buddha's redefined three knowledges.
saggāpāyañca passati — “sees heaven and places of loss” — the second redefined knowledge, seeing beings reborn according to their deeds.
jātikkhayaṁ patto — “attained the ending of rebirth” — the third redefined knowledge, completing the Buddhist reinterpretation of tevijjā.
gāthābhigītaṁ me abhojaneyyaṁ — “food enchanted by a verse isn't fit for me to eat” — the Buddha's refusal, on grounds separate from the brahmin's own qualification.

The text

The discourse in full. The closing conversion formula, identical to the preceding discourses in this vagga, is elided in the source and is not reconstructed here. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground. Now at that time ghee and milk-rice had been set out for the brahmin Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper, who thought, “I will serve the sacred flame! I will perform the fire sacrifice!”

§2Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Rājagaha for alms. Wandering indiscriminately for almsfood in Rājagaha, he approached Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper’s home and stood to one side. Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper saw him standing for alms and addressed him in verse:

§3“One who’s accomplished in the three knowledges, of good birth and ample learning, accomplished in knowledge and conduct may enjoy this milk-rice.”

§4“Even one who mutters many prayers is no brahmin by birth if they’re filthy and corrupt within, with a following gained by fawning.

§5One who knows their past lives, sees heaven and places of loss, and has attained the ending of rebirth, is a sage of perfect insight. Because of these three knowledges a brahmin is a master of the three knowledges. Accomplished in knowledge and conduct, they may enjoy this milk-rice.”

§6“May the worthy Gotama eat! The worthy one is a brahmin.”

§7“Food enchanted by a verse isn’t fit for me to eat. That’s not the principle of those who see, brahmin. The Buddhas cast aside things enchanted with verses. Since there is such a principle, brahmin, that’s how they live.

§8Serve with other food and drink the consummate one, the great seer, with defilements ended and remorse stilled. For he is the field for the seeker of merit.”

§9When he had spoken, the brahmin Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper said to the Buddha, “Excellent, worthy Gotama! …” … And Venerable Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper became one of the perfected.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does this encounter begin, compared to other discourses in this vagga?
Correct: A. No one comes looking for the Buddha here; the brahmin initiates the exchange upon seeing him.
Question 2 of 10
What condition does the brahmin's opening verse place on eating the milk-rice?
Correct: A. Terms drawn entirely from traditional brahminical qualification.
Question 3 of 10
How does the Buddha's reply treat the framework of "three knowledges"?
Correct: A. A quiet redefinition rather than an outright rejection.
Question 4 of 10
What is the first of the Buddha's redefined three knowledges?
Correct: A. Pubbenivāsaṁ yo vedī — the first of three insights associated with the night of awakening.
Question 5 of 10
What is the third of the Buddha's redefined three knowledges?
Correct: A. Jātikkhayaṁ patto — completing the Buddhist reinterpretation of tevijjā.
Question 6 of 10
How does the brahmin respond once persuaded by the Buddha's redefinition?
Correct: A. Persuaded, he extends the offer he had originally hedged with conditions.
Question 7 of 10
On what grounds does the Buddha refuse the offered food?
Correct: A. A separate principle from the qualification debate that preceded it.
Question 8 of 10
What does the Buddha redirect the brahmin to do instead?
Correct: A. Reframing the offer rather than simply rejecting the brahmin's generosity.
Question 9 of 10
What later collection contains a parallel to this discourse?
Correct: A. A cluster of related fire-sacrifice-brahmin encounters appears there as well.
Question 10 of 10
What outcome does Bhāradvāja the Fire-Worshiper reach after this exchange?
Correct: A. The same conversion-to-arahantship arc as the discourses before it.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0