Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 5.166

Cessation

Nirodhasutta — Āghātavagga — the seventeenth chapter of the Fives

Setting
None stated; the discourse continues from AN 5.1, whose setting at Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove is understood to hold
Speakers
Sāriputta, Udāyī, Ānanda, Upavāṇa, and the Buddha
Form
extended narrative with dialogue, no five-item list
Length
~6 minutes to read
Northern parallel
not identified in this collection
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — long, doctrinally and dramatically dense

Why this discourse

One of this collection's most dramatic narratives: Sāriputta makes a doctrinal claim, is flatly rejected three times over by Venerable Udāyī — twice, in front of the whole assembly and then again in front of the Buddha — and falls silent, only for the Buddha to reveal that Udāyī never understood the term he was arguing about.

Reading guide

Sāriputta's claim, and Udāyī's threefold rejection

Sāriputta states: a mendicant accomplished in ethics, immersion, and wisdom might enter and emerge from the cessation of perception and feeling (saññāvedayitanirodha) — and if they don't reach full enlightenment in this life, they might be reborn among a certain host of mind-made gods (manomayakāya) and enter that same cessation there too. Udāyī rejects this outright, three times running, with no other mendicant speaking up to support Sāriputta.

Before the Buddha, rejected again

Getting no support, Sāriputta goes to the Buddha and restates his claim in front of him — and Udāyī rejects it a second set of three times, even there. Sāriputta, receiving no backing even in the Buddha's presence, falls silent rather than pressing the point further.

The Buddha corrects Udāyī, and rebukes Ānanda

The Buddha asks Udāyī directly what he even believes a ‘mind-made body’ is. Udāyī answers: the formless gods, made of perception — revealing he was arguing against a claim he'd fundamentally misunderstood, since the mind-made gods in question are not formless at all. The Buddha calls him ‘an incompetent fool’, then turns to Ānanda and rebukes him for silently watching a senior mendicant be harassed without showing any compassion for him.

Ānanda's own timidity, and Upavāṇa's answer

After the Buddha restates and confirms Sāriputta's original claim to the assembly and withdraws, Ānanda — visibly shaken by the Buddha's rebuke — goes to Venerable Upavāṇa and admits he now feels ‘overcome by timidity’ (sārajjaṁ okkantaṁ) himself, predicting correctly that the Buddha will raise the matter again that evening. When he does, he asks Upavāṇa what makes a senior mendicant dear and respected; Upavāṇa answers with five qualities (ethical conduct, deep learning, eloquent speech, easy mastery of the four absorptions, and the ending of defilements), which the Buddha affirms — adding that without these five, mere old age commands no real respect at all.

Udāyī, seen two ways

Cross-ref AN 5.159, where this same Udāyī is shown confidently and evidently capably teaching Dhamma to a large lay assembly at this very location. Here, just seven discourses later, he's shown confidently asserting something false three times over without grasping the term at stake — a pointed reminder that confident teaching and genuine understanding aren't always the same thing.

Ānanda's timidity, echoing AN 5.158

The exact phrase Ānanda uses for his own state — sārajjaṁ okkantaṁ, ‘overcome by timidity’ — is the identical term from AN 5.158's bare pentad on what overcomes a mendicant with timidity. Here that abstract term is dramatized directly: even Ānanda, the most learned of the Buddha's disciples, experiences it after witnessing a fellow senior mendicant harassed and being rebuked himself for his silence.

Key terms

saññāvedayitanirodha — “the cessation of perception and feeling” — the attainment at the center of this discourse's dispute.
manomayakāya — “mind-made body” — the kind of rebirth Sāriputta's claim depends on, and the term Udāyī fundamentally misunderstands.
bālassa abyattassa — “incompetent fool” — the Buddha's blunt rebuke of Udāyī.
sārajjaṁ okkantaṁ — “overcome by timidity” — Ānanda's own admitted state, the identical phrase used abstractly at AN 5.158.
piyo ca manāpo ca garu ca bhāvanīyo ca — “dear, beloved, respected, and admired” — the standing Upavāṇa is asked to define for a senior mendicant.

The text

The discourse in full: the dispute, the Buddha's correction, and Ānanda's confession. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Sāriputta's claim, and Udāyī's threefold rejection

§1There Venerable Sāriputta addressed the mendicants: “Reverends, take a mendicant who is accomplished in ethics, immersion, and wisdom. They might enter into and emerge from the cessation of perception and feeling. That is possible. If they don’t reach enlightenment in this very life, then, surpassing the company of gods that consume edible food, they’re reborn in a certain host of mind-made gods. There they might enter into and emerge from the cessation of perception and feeling. That is possible.” When he said this, Venerable Udāyī said to him, “This is not possible, Reverend Sāriputta, it cannot happen!” But for a second … and a third time Sāriputta repeated his statement. And for a third time, Udāyī said to him, “This is not possible, Reverend Sāriputta, it cannot happen!”

