Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 10.219

The Body Born of Deeds

Karajakāyasutta — Karajakāyavagga — the twenty-first chapter of the Tens, opening the Fifth Fifty

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha questioning the mendicants
Form
A declaration on kamma, then love, compassion, rejoicing, and equanimity offered as the way past deeds already done
Length
~2 minutes to read
Chapter's namesake
This discourse gives its own name to the entire chapter, Karajakāyavagga, the Chapter on the Body Born of Deeds
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — a pivotal, closely reasoned discourse

Why this discourse

Giving this entire chapter its name, this discourse asks a sharper question than any before it in this chapter's run: not simply that intentional deeds must be experienced, but whether the four immeasurable meditations — love, compassion, rejoicing, and equanimity — can change how old, already-done deeds actually play out.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A noble disciple who develops the heart's release through love (and compassion, rejoicing, and equanimity) understands that limited deeds no longer remain or persist in a mind grown limitless, so that past bad deeds done “with this deed-born body” are experienced here without following into the next life, leading to non-return.

Karajakāya, the term this chapter takes its own name from

Karajakāya, “the body born of deeds,” appears explicitly here for the first time in this chapter, naming the physical body itself as something produced by past kamma — the immeasurable meditations do not undo the deeds already committed with this body, but they change how, and how limitedly, their results are experienced.

Not erasing kamma, but outgrowing its limits

The discourse's own child-development thought experiment — a child who develops the heart's release by love from childhood on would do no bad deed, and doing no bad deed, experience no suffering — makes clear this is not a claim that meditation cancels or erases prior kamma; a mind grown limitless simply has no room left for limited deeds to remain in, so their effect cannot expand to fill an unlimited container.

A striking, gender-inclusive closing statement

“This heart's release by love should be developed by women or men, for neither women nor men take this body with them when they go” explicitly closes this chapter's own earlier run of gender-specific discourses (AN 10.213–215) with an emphatic claim that this particular practice belongs equally to everyone, since the body itself is left behind at death regardless of who inhabited it.

Key terms

karajakāya — “the body born of deeds” — this chapter's own namesake term, appearing explicitly here for the first time, naming the physical body as a product of past kamma.
cetovimutti mettā — “the heart's release by love” — the first of the four immeasurable meditations this discourse offers as a way of outgrowing, without erasing, prior deeds.
appamāṇaṁ cittaṁ bhāvitaṁ — “a mind that's limitless and well developed” — the discourse's own image for why limited past deeds no longer “remain or persist” once the mind itself has outgrown its own former limits.
na anāgataṁ samparāyaṁ anugacchati — “it will not follow me to my next life” — the discourse's own claim about deeds experienced fully in this life rather than carrying forward.
anāgāmitā — “non-return” — the third of the four stages of awakening, named here as this practice's own outcome for a mendicant who has not yet gone further.

The text

The discourse in full: the four immeasurable meditations offered as a way of outgrowing, without erasing, deeds already done. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Love, and the limitless mind

§1“Mendicants, I don’t say that intentional deeds that have been performed and accumulated are eliminated without being experienced. And that may be in this very life, or in the next life, or in some subsequent period. But in any case, there is no making an end of suffering without experiencing intentional deeds that have been performed and accumulated, I say. That noble disciple is rid of desire, rid of ill will, unconfused, aware, and mindful. They meditate spreading a heart full of love to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth. In the same way above, below, across, everywhere, all around, they spread a heart full of love to the whole world—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will. They understand: ‘Formerly my mind was limited and undeveloped. Now it’s limitless and well developed. Whatever limited deeds I’ve done don’t remain or persist there.’ What do you think, mendicants? Suppose a child had developed the heart’s release by love from their childhood on. Would they still do any bad deed?” “No, sir.” “Not doing any bad deed, would they still experience any suffering?” “No, sir. For if they don’t do any bad deed, from where would suffering afflict them?” “This heart’s release by love should be developed by women or men. For neither women nor men take this body with them when they go. The mind is what’s inside mortal beings. They understand: ‘Whatever bad deeds I have done in the past with this deed-born body I will experience here. It will not follow me to my next life.’ The heart’s release by love developed in this way leads to non-return for a wise mendicant here who has not penetrated to a higher freedom.

Equanimity, and the same teaching restated

§2They meditate spreading a heart full of compassion … They meditate spreading a heart full of rejoicing … They meditate spreading a heart full of equanimity to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth. In the same way above, below, across, everywhere, all around, they spread a heart full of equanimity to the whole world—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will. They understand: ‘Formerly my mind was limited and undeveloped. Now it’s limitless and well developed. Whatever limited deeds I’ve done don’t remain or persist there.’ What do you think, mendicants? Suppose a child had developed the heart’s release by equanimity from their childhood on. Would they still do any bad deed?” “No, sir.” “Not doing any bad deed, would they still experience any suffering?” “No, sir. For if they don’t do any bad deed, from where would suffering afflict them?” “This heart’s release by equanimity should be developed by women or men. For neither women nor men take this body with them when they go. The mind is what’s inside mortal beings. They understand: ‘Whatever bad deeds I have done in the past with this deed-born body I will experience here. It will not follow me to my next life.’ The heart’s release by equanimity developed in this way leads to non-return for a wise mendicant here who has not penetrated to a higher freedom.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What does this discourse offer as a way of relating to deeds already done?
Correct: B. This chapter's own namesake discourse, giving it the term karajakāya, the body born of deeds.
Question 2 of 6
According to the guide, what does the child-development thought experiment clarify?
Correct: B. A distinction between erasing kamma and outgrowing its limits.
Question 3 of 6
According to the guide, what does this discourse's closing statement about women and men accomplish?
Correct: B. Since the body itself is left behind at death regardless of who inhabited it.
Question 4 of 6
What outcome does this practice lead to, according to the discourse?
Correct: B. The third of the four stages of awakening.
Question 5 of 6
What does "karajakāya" mean, and what role does it play in this chapter, according to the guide?
Correct: B. This chapter's own namesake term, naming the physical body as a product of past kamma.
Question 6 of 6
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: D. No location is given for this discourse.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0