Udāna · Heartfelt Sayings 3.6

With Pilindavaccha

Pilindavacchasutta

Setting
Near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground
Speakers
The Buddha, several complaining mendicants, and Venerable Pilindavaccha
Form
A complaint, a summons, and the Buddha’s explanation drawn from Pilindavaccha’s past lives, closing with a four-line verse
Length
~2 minutes to read
Chapter
Sixth discourse of the Nandavagga, the third chapter of the Udāna (Ud 3.1–3.10)
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — a short, self-contained story

Why this discourse, sixth of the Nandavagga

A monk keeps calling his fellow mendicants “lowlifes,” and the complaint that reaches the Buddha could easily become a lesson in correcting harsh speech. Instead, the discourse takes a stranger route: it traces the habit back five hundred lifetimes and asks what it actually means to call someone, rightly or wrongly, a “brahmin.”

Reading guide

A monk’s harsh word

Venerable Pilindavaccha has a habit of addressing the other mendicants as “lowlifes” (vasala) — a term of open contempt, historically the kind of word a brahmin might use for someone considered beneath them. Several mendicants find this offensive enough to report it to the Buddha, who summons Pilindavaccha and asks him directly whether it’s true. Pilindavaccha doesn’t deny it: “Yes, sir.”

The Buddha’s unusual defense: habit, not hatred

Rather than correcting Pilindavaccha’s speech on the spot, the Buddha applies his mind to Pilindavaccha’s past lives and reports what he finds to the other mendicants: “he doesn’t address the mendicants as ‘lowlifes’ out of hate” — rather, “for five hundred lives without interruption he was reborn in a brahmin family,” and has simply carried the habitual manner of address that long. The explanation reframes what looked like present unkindness as an old, deeply worn groove of speech, persisting well past whatever inner hostility might once have produced it.

The verse: what actually makes a brahmin

The closing verse doesn’t mention Pilindavaccha’s habit again; instead it redefines the very identity his old speech pattern invoked. “In whom dwells no deceit or conceit, rid of greed, unselfish, with no need for hope, with anger cast aside, quenched: they are a brahmin, an ascetic, a mendicant.” The three titles are offered as equivalent, all resting on the same inner qualities rather than birth. Placed right after a story about a habit rooted in five hundred lifetimes of brahmin birth, the verse’s point lands with some force: birth explains the habit, but it is not what earns the title.

Key terms

vasala — “lowlife” — a term of contempt, traditionally associated with brahmin condescension toward those considered of lower status; Pilindavaccha’s habitual address for the other mendicants.
“applied his mind to… past lives” — the specific ability the Buddha exercises here to trace Pilindavaccha’s speech habit to its origin, rather than addressing it as a present-life fault alone.
five hundred lives — the span the text gives for Pilindavaccha’s uninterrupted rebirth in a brahmin family — the source, per the Buddha, of his habitual manner of speech.
“not out of hate” — the Buddha’s explicit clarification to the other mendicants: the habit is old conditioning, not present ill will.
brahmin, ascetic, mendicant — the three titles the closing verse treats as equivalent, all earned by the same inner qualities — freedom from deceit, conceit, greed, and anger — rather than by birth.

The text

The discourse in full. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground. Now at that time Venerable Pilindavaccha addressed the mendicants as “lowlifes”. Then several mendicants went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him, “Sir, Venerable Pilindavaccha addresses the mendicants as ‘lowlifes’.”

§2–3So the Buddha addressed one of the monks, “Please, monk, in my name tell the mendicant Pilindavaccha that the Teacher summons him.” “Yes, sir,” that monk replied. He went to Pilindavaccha and said to him, “Reverend Pilindavaccha, the teacher summons you.” “Yes, reverend,” Pilindavaccha replied. He went to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him: “Is it really true, Vaccha, that you addressed the mendicants as ‘lowlifes’?” “Yes, sir,” he replied.

§4Then, having applied his mind to Pilindavaccha’s past lives, the Buddha said to the mendicants, “Mendicants, don’t complain about the mendicant Vaccha. He doesn’t address the mendicants as ‘lowlifes’ out of hate. For five hundred lives without interruption he was reborn in a brahmin family. For a long time, he has addressed people as ‘lowlife’. That’s why he addresses the mendicants as ‘lowlifes’.”

§5Then, understanding this matter, on that occasion the Buddha expressed this heartfelt sentiment:

§6“In whom dwells no deceit or conceit,
rid of greed, unselfish, with no need for hope,
with anger cast aside, quenched:
they are a brahmin, an ascetic, a mendicant.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: B. The Bamboo Grove near Rājagaha is the setting here, and also in Ud 3.7.
Question 2 of 10
What does Pilindavaccha call the other mendicants?
Correct: B. This contemptuous term (vasala) is what the other mendicants complain about.
Question 3 of 10
Why do mendicants complain to the Buddha?
Correct: B. They report exactly this habitual address.
Question 4 of 10
What does the Buddha do to investigate the matter?
Correct: B. This distinctive method is what produces the discourse’s explanation.
Question 5 of 10
What does the Buddha find as the source of Pilindavaccha’s speech habit?
Correct: B. The text states this span and cause explicitly.
Question 6 of 10
Does the Buddha say Pilindavaccha speaks this way out of hatred?
Correct: B. The Buddha directly clarifies this to the complaining mendicants.
Question 7 of 10
According to the closing verse, what marks a true “brahmin, ascetic, mendicant”?
Correct: B. The verse lists these inner qualities as what earns all three titles.
Question 8 of 10
According to the reading guide, what does the verse’s redefinition of “brahmin” suggest?
Correct: A. The reading guide draws this contrast between the story’s cause (birth-conditioned habit) and the verse’s standard (inner qualities).
Question 9 of 10
Who confirms to the Buddha that the accusation about Pilindavaccha is true?
Correct: A. Pilindavaccha admits it directly when asked.
Question 10 of 10
What does the Buddha instruct the other mendicants to do regarding Pilindavaccha?
Correct: B. “Mendicants, don’t complain about the mendicant Vaccha” is the Buddha’s direct instruction.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0