Before the Buddha, rejected again

§2Then Venerable Sāriputta thought, “Venerable Udāyī disagrees with me three times, and not one mendicant agrees with me. Why don’t I go to see the Buddha?” Then Sāriputta went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to the mendicants: “Reverends, take a mendicant who is accomplished in ethics, immersion, and wisdom. They might enter into and emerge from the cessation of perception and feeling. There is such a possibility. If they don’t reach enlightenment in this very life, they’re reborn in the company of a certain host of mind-made gods, who surpass the gods that consume edible food. There they might enter into and emerge from the cessation of perception and feeling. That is possible.” When he said this, Udāyī said to him, “This is not possible, Reverend Sāriputta, it cannot happen!” But for a second … and a third time Sāriputta repeated his statement. And for a third time, Udāyī said to him, “This is not possible, Reverend Sāriputta, it cannot happen!” Then Venerable Sāriputta thought, “Even in front of the Buddha Venerable Udāyī disagrees with me three times, and not one mendicant agrees with me. I’d better stay silent.” Then Sāriputta fell silent.

The Buddha corrects Udāyī, and rebukes Ānanda

§3Then the Buddha said to Venerable Udāyī, “But Udāyī, do you believe in a mind-made body?” “For those gods, sir, who are formless, made of perception.” “Udāyī, what has an incompetent fool like you got to say? How on earth could you imagine you’ve got something worth saying!” Then the Buddha said to Venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda! How can you just watch while a senior mendicant is being harassed? Don’t you have any compassion for a senior mendicant who is being harassed?” Then the Buddha addressed the mendicants: “Mendicants, take a mendicant who is accomplished in ethics, immersion, and wisdom. They might enter into and emerge from the cessation of perception and feeling. That is possible. If they don’t reach enlightenment in this very life, they’re reborn in the company of a certain host of mind-made gods, who surpass the gods that consume edible food. There they might enter into and emerge from the cessation of perception and feeling. That is possible.” That is what the Buddha said. When he had spoken, the Holy One got up from his seat and entered his dwelling.

Ānanda's own timidity, and Upavāṇa's answer

§4Then, not long after the Buddha had left, Venerable Ānanda went to Venerable Upavāṇa and said to him, “Reverend Upavāṇa, they’ve been harassing other senior mendicants, but I didn’t question them. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Buddha brings this up when he comes out of retreat later this afternoon. He might even call upon Venerable Upavāṇa himself. And right now I feel timid.” Then in the late afternoon, the Buddha came out of retreat and went to the assembly hall, where he sat on the seat spread out, and said to Upavāṇa, “Upavāṇa, how many qualities should a senior mendicant have to be dear and beloved to their spiritual companions, respected and admired?” “Sir, a senior mendicant with five qualities is dear and beloved to their spiritual companions, respected and admired. What five? It’s when a mendicant is ethical, restrained in the monastic code, conducting themselves well and resorting for alms in suitable places. Seeing danger in the slightest fault, they keep the rules they’ve undertaken. They’re very learned, remembering and keeping what they’ve learned. These teachings are good in the beginning, good in the middle, and good in the end, meaningful and well-phrased, describing a spiritual practice that’s totally full and pure. They are very learned in such teachings, remembering them, reciting them, mentally scrutinizing them, and penetrating them theoretically. They’re a good speaker who enunciates well, with a polished, clear, and articulate voice that expresses the meaning. They get the four absorptions—blissful meditations in this life that belong to the higher mind—when they want, without trouble or difficulty. They realize the undefiled freedom of heart and freedom by wisdom in this very life. And they live having realized it with their own insight due to the ending of defilements. A senior mendicant with these five qualities is dear and beloved to their spiritual companions, respected and admired.” “Good, good, Upavāṇa! A senior mendicant with these five qualities is dear and beloved to their spiritual companions, respected and admired. If these five qualities are not found in a senior mendicant, why would their spiritual companions honor, respect, revere, or venerate them? Because of their broken teeth, gray hair, and wrinkled skin? But since these five qualities are found in a senior mendicant, their spiritual companions honor, respect, revere, or venerate them.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does Sāriputta claim in this discourse?
Correct: A. The claim at the center of the discourse's dispute.
Question 2 of 10
How many times does Udāyī reject Sāriputta's claim in total, across both settings?
Correct: A. Three times, then again three times in front of the Buddha.
Question 3 of 10
What does the Buddha discover when he asks Udāyī what a 'mind-made body' means?
Correct: A. He was arguing against a claim he had misunderstood from the start.
Question 4 of 10
What does the Buddha call Udāyī after this exchange?
Correct: A. A blunt rebuke, following the exposed misunderstanding.
Question 5 of 10
What does the Buddha rebuke Ānanda for?
Correct: A. Ānanda's silence during Sāriputta's harassment.
Question 6 of 10
What does Ānanda admit to Venerable Upavāṇa afterward?
Correct: A. Sārajjaṁ okkantaṁ — the identical phrase from AN 5.158.
Question 7 of 10
Where else does the exact phrase 'sārajjaṁ okkantaṁ' appear in this nipāta?
Correct: A. Here dramatized directly in Ānanda's own admitted experience.
Question 8 of 10
What five qualities does Upavāṇa name as making a senior mendicant dear and respected?
Correct: A. The Buddha affirms this exact five-item answer.
Question 9 of 10
What does the Buddha add after affirming Upavāṇa's answer?
Correct: A. Broken teeth, gray hair, and wrinkled skin alone earn nothing.
Question 10 of 10
How does this discourse's portrayal of Udāyī contrast with AN 5.159's?
Correct: A. A pointed reminder that confident teaching and genuine understanding aren't always the same.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0