Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 10.114

Bad Principles (2nd)

Dutiyaadhammasutta — Paccorohaṇivagga — the twelfth chapter of the Tens, the Chapter on the Ceremony of Descent

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
Ten parallel four-part formulas, one per factor
Length
~2 minutes to read
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — a clear, repetitive expansion of AN 10.113

Why this discourse

Where AN 10.113 stated its principle/result pairing only once, in the abstract, this discourse expands it into ten individual four-part formulas, specifying exactly what counts as a bad principle, a good principle, a bad result, and a good result for each of the ten factors in turn.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

For each of the ten factors from view to freedom, the wrong version is a bad principle and the right version a good principle, while the many bad qualities the wrong version produces are the bad result, and the many skillful qualities the right version fully develops are the good result.

Four questions, answered ten times over

The discourse opens by posing four explicit questions — what are bad principles, what are good principles, what are bad results, what are good results — then answers all four simultaneously for each of the ten factors, rather than treating the four questions as separate sections.

Principle and result kept genuinely distinct

The discourse's structure insists on a real distinction collapsed in looser speech: the principle itself (wrong view) is not identical to its result (the bad qualities it produces) — one is the cause named directly, the other its downstream consequence, each given its own clause in every one of the ten formulas.

The middle term in a three-discourse escalation

This discourse sits between AN 10.113's bare statement and AN 10.115's full narrative dramatization of the identical content — the same four-part formula given here in full will reappear, word for word, inside Ānanda's own explanation in the discourse that follows.

Key terms

pāpako dhammo — “a bad principle” — the term applied individually to each of the ten wrong factors in this discourse's expanded treatment.
kalyāṇo dhammo — “a good principle” — the mirrored term for each right factor.
micchādiṭṭhipaccayā aneke pāpakā akusalā dhammā sambhavanti — “the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong view” — the specific content of “bad result” for the first factor, view.
sammādiṭṭhipaccayā aneke kusalā dhammā bhāvanāpāripūriṁ gacchanti — “the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right view” — the mirrored “good result” for the same factor.
sammāvimutti — “right freedom” — the tenth and final factor, given the same fourfold treatment as all the others.

The text

The discourse in full: the four questions posed, then answered for all ten factors in turn. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Four questions

§1“Mendicants, you should know bad principles and good principles. And you should know bad results and good results. Knowing these things, your practice should follow the good principles with good results. So what are bad principles? What are good principles? What are bad results? And what are good results?

Ten factors, each given four answers

§2Wrong view is a bad principle. Right view is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong view are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right view are good results. Wrong purpose is a bad principle. Right purpose is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong purpose are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right purpose are good results. Wrong speech is a bad principle. Right speech is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong speech are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right speech are good results. Wrong action is a bad principle. Right action is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong action are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right action are good results. Wrong livelihood is a bad principle. Right livelihood is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong livelihood are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right livelihood are good results. Wrong effort is a bad principle. Right effort is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong effort are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right effort are good results. Wrong mindfulness is a bad principle. Right mindfulness is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong mindfulness are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right mindfulness are good results. Wrong immersion is a bad principle. Right immersion is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong immersion are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right immersion are good results. Wrong knowledge is a bad principle. Right knowledge is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong knowledge are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right knowledge are good results. Wrong freedom is a bad principle. Right freedom is a good principle. And the many bad, unskillful qualities produced by wrong freedom are bad results. And the many skillful qualities fully developed because of right freedom are good results.

Closing restatement

§3‘You should know bad principles and good principles. And you should know bad results and good results. Knowing these things, your practice should follow the good principles with good results.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What four questions does this discourse pose at its opening?
Correct: B. Four questions, then answered together for each of the ten factors.
Question 2 of 5
According to the guide, what distinction does this discourse insist on keeping clear?
Correct: B. A genuine cause/consequence distinction, not a loose conflation.
Question 3 of 5
How many times is the four-part formula applied in this discourse?
Correct: B. A full factor-by-factor expansion of AN 10.113's bare statement.
Question 4 of 5
According to the guide, what happens to this exact formula in AN 10.115?
Correct: B. The middle term in a three-discourse escalation toward full narrative dramatization.
Question 5 of 5
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: D. No location is given for this discourse.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0