Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 11.3

Vital Conditions (1st)

Paṭhamaupanisāsutta — Nissayavagga — the first chapter of the Elevens

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
The same ten-link chain as vital conditions, each destroying or fulfilling the next, with a paired tree simile
Length
~2 minutes to read
A third framing
The same chain now cast causally: lacking one link destroys the vital condition for the next
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — the causal vocabulary (upanisā) is new to this chapter

Why this discourse

An unethical person destroys the vital condition for freedom from regret, and so on down the same ten-link chain to the knowledge and vision of freedom, exactly as a branchless tree cannot grow to fullness; an ethical person fulfills each vital condition in turn, exactly as a tree complete with branches and foliage grows to fullness.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Each link in the familiar ten-link chain is a ‘vital condition’ (upanisā) for the next: lacking ethics destroys the condition for freedom from regret, and so on up to the knowledge and vision of freedom, exactly as lacking branches and foliage prevents a tree's shoots and heartwood from growing to fullness.

A third framing of the same chain

This is the third discourse running to use this project's now-familiar ten-link chain: AN 11.1 questioned it, AN 11.2 called it natural, and this discourse recasts it as strict causal dependency, using the technical term upanisā — vital condition, proximate cause — that also names the Upanisā Sutta pattern met earlier in this project at AN 7.65.

The branchless tree

The simile is symmetrical and vivid: a tree lacking branches and foliage cannot grow its shoots, bark, softwood, or heartwood to fullness, just as an unethical person cannot fulfill any of the ten downstream conditions; a tree complete with branches and foliage grows fully, just as an ethical person fulfills every condition in turn.

Destruction and fulfillment as mirror structures

The discourse states the negative chain first in full (ten destroyed conditions), then abbreviates its own tree simile with an ellipsis before restating the positive chain in full and abbreviating the second tree simile the same way — a deliberately symmetrical construction that this chapter's next two discourses will repeat nearly verbatim, spoken by different speakers.

Key terms

upanisā — “vital condition”, proximate cause — the technical term giving this discourse its title, also met at AN 7.65's own Upanisā Sutta.
vihiṁsitāyaṁ hoti upanisā — “has destroyed a vital condition” — the refrain opening the negative chain, one link at a time.
paripūritāyaṁ hoti upanisā — “has fulfilled a vital condition” — the mirror refrain opening the positive chain.
sākhāpalāsa — “branches and foliage” — what the simile tree lacks or has, standing for ethics as the base condition for everything downstream.
pheggu sāra — “softwood, heartwood” — the tree's innermost growth, standing for the chain's furthest links, reachable only once the nearer conditions are met.

The text

The discourse in full: the ten-link chain as destroyed or fulfilled vital conditions, each paired with a tree simile. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Destroyed, like a branchless tree

§1“Mendicants, an unethical person, who lacks ethics, has destroyed a vital condition for having no regrets. When there are regrets, one who has regrets has destroyed a vital condition for joy. When there is no joy, one who lacks joy has destroyed a vital condition for rapture. When there is no rapture, one who lacks rapture has destroyed a vital condition for tranquility. When there is no tranquility, one who lacks tranquility has destroyed a vital condition for bliss. When there is no bliss, one who lacks bliss has destroyed a vital condition for right immersion. When there is no right immersion, one who lacks right immersion has destroyed a vital condition for true knowledge and vision. When there is no true knowledge and vision, one who lacks true knowledge and vision has destroyed a vital condition for disillusionment. When there is no disillusionment, one who lacks disillusionment has destroyed a vital condition for dispassion. When there is no dispassion, one who lacks dispassion has destroyed a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom. Suppose there was a tree that lacked branches and foliage. Its shoots, bark, softwood, and heartwood would not grow to fullness. In the same way, an unethical person, who lacks ethics, has destroyed a vital condition for having no regrets. When there are regrets, one who has regrets has destroyed a vital condition for joy. … When there is no dispassion, one who lacks dispassion has destroyed a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom.

Fulfilled, like a tree in full leaf

§2An ethical person, who has fulfilled ethics, has fulfilled a vital condition for not having regrets. When there are no regrets, one who has no regrets has fulfilled a vital condition for joy. When there is joy, one who has fulfilled joy has fulfilled a vital condition for rapture. When there is rapture, one who has fulfilled rapture has fulfilled a vital condition for tranquility. When there is tranquility, one who has fulfilled tranquility has fulfilled a vital condition for bliss. When there is bliss, one who has fulfilled bliss has fulfilled a vital condition for right immersion. When there is right immersion, one who has fulfilled right immersion has fulfilled a vital condition for true knowledge and vision. When there is true knowledge and vision, one who has fulfilled true knowledge and vision has fulfilled a vital condition for disillusionment. When there is disillusionment, one who has fulfilled disillusionment has fulfilled a vital condition for dispassion. When there is dispassion, one who has fulfilled dispassion has fulfilled a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom. Suppose there was a tree that was complete with branches and foliage. Its shoots, bark, softwood, and heartwood would grow to fullness. In the same way, an ethical person, who has fulfilled ethics, has fulfilled a vital condition for not having regrets. When there are no regrets, one who has no regrets has fulfilled a vital condition for joy. … When there is dispassion, one who has fulfilled dispassion has fulfilled a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What does the term "upanisā" mean in this discourse's title?
Correct: B. The same technical term met earlier at AN 7.65's Upanisā Sutta.
Question 2 of 6
What does the tree simile illustrate?
Correct: B. A symmetrical simile for destroyed or fulfilled conditions.
Question 3 of 6
According to the guide, this is which framing of the familiar ten-link chain?
Correct: B. Three consecutive discourses recast the same chain three different ways.
Question 4 of 6
How is the discourse's structure symmetrical, according to the guide?
Correct: B. A deliberately paired construction, repeated by the chapter's next two discourses.
Question 5 of 6
What does the guide say about this discourse's relation to the chapter's next two discourses?
Correct: B. AN 11.4 and AN 11.5 restate this content, spoken by Sāriputta and Ānanda respectively.
Question 6 of 6
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: B. No scene is set; the Buddha addresses the mendicants directly.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0