Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 10.7

Sāriputta

Sāriputtasutta — Anisaṁsavagga — the first chapter of the Tens

Setting
Sāvatthī, at the Dark Forest, recalled within the dialogue
Speakers
Venerable Ānanda questioning Venerable Sāriputta
Form
The identical question as AN 10.6, answered here through Sāriputta's own first-person recollection
Length
~2 minutes to read
A general formula, then a personal account
Where AN 10.6 answered with a general teaching, this discourse answers with Sāriputta's own specific, remembered experience
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — the same puzzle as AN 10.6, now grounded in a vivid personal account

Why this discourse

Ānanda puts the identical question to Sāriputta that he asked the Buddha at AN 10.6, and Sāriputta confirms it from his own experience at the Dark Forest: one perception arising as another ceased, ‘the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment,’ like a burning pile of twigs where one flame arises as another dies away.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Sāriputta confirms Ānanda's question from personal experience: at the Dark Forest, he gained a state of immersion perceiving none of the usual objects as themselves, while one perception arose as another ceased — ‘the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment.’

The same question, a personal rather than general answer

Ānanda repeats to Sāriputta, word for word, the same elaborate question already put to the Buddha at AN 10.6. But where the Buddha answered with a general teaching formula, Sāriputta answers by recounting a specific occasion in his own past: ‘this one time I was staying right here at Sāvatthī in the Dark Forest.’

A perception replacing a perception

Sāriputta's own account adds a detail AN 10.6 didn't supply: not simply the absence of ordinary perceptions, but one perception directly arising as another ceases — the repeated realization ‘the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment’ replacing whatever perception came before it.

A burning pile of twigs

The simile closing this discourse is vivid and precise: flames in a burning pile of twigs arise and cease in continuous succession, never all present at once yet the fire itself continuous — matching exactly how Sāriputta describes one perception replacing another without any gap in perceiving itself.

Key terms

tathārūpaṁ samādhiṁ — “a state of immersion like this” — the identical phrase Ānanda uses to put the same question to Sāriputta as he asked the Buddha at AN 10.6.
andhavanasmiṁ — “the Dark Forest” — the specific location near Sāvatthī where Sāriputta recalls attaining this state.
aññā saññā uppajjati, aññā saññā nirujjhati — “one perception arose... and another perception ceased” — Sāriputta's own precise description of what actually occurred, not simply an absence of perception.
bhavanirodho nibbānaṁ — “the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment” — the specific perception that repeatedly arose for Sāriputta at the Dark Forest.
dārukkhandhe... ekā acci uppajjati, ekā acci nirujjhati — “a burning pile of twigs. One flame would arise and another would cease” — the discourse's own closing simile, matching Sāriputta's account of continuous perception without ordinary perceptual objects.

The text

The discourse in full: the same question as AN 10.6, answered through Sāriputta's own personal recollection. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The same question, put to Sāriputta

§1Then Venerable Ānanda went up to Venerable Sāriputta, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to Sāriputta: “Could it be, reverend Sāriputta, that a mendicant might gain a state of immersion like this? They wouldn’t perceive earth in earth, water in water, fire in fire, or air in air. And they wouldn’t perceive the dimension of infinite space in the dimension of infinite space, the dimension of infinite consciousness in the dimension of infinite consciousness, the dimension of nothingness in the dimension of nothingness, or the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. And they wouldn’t perceive this world in this world, or the other world in the other world. And yet they would still perceive.” “It could be, Reverend Ānanda.”

A personal account, and a simile

§2“But how could this be?” “Reverend Ānanda, this one time I was staying right here at Sāvatthī in the Dark Forest. There I gained a state of immersion like this. I didn’t perceive earth in earth, water in water, fire in fire, or air in air. And I didn’t perceive the dimension of infinite space in the dimension of infinite space, the dimension of infinite consciousness in the dimension of infinite consciousness, the dimension of nothingness in the dimension of nothingness, or the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. And I didn’t perceive this world in this world, or the other world in the other world. And yet I still perceived.” “But at that time what did Reverend Sāriputta perceive?” “One perception arose in me and another perception ceased: ‘The cessation of continued existence is extinguishment. The cessation of continued existence is extinguishment.’ Suppose there was a burning pile of twigs. One flame would arise and another would cease. In the same way, one perception arose in me and another perception ceased: ‘The cessation of continued existence is extinguishment. The cessation of continued existence is extinguishment.’ At that time I perceived that the cessation of continued existence is extinguishment.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
How does Ānanda's question to Sāriputta compare to his question to the Buddha at AN 10.6?
Correct: B. The same elaborate question, put to a second teacher.
Question 2 of 6
How does Sāriputta's answer differ in kind from the Buddha's answer at AN 10.6?
Correct: B. A personal account grounding the same teaching in lived experience.
Question 3 of 6
Where does Sāriputta say he attained this state?
Correct: B. A specific, named location for a specific remembered occasion.
Question 4 of 6
What perception does Sāriputta say repeatedly arose for him?
Correct: B. One perception replacing another in continuous succession, not simple absence.
Question 5 of 6
What simile closes this discourse?
Correct: B. Continuous succession without any actual gap, matching Sāriputta's own description exactly.
Question 6 of 6
Who questions whom in this discourse?
Correct: B. The same questioner as AN 10.6, now addressing a different teacher.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0