Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 11.4

Vital Conditions (2nd)

Dutiyaupanisāsutta — Nissayavagga — the first chapter of the Elevens

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
Venerable Sāriputta addressing the mendicants
Form
AN 11.3's identical vital-conditions chain and tree simile, now spoken by a disciple rather than the Buddha
Length
~2 minutes to read
Same content, different speaker
Word-for-word AN 11.3, reassigned to Sāriputta addressing the mendicants directly
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — identical content to AN 11.3, the interest is entirely in who now speaks it

Why this discourse

Venerable Sāriputta himself addresses the mendicants and restates AN 11.3's teaching word for word: an unethical person destroys the vital condition for freedom from regret, and so on down the same ten-link chain, exactly as a branchless tree cannot grow to fullness; an ethical person fulfills each condition in turn, exactly as a tree complete with branches and foliage grows to fullness.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Venerable Sāriputta restates AN 11.3's teaching to the mendicants directly, unchanged: each link in the ten-link chain is a vital condition for the next, destroyed by its absence or fulfilled by its presence, exactly as a tree lacking or having branches and foliage.

A disciple speaks the Buddha's own words

This discourse opens not with the Buddha addressing the mendicants but with Sāriputta himself calling out ‘Reverends, mendicants!’ and delivering the identical teaching just given at AN 11.3 — a familiar pattern in this project of a senior disciple restating the Buddha's own teaching under his own authority, without any framing narrative explaining why.

What changes, and what does not

Every substantive line of the vital-conditions chain and both tree similes matches AN 11.3 exactly; the only difference is the opening frame identifying Sāriputta as speaker and the mendicants, rather than an unnamed audience, as those addressed — content and authority are treated as fully separable here.

A pattern this project has met before

The move of reassigning an identical teaching to a named disciple, without further comment on why, echoes earlier instances across this project where the Buddha's own teaching is restated by Sāriputta, Ānanda, or Mahākaccāna — treated as carrying full authority simply because the content is identical, not because a narrative justifies the substitution.

Key terms

āvuso bhikkhave — “Reverends, mendicants!” — Sāriputta's own address to the assembly, distinct from the Buddha's usual ‘bhikkhave’ alone.
upanisā — “vital condition”, proximate cause — identical in meaning and use to AN 11.3's own key term.
vihiṁsitāyaṁ hoti upanisā — “has destroyed a vital condition” — the same refrain opening the negative chain, unchanged from AN 11.3.
paripūritāyaṁ hoti upanisā — “has fulfilled a vital condition” — the same mirror refrain opening the positive chain.
sākhāpalāsa — “branches and foliage” — the identical simile vocabulary carried over unchanged from AN 11.3.

The text

The discourse in full: Sāriputta's restatement of AN 11.3's vital-conditions chain and tree simile. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Sāriputta addresses the mendicants

§1There Venerable Sāriputta addressed the mendicants: “Reverends, mendicants!” “Reverend,” they replied. Sāriputta said this:

Destroyed, like a branchless tree

§2“An unethical person, who lacks ethics, has destroyed a vital condition for not having regrets. When there are regrets, one who has regrets has destroyed a vital condition for joy. When there is no joy, one who lacks joy has destroyed a vital condition for rapture. When there is no rapture, one who lacks rapture has destroyed a vital condition for tranquility. When there is no tranquility, one who lacks tranquility has destroyed a vital condition for bliss. When there is no bliss, one who lacks bliss has destroyed a vital condition for right immersion. When there is no right immersion, one who lacks right immersion has destroyed a vital condition for true knowledge and vision. When there is no true knowledge and vision, one who lacks true knowledge and vision has destroyed a vital condition for disillusionment. When there is no disillusionment, one who lacks disillusionment has destroyed a vital condition for dispassion. When there is no dispassion, one who lacks dispassion has destroyed a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom. Suppose there was a tree that lacked branches and foliage. Its shoots, bark, softwood, and heartwood would not grow to fullness. In the same way, an unethical person, who lacks ethics, has destroyed a vital condition for having no regrets. When there are regrets, one who has regrets has destroyed a vital condition for joy. … When there is dispassion, one who lacks dispassion has destroyed a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom.

Fulfilled, like a tree in full leaf

§3An ethical person, who has fulfilled ethics, has fulfilled a vital condition for not having regrets. When there are no regrets, one who has no regrets has fulfilled a vital condition for joy. When there is joy, one who has fulfilled joy has fulfilled a vital condition for rapture. When there is rapture, one who has fulfilled rapture has fulfilled a vital condition for tranquility. When there is tranquility, one who has fulfilled tranquility has fulfilled a vital condition for bliss. When there is bliss, one who has fulfilled bliss has fulfilled a vital condition for right immersion. When there is right immersion, one who has fulfilled right immersion has fulfilled a vital condition for true knowledge and vision. When there is true knowledge and vision, one who has fulfilled true knowledge and vision has fulfilled a vital condition for disillusionment. When there is disillusionment, one who has fulfilled disillusionment has fulfilled a vital condition for dispassion. When there is dispassion, one who has fulfilled dispassion has fulfilled a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom. Suppose there was a tree that was complete with branches and foliage. Its shoots, bark, softwood, and heartwood would grow to fullness. In the same way, an ethical person, who has fulfilled ethics, has fulfilled a vital condition for not having regrets. When there are no regrets, one who has no regrets has fulfilled a vital condition for joy. … When there is dispassion, one who has fulfilled dispassion has fulfilled a vital condition for knowledge and vision of freedom.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
Who speaks this discourse's teaching?
Correct: B. Sāriputta calls out to the assembly and delivers the teaching under his own authority.
Question 2 of 6
How does this discourse's content compare to AN 11.3's?
Correct: B. Every substantive line matches AN 11.3 exactly.
Question 3 of 6
According to the guide, what pattern does this discourse illustrate?
Correct: B. Content and authority are treated as separable, echoing earlier instances across this project.
Question 4 of 6
What is Sāriputta's own address to the assembly?
Correct: B. Distinct phrasing from the Buddha's own usual opening.
Question 5 of 6
What illustrates the destroyed or fulfilled vital conditions in this discourse?
Correct: B. The identical tree simile carried over unchanged from AN 11.3.
Question 6 of 6
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: B. No scene is set beyond Sāriputta addressing the mendicants.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0