Udāna · Discourse 1.2

Upon Awakening (2nd)

Dutiyabodhisutta

Setting
The same spot as Ud 1.1 — Uruvelā, root of the tree of awakening, bank of the Nerañjarā River — the same seven days just concluded
Speaker
The Buddha, alone; again no interlocutor or audience is named
Theme
The second watch of the same night: dependent origination reviewed “against the grain” — how the whole chain, and the suffering built on it, ceases
Length
< 1 minute to read
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — a direct companion to Ud 1.1, best read alongside it

The other half of a single night

Ud 1.1 and Ud 1.2 are not two separate teachings so much as two views of one. Same night, same seat beneath the same tree, same twelve links — but where the first watch traced how suffering is built up, the second watch, examined here, traces how the very same structure comes apart. Reading the pair together is close to the point.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

In the second part of the same night described in Ud 1.1, the Buddha reviews dependent origination in reverse — tracing how the cessation of ignorance leads, link by link, to the cessation of the entire mass of suffering — and expresses a heartfelt sentiment about having known “the end of conditions.”

The same seven days, a different watch

The narrative opening is word-for-word the same as Ud 1.1: the Buddha, newly awakened, at Uruvelā, at the root of the tree of awakening, on the Nerañjarā’s bank, has just completed seven unmoving days “experiencing the bliss of freedom.” The only change in the frame is precise and easy to miss on a fast read: this time it is “the second part of the night,” and the Buddha applies his mind to dependent origination “going against the grain” rather than with it. The Udāna is telling us, in effect, that this is the direct continuation of the episode just given — the same sitting, examined from its other side.

Dependent origination, “against the grain”

Where Ud 1.1 built the chain up — ignorance conditioning choices, choices conditioning consciousness, and so on to old age and death — this review takes it apart in the same order, link by link: “when ignorance ceases, choices cease. When choices cease, consciousness ceases,” and onward until “when rebirth ceases, old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress cease.” This is not a separate insight bolted onto the first; it is the necessary implication of it. Anything that arises through specific, traceable conditions must, when those conditions are removed, cease as well. Nothing mysterious is added at this second stage — only the same causal picture read in the direction that makes liberation conceivable at all.

The heartfelt saying: “the end of conditions”

The verse opens with the same two lines as Ud 1.1’s — “when things become clear to the keen, meditating brahmin” — before diverging in its final line: here the brahmin’s doubts are dispelled not simply because he understands “each thing and its cause,” as in Ud 1.1, but because “he’s known the end of conditions.” The shared opening and the small, exact shift in the closing line reward a side-by-side reading: two nearly identical utterances, differing only where the content genuinely differs.

Reading Ud 1.1 and Ud 1.2 together

Taken on its own, this discourse could look like simple repetition. Read as the second half of a matched pair, it is doing something more deliberate: establishing that the arising and the ceasing of suffering are two aspects of a single seamless structure, not two different doctrines. The forward chain shows why suffering is not accidental; the reverse chain shows why it is not permanent. Ud 1.3, which follows immediately, will bring both directions together into a single review — making this pair the first two-thirds of an opening triad that anchors the entire collection.

Key terms

paṭiloma — “against the grain”: the reverse direction of the twelve-link chain, tracing cessation rather than arising, reviewed in this discourse.
nirodha — “cessation”: the governing idea of this discourse’s entire review, applied in turn to each of the twelve links.
“the second part of the night” — the only substantive change in the narrative frame from Ud 1.1, marking this as a direct continuation of that scene.
the shared verse-opening — Ud 1.1 and Ud 1.2 open their closing verses with identical lines, diverging only in the final line — a small, exact signal of their relationship.
dependent cessation — the principle that whatever arises through specific conditions ceases when those conditions are removed — the logical complement to dependent origination.

The text

The discourse in full: the setting, the complete reverse chain of dependent origination, and the closing verse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The setting

§1So I have heard. At one time, when he was first awakened, the Buddha was staying in Uruvelā at the root of the tree of awakening on the bank of the Nerañjarā River. There the Buddha sat cross-legged for seven days without moving, experiencing the bliss of freedom. When seven days had passed, the Buddha emerged from that state of immersion. In the second part of the night, he carefully applied the mind to dependent origination, going against the grain:

Dependent origination, against the grain

§2“When this doesn’t exist, this doesn’t come to be; due to the cessation of this, this ceases. That is:
When ignorance ceases, choices cease.
When choices cease, consciousness ceases.
When consciousness ceases, name and form cease.
When name and form cease, the six sense fields cease.
When the six sense fields cease, contact ceases.
When contact ceases, feeling ceases.
When feeling ceases, craving ceases.
When craving ceases, grasping ceases.
When grasping ceases, continued existence ceases.
When continued existence ceases, rebirth ceases.
When rebirth ceases, old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress cease.
That is how this entire mass of suffering ceases.”

The heartfelt saying

§3Then, understanding this matter, on that occasion the Buddha expressed this heartfelt sentiment:

§4“When things become clear
to the keen, meditating brahmin,
his doubts are dispelled,
since he’s known the end of conditions.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is the setting of this discourse, compared to Ud 1.1?
Correct: B. The narrative frame repeats Ud 1.1’s almost word for word.
Question 2 of 10
During which part of the night does the Buddha review dependent origination this time?
Correct: B. Ud 1.1 covers the first part of the night; this discourse covers the second.
Question 3 of 10
In which direction does the Buddha apply his mind this time?
Correct: B. The text explicitly says “going against the grain.”
Question 4 of 10
According to the cessation chain, what happens when ignorance ceases?
Correct: B. “When ignorance ceases, choices cease” opens the reverse chain.
Question 5 of 10
What is said to happen when grasping ceases?
Correct: B. The chain runs: grasping ceases → continued existence ceases → rebirth ceases.
Question 6 of 10
How does the text summarize the result of the entire cessation chain?
Correct: A. This is the mirror image of Ud 1.1’s summary line.
Question 7 of 10
How do the first two lines of Ud 1.2’s closing verse compare to Ud 1.1’s?
Correct: B. The shared opening highlights the pair’s close relationship.
Question 8 of 10
What does Ud 1.2’s verse say the brahmin has come to know, differing from Ud 1.1’s ending?
Correct: B. This is the one line where the two verses genuinely diverge.
Question 9 of 10
What best describes the structural relationship between Ud 1.1 and Ud 1.2?
Correct: B. Same site, same seven days, same twelve links — reviewed forward, then backward.
Question 10 of 10
Like Ud 1.1, this discourse opens with what phrase, marking it as transmitted testimony?
Correct: B. The standard opening formula of the recited discourses.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0