Reading guide
The teaching in one sentence
Mid-way through a Dhamma talk on extinguishment that he is already giving to an attentive assembly of mendicants, the Buddha pauses and speaks four sentences describing “that dimension” almost entirely through negation — no elements, no formless states, no worlds, no coming or going, not established, not proceeding, without support — concluding only that “this is the end of suffering.”
A talk already underway
It’s worth noticing the frame before the content. This is not the opening of a new discourse addressed to a fresh audience; it interrupts a talk already in progress. The mendicants are described as “paying attention, applying the mind, concentrating wholeheartedly, and actively listening” to an ongoing “Dhamma talk about extinguishment” when the Buddha, “understanding this matter,” breaks into the heartfelt exclamation that the whole Udāna collection is named for. The famous sentences that follow are not the entire teaching on nibbāna the mendicants received that day — only the one moment of it judged worth preserving verbatim.
What gets negated: the four elements
The negation opens with the four elements that, elsewhere in the Canon, are said to compose the entire physical world: “no earth, no water, no fire, no wind.” Whatever this dimension is, it does not consist of matter in any of the forms ordinarily used to describe matter.
What gets negated: the four formless attainments
The list continues directly into the four formless meditative attainments, named in their standard ascending order: “no dimension of infinite space, no dimension of infinite consciousness, no dimension of nothingness, no dimension of neither perception nor non-perception” — the four subtlest states reachable through concentration alone, in this tradition’s own meditative map. Setting these aside together with the four elements is a deliberate move: this dimension is not to be found by climbing one rung higher on the meditative ladder. It lies outside the ladder’s reach altogether, gross or subtle.
No world, no moon, no sun
The sentence then widens from psychological categories to cosmological ones: “no this world, no other world, no moon or sun.” This dimension is not located anywhere — not here, not in some further realm, not among the visible bodies that mark out sky and season. Whatever “dimension” (āyatana) means in this one sentence, it plainly does not mean a place in the ordinary sense of the word.
No coming, no going, no support
The second and third sentences deny every verb ordinarily used to describe something happening in time: “there is no coming or going or remaining or passing away or reappearing.” Then three further qualities, each a technical term for how an existing thing is normally grounded and sustained, are denied in turn: it “is not established, does not proceed, and has no support.” Arrival, departure, persistence, death, rebirth, foundation, continuation, dependence — the entire vocabulary available for describing something as existing in the ordinary way is set aside, one term after another.
“Just this is the end of suffering”
After roughly a dozen clauses of negation, the passage closes with its only positive statement, offered without elaboration: whatever has just been described — or rather, un-described — is the end of suffering. Not that it is blissful, or empty, or full, or existent, or non-existent. Simply that dukkha ends there, and the sentence stops.
A caution about what the text does not say
Faced with this much negation, it is tempting to fill the silence with a positive claim of one’s own — either that nibbāna must be some transcendent, eternal reality lying beyond the negated world, or that it must simply be nothingness, annihilation, the end of a process with nothing left over. Both readings go further than this passage actually goes. It never affirms an eternal self or substrate persisting beyond conditioned existence, which would be the classic eternalist move. But it equally never asserts that nothing whatsoever remains: it explicitly denies “passing away,” which is exactly the term that would apply if extinguishment meant ceasing to exist in the ordinary sense. What the passage offers is a sustained refusal to place this dimension inside any of the categories built for describing conditioned, located, temporal things — not a positive description dressed up as a negative one. Reading a resolution either way into it asks the text to assert something it deliberately withholds.
Key terms
The text
§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. Now at that time the Buddha was educating, encouraging, firing up, and inspiring the mendicants with a Dhamma talk about extinguishment. And those mendicants were paying attention, applying the mind, concentrating wholeheartedly, and actively listening.
§2Then, understanding this matter, on that occasion the Buddha expressed this heartfelt sentiment:
§3“There is, mendicants, that dimension where there is no earth, no water, no fire, no wind; no dimension of infinite space, no dimension of infinite consciousness, no dimension of nothingness, no dimension of neither perception nor non-perception; no this world, no other world, no moon or sun. There, mendicants, I say there is no coming or going or remaining or passing away or reappearing. It is not established, does not proceed, and has no support. Just this is the end of suffering.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.