Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 5.167

Accusation

Codanāsutta — Āghātavagga — the seventeenth chapter of the Fives

Setting
None stated; the discourse continues from AN 5.1, whose setting at Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove is understood to hold
Speakers
Venerable Sāriputta; the Buddha responds at the close
Form
several paired five-item lists, plus a two-item grounding and closing dialogue
Length
~4 minutes to read
Northern parallel
not identified in this collection
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — long, but genuinely practical

Why this discourse

A detailed, genuinely useful teaching on the ethics of criticism within a community: what an accuser owes the person they're accusing, how both the properly and improperly accused should be met, and how the accused themselves should respond — grounded in nothing more than truth and an even temper.

Reading guide

Five things an accuser should establish

Before accusing anyone of anything, a mendicant should resolve: I will speak at the right time, not the wrong time; truthfully, not falsely; gently, not harshly; beneficially, not harmfully; and lovingly, not from secret hate — five conditions on the accuser's own conduct, established before a word is spoken.

Reassuring the improperly accused, chastening the improper accuser

When someone is accused at the wrong time, falsely, harshly, harmfully, or with secret hate, Sāriputta says they should be reassured they have no reason to feel remorse — while the one who made such an accusation should, by the same five criteria, be given reason to feel remorse instead.

Chastening the properly accused, reassuring the proper accuser

The mirror case: someone accused at the right time, truthfully, gently, beneficially, and lovingly should be given reason to feel remorse (since the accusation was accurate and fair), while whoever made that proper accusation should be reassured they did nothing wrong. The stated purpose is practical: so that no mendicant learns to think false accusations are acceptable, and so that mendicants keep making true ones.

Grounding yourself in truth and an even temper

Regardless of how one is accused — fairly or unfairly, gently or harshly — Sāriputta says the accused should ground themselves in just two things: truth and an unshakeable temper (sacca and akuppa). If the accusation is accurate, say so plainly; if it isn't, say that plainly too — neither defensive denial nor reflexive self-blame, just an accurate report.

Two kinds of mendicants, and the Buddha's exhortation

When the Buddha objects that some ‘futile people’ won't respectfully take even this good advice, Sāriputta distinguishes those ordained merely to earn a livelihood (who won't listen) from genuine gentlemen ordained out of faith (who will). The Buddha agrees, and tells Sāriputta to leave the first group be and focus his advising and instructing on the second — closing with the exhortation to draw spiritual companions away from false teachings and ground them in true ones.

A companion to AN 5.161's resentment techniques

Where AN 5.161–162 addressed resentment already arisen toward someone, this discourse addresses the moment of conflict itself — how to criticize well, and how to receive criticism well, before resentment has the chance to take root at all.

Key terms

codanā — “accusation” — this discourse's title concept, both giving and receiving it.
kālena, bhūtena, saṇhena, atthasaṁhitena, mettacitto — at the right time, truthfully, gently, beneficially, lovingly — the five conditions an accuser should meet.
avippaṭisāra / vippaṭisāra — the absence, or presence, of reason to feel remorse — the outcome depending on whether an accusation was proper or improper.
sacca, akuppa — truth and an even, unshakeable temper — the two things Sāriputta says the accused should ground themselves in, regardless of how they're accused.
kulaputta — “a gentleman” — here, one who went forth out of genuine faith, distinguished from those ordained merely to earn a livelihood.

The text

The discourse in full: how to accuse well, how to be accused well, and how to respond either way. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Five things an accuser should establish

§1There Sāriputta addressed the mendicants: “Reverends, a mendicant who wants to accuse another should first establish five things in themselves. What five? I will speak at the right time, not at the wrong time. I will speak truthfully, not falsely. I will speak gently, not harshly. I will speak beneficially, not harmfully. I will speak lovingly, not from secret hate. A mendicant who wants to accuse another should first establish these five things in themselves.

