Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.40

With Udāyī

Udāyīsutta — Cakkavagga — the fourth chapter of the Fours

Setting
None stated; Udāyī the brahmin comes to the Buddha, with the approach itself abbreviated in the Pāli
Speakers
The Buddha and Udāyī the brahmin
Form
AN 4.39 abbreviated, with a different and longer set of verses
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
As with AN 4.39; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — the prose is a repeat and the verses are where the new material is

Why this discourse

The same question, the same answer, a different brahmin — and a different set of verses. The prose is abbreviated almost to a stub, which is the compilers telling a reciter to supply AN 4.39 from memory. What is given in full is the verse section, and it moves the teaching from what to avoid to how to give: well-prepared, allowable, timely, and offered with a mind of letting go.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

The same distinction as AN 4.39, with the emphasis moved from the sacrifice that fails to the offering that succeeds.

A discourse that is mostly a pointer

The abbreviation here is heavier than anywhere else in the chapter. Even the approach is cut: Then Udāyī the brahmin went up to the Buddha, … and asked him. The greeting formula, the sitting to one side, the reasons for praising and criticizing — all elided.

This is how the collection stores a variant. The prose exists to establish that the teaching was also given to Udāyī; the reciter fills it in from the discourse before. What is written out in full is only what is new, which is the verses.

It is honest to say that this makes AN 4.40 a thin discourse on the page and a normal one in performance. A reader working through the Fours in order should read AN 4.39 and 4.40 as a single sitting, which is how they were meant to arrive.

Who Udāyī is

Simply Udāyī brāhmaṇo, a brahmin of that name, and nothing further is said about him. The name is common in the canon and attaches to several different figures, including monastics; there is no basis in this discourse for identifying him with any of them.

That is worth stating rather than guessing at. The discourse needs only that he is a brahmin asking the standard brahmin question, and it supplies nothing else.

Four qualities of a good sacrifice

The first verse names them: well-prepared and non-violent, a sacrifice that’s allowable and timely. Prepared, harmless, allowable (kappiya, permissible under the training), and timely.

Two of these are new relative to AN 4.39. Allowability introduces the question of whether what is offered may properly be received — a real concern in a tradition with detailed rules about what monastics may accept. Timeliness introduces the question of occasion.

Together they shift the analysis from the recipient to the gift. AN 4.39 asked who would attend; this asks what may properly be given, which is the donor’s side of the same transaction.

Well-gotten, well-offered, well-sacrificed

Suladdhaṁ suhutaṁ suyiṭṭhaṁ — three adverbs covering the whole life of the gift: how it was obtained, how it was presented, how it was given.

The first is the one usually left out of discussions of generosity and the one this collection returns to most. A gift made from what was wrongly acquired is not made good by the giving. The verse puts acquisition first in the sequence, before presentation and before the act itself.

‘To those worthy of a religious donation’ then supplies the recipient condition, and the field image from AN 4.34 returns: in the fertile field of spiritual practitioners. Source, manner, occasion, and recipient — the verse has assembled a complete account of what makes an offering work.

The mind of letting go

The last verse names the interior condition: when an intelligent, faithful person sacrifices like this, with a mind of letting go — muttacāga, with generosity released, an open hand.

That is the item none of the external conditions can supply, and putting it last is right. A gift can be well-gotten, allowable, timely, and correctly directed and still be given tightly. The verse asks for the hand to be actually open.

This closes the Cakkavagga, and it closes it on a lay note. The chapter opened with the four conditions for a prosperous life and ends with how to give away part of it. Between them it has held the lion’s roar, the four bests, two brahmin conversations, and the discourse on non-decline — a chapter with unusually wide range, and one that returns at the end to the audience it began with.

Key terms

kappiya — “allowable” — permissible under the training; whether what is offered may properly be received.
kālena — “timely” — the question of occasion, new here relative to AN 4.39.
suladdha suhuta suyiṭṭha — “well-gotten, well-offered, well-sacrificed” — three adverbs covering how a gift was obtained, presented, and given.
muttacāga — “with a mind of letting go” — generosity released, an open hand; the condition no external requirement can supply.
khetta — “field” — the fertile field of spiritual practitioners, the standing image for a recipient in whom a gift grows.

The text

The discourse in full: the abbreviated exchange and the five verses. The ellipses and gaps are the Pāli’s own abbreviation, which expects AN 4.39 to be supplied from memory. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The question, abbreviated

§1Then Udāyī the brahmin went up to the Buddha, … and asked him, “Does the worthy Gotama praise sacrifice?” “Brahmin, I don’t praise all sacrifices. Nor do I criticize all sacrifices. … Take the kind of sacrifice where cattle, goats and sheep, chickens and pigs, and various kinds of animals are slaughtered. I don’t praise that kind of violent sacrifice.

The non-violent sacrifice

§2But take the kind of sacrifice where cattle, goats and sheep, chickens and pigs, and various kinds of animals are not slaughtered. I do praise that kind of non-violent sacrifice; for example, a regular gift as an propitious sacrifice.

The verses

§3Well-prepared and non-violent, a sacrifice that’s allowable and timely, is attended by disciplined spiritual practitioners. The Buddhas—who have drawn back the veil from the world, passing beyond time and rebirth—praise this sacrifice, as they are expert in sacrifice.

§4When you’ve prepared a suitable offering, whether as sacrifice or for ancestors, sacrifice it with confident heart, in the fertile field of spiritual practitioners. When it’s well-gotten, well-offered, and well-sacrificed, to those worthy of a religious donation, a sacrifice is truly abundant, and even the deities are pleased.

§5When an intelligent, faithful person, sacrifices like this, with a mind of letting go, that astute one is reborn in a happy, pleasing world.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is the relationship between AN 4.40 and AN 4.39?
Correct: B. The prose exists to establish that the teaching was also given to Udāyī.
Question 2 of 10
How heavily is the prose abbreviated?
Correct: B. The reciter fills it in from the discourse before.
Question 3 of 10
What does the guide recommend for a reader working through the Fours?
Correct: B. A thin discourse on the page and a normal one in performance.
Question 4 of 10
What does the discourse tell us about Udāyī?
Correct: B. Worth stating rather than guessing at.
Question 5 of 10
What four qualities does the first verse give a good sacrifice?
Correct: B. Two of them are new relative to AN 4.39.
Question 6 of 10
What does kappiya introduce?
Correct: B. The donor’s side of the transaction.
Question 7 of 10
What do the three adverbs suladdha, suhuta, suyiṭṭha cover?
Correct: B. The whole life of the gift.
Question 8 of 10
Which of the three does the guide single out?
Correct: B. The verse puts acquisition first in the sequence.
Question 9 of 10
What is muttacāga?
Correct: B. A gift can meet every external condition and still be given tightly.
Question 10 of 10
How does the chapter close?
Correct: B. A chapter of unusually wide range, returning at the end to the audience it began with.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0