Reading guide
The teaching in one sentence
A brahmin who practices murmuring the mystic syllable “huṁ, huṁ” asks the Buddha what defines a brahmin, and receives a verse whose very first specific quality is explicitly not murmuring that syllable — redefining the term around inner qualities rather than ritual utterance.
A different tree, a new visitor
The setting has shifted slightly from the previous three discourses: still Uruvelā, still on the bank of the Nerañjarā, but now at “the goatherd’s banyan tree” rather than the tree of awakening itself — another notable spot in the same area that the tradition elsewhere associates with the Buddha’s earliest post-awakening period. The seven days of stillness are mentioned again, suggesting this scene, too, belongs to that same general stretch of time, even if the discourse itself doesn’t specify exactly how many days had passed since Ud 1.1–1.3.
An ascetic who murmurs “huṁ, huṁ”
The brahmin who approaches is identified by a specific, almost incidental detail: he is “one of those who murmured the mystic syllable huṁ, huṁ” — evidently a recognizable ascetic practice or affectation of the time, though the text doesn’t explain further what it was meant to accomplish. After ordinary greetings, he asks the question that will recur through this entire stretch of the chapter: “How do you define a brahmin? And what are the things that make one a brahmin?”
The verse’s answer: moral qualities, not muttering
The Buddha’s verse answers with unmistakable precision, naming this brahmin’s own practice directly: a true brahmin has “banished bad qualities,” is “not murmuring the mystic syllable huṁ,” and is “unstained, self-controlled, a complete knowledge master who has completed the spiritual journey,” with “no pretensions about anything in the world.” The specificity is the point — this isn’t a generic redefinition offered in the abstract, but one that names and sets aside exactly the practice the questioner had just been engaged in.
The first of a six-discourse thread
What follows this discourse in the Udāna’s first chapter is a sustained return to the same question across five more discourses — a group of senior monks called “brahmins” by the Buddha, Mahākassapa’s deliberate almsround among the poor, a taunting spirit, a former wife’s visit, and a company of ritual bathers — each approaching “who is a true brahmin” from a completely different scene. Ud 1.4 sets the terms for that whole run: brahmin-hood, in every one of these six discourses, will be argued not from birth or ritual but from what a person actually is.
Key terms
The text
The setting
§1So I have heard. At one time, when he was first awakened, the Buddha was staying in Uruvelā at the goatherd’s banyan tree on the bank of the Nerañjarā River. There the Buddha sat cross-legged for seven days without moving, experiencing the bliss of freedom. When seven days had passed, the Buddha emerged from that state of immersion.
A brahmin's question
§2Then a certain brahmin, one of those who murmured the mystic syllable huṁ, huṁ, went up to the Buddha and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he stood to one side and said, “Worthy Gotama, how do you define a brahmin? And what are the things that make one a brahmin?”
The heartfelt saying
§3Then, understanding this matter, on that occasion the Buddha expressed this heartfelt sentiment:
§4“Any brahmin who has banished bad qualities—
not murmuring the mystic syllable huṁ, unstained, self-controlled,
a complete knowledge master who has completed the spiritual journey—
they may legitimately proclaim the divine doctrine;
who have no pretensions about anything in the world.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.