Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 10.6

Immersion

Samādhisutta — Anisaṁsavagga — the first chapter of the Tens

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
Venerable Ānanda questioning the Buddha
Form
A precisely worded question, repeated verbatim in the answer, then a brief explanation
Length
~1 minute to read
A companion pair with AN 10.7
Ānanda asks the Buddha this question here, then asks Sāriputta the identical question next, receiving a very different kind of answer
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — a subtle and precisely worded meditative puzzle

Why this discourse

Ānanda asks whether a mendicant might gain a state of immersion where the four elements, the four formless dimensions, and even this world and the next are not perceived as themselves, and yet perception continues; the Buddha confirms this is possible through perceiving ‘this is peaceful, this is sublime’ — the stilling of all activities, extinguishment itself.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A mendicant can gain a state of immersion where none of the four elements, the four formless dimensions, or this world and the next are perceived as themselves, and yet perception continues, by perceiving that the stilling of all activities and the ending of craving is peaceful and sublime.

An unusually precise question

Ānanda's question is remarkable for its exhaustiveness: it names all four elements, all four formless dimensions, and both this world and another, denying that any of them are perceived as themselves — a near-total inventory of possible objects of perception, all set aside at once.

Perceiving something else entirely

The Buddha's answer doesn't describe an absence of perception but a redirection of it: what remains perceived, when none of the usual objects are perceived as themselves, is the peace and sublimity of extinguishment itself — the same ‘this is peaceful; this is sublime’ formula already met turning the mind toward the deathless at AN 9.36.

A companion question, a different kind of answer next

This discourse's exchange between Ānanda and the Buddha sets up AN 10.7 directly: there, Ānanda puts the identical question to Sāriputta, who answers not with a general formula but with his own specific, personally verified experience of exactly this state.

Key terms

tathārūpaṁ samādhiṁ — “a state of immersion like this” — Ānanda's own phrase, repeated verbatim in the Buddha's confirming reply.
na pathaviyaṁ pathavisaññī assa — “they wouldn't perceive earth in earth” — the first item in Ānanda's exhaustive inventory of set-aside perceptions.
tajjā saññā na assa — “and yet they would still perceive” — the discourse's own paradox, insisting perception itself continues despite none of its usual objects being perceived.
etaṁ santaṁ etaṁ paṇītaṁ — “this is peaceful; this is sublime” — the same formula already met at AN 9.36, here answering Ānanda's own precisely worded question.
sabbasaṅkhārasamatho... nibbānaṁ — “the stilling of all activities... extinguishment” — what is perceived in this state, closing the Buddha's answer.

The text

The discourse in full: Ānanda's precisely worded question, and the Buddha's confirming answer. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

A precisely worded question

§1Then Venerable Ānanda went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him: “Could it be, sir, that a mendicant might gain a state of immersion like this? They wouldn’t perceive earth in earth, water in water, fire in fire, or air in air. And they wouldn’t perceive the dimension of infinite space in the dimension of infinite space, the dimension of infinite consciousness in the dimension of infinite consciousness, the dimension of nothingness in the dimension of nothingness, or the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. And they wouldn’t perceive this world in this world, or the other world in the other world. And yet they would still perceive.” “It could be, Ānanda, that a mendicant might gain a state of immersion like this. They wouldn’t perceive earth in earth, water in water, fire in fire, or air in air. And they wouldn’t perceive the dimension of infinite space in the dimension of infinite space, the dimension of infinite consciousness in the dimension of infinite consciousness, the dimension of nothingness in the dimension of nothingness, or the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. And they wouldn’t perceive this world in this world, or the other world in the other world. And yet they would still perceive.” “But how could this be, sir?”

What remains, when nothing else is perceived

§2“Ānanda, it’s when a mendicant perceives: ‘This is peaceful; this is sublime—that is, the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment.’ That’s how a mendicant might gain a state of immersion like this. They wouldn’t perceive earth in earth, water in water, fire in fire, or air in air. And they wouldn’t perceive the dimension of infinite space in the dimension of infinite space, the dimension of infinite consciousness in the dimension of infinite consciousness, the dimension of nothingness in the dimension of nothingness, or the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. And they wouldn’t perceive this world in this world, or the other world in the other world. And yet they would still perceive.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What does Ānanda's question deny is perceived, in this state of immersion?
Correct: B. An unusually exhaustive question, covering nearly every category of possible perception.
Question 2 of 6
Despite denying all these objects, what does the discourse insist still continues?
Correct: B. A paradox the Buddha's answer resolves by naming what is perceived instead.
Question 3 of 6
What does the Buddha say is perceived in this state?
Correct: B. The same ‘peaceful, sublime’ formula already met turning the mind toward the deathless.
Question 4 of 6
What does this discourse set up for AN 10.7?
Correct: B. A companion pair — the same question, put to two different teachers.
Question 5 of 6
Where has this project already met the ‘peaceful, sublime’ formula?
Correct: B. The identical formula, reused here to answer Ānanda's precise question.
Question 6 of 6
Is a setting given for this discourse?
Correct: C. A bare dialogue, without an explicit narrative setting.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0