Reassuring the improperly accused, chastening the improper accuser

§2Take a case where I see a certain individual being accused at the wrong time, not being disturbed at the right time. They’re accused falsely, not disturbed truthfully. They’re accused harshly, not disturbed gently. They’re accused harmfully, not disturbed beneficially. They’re accused with secret hate, not disturbed lovingly. The mendicant who is accused improperly should be reassured in five ways. ‘Venerable, you were accused at the wrong time, not at the right time. There’s no need for you to feel remorse. You were accused falsely, not truthfully. … You were accused harshly, not gently. … You were accused harmfully, not beneficially. … You were accused with secret hate, not lovingly. There’s no need for you to feel remorse.’ A mendicant who is accused improperly should be reassured in these five ways. The mendicant who makes improper accusations should be chastened in five ways. ‘Reverend, you made an accusation at the wrong time, not at the right time. There’s a reason for you to feel remorse. You made an accusation falsely, not truthfully. … You made an accusation harshly, not gently. … You made an accusation harmfully, not beneficially. … You made an accusation with secret hate, not lovingly. There’s a reason for you to feel remorse.’ The mendicant who makes improper accusations should be chastened in these five ways. Why is that? So that another mendicant wouldn’t think to make a false accusation.

Chastening the properly accused, reassuring the proper accuser

§3Take a case where I see a certain individual being accused at the right time, not being disturbed at the wrong time. They’re accused truthfully, not disturbed falsely. They’re accused gently, not disturbed harshly. They’re accused beneficially, not disturbed harmfully. They’re accused lovingly, not disturbed with secret hate. The mendicant who is accused properly should be chastened in five ways. ‘Venerable, you were accused at the right time, not at the wrong time. There’s a reason for you to feel remorse. You were accused truthfully, not falsely. … You were accused gently, not harshly. … You were accused beneficially, not harmfully. … You were accused lovingly, not with secret hate. There’s a reason for you to feel remorse.’ The mendicant who is accused properly should be chastened in these five ways. The mendicant who makes proper accusations should be reassured in five ways. ‘Reverend, you made an accusation at the right time, not at the wrong time. There’s no need for you to feel remorse. You made an accusation truthfully, not falsely. … You made an accusation gently, not harshly. … You made an accusation beneficially, not harmfully. … You made an accusation lovingly, not with secret hate. There’s no need for you to feel remorse.’ The mendicant who makes proper accusations should be reassured in these five ways. Why is that? So that another mendicant would think to make a true accusation.

Grounding yourself in truth and an even temper

§4An individual who is accused should ground themselves in two things: truth and an even temper. Even if others accuse me—at the right time or the wrong time, truthfully or falsely, gently or harshly, beneficially or harmfully, lovingly or with secret hate—I will still ground myself in two things: truth and an even temper. If I know that that quality is found in me, I will tell them that it is. If I know that that quality is not found in me, I will tell them that it is not.”

Two kinds of mendicants

§5“Even when you speak like this, Sāriputta, there are still some futile people here who do not respectfully take it up.” “Sir, there are those faithless individuals who went forth from the lay life to homelessness not out of faith but to earn a livelihood. They’re devious, deceitful, and sneaky. They’re restless, insolent, fickle, scurrilous, and loose-tongued. They do not guard their sense doors or eat in moderation, and they are not dedicated to wakefulness. They don’t care about the ascetic life, and don’t keenly respect the training. They’re indulgent and slack, leaders in backsliding, neglecting seclusion, lazy, and lacking energy. They’re unmindful, lacking situational awareness and immersion, with straying minds, witless and idiotic. When I speak to them like this, they don’t respectfully take it up. Sir, there are those gentlemen who went forth from the lay life to homelessness out of faith. They’re not devious, deceitful, and sneaky. They’re not restless, insolent, fickle, scurrilous, and loose-tongued. They guard their sense doors and eat in moderation, and they are dedicated to wakefulness. They care about the ascetic life, and keenly respect the training. They’re not indulgent or slack, nor are they leaders in backsliding, neglecting seclusion. They’re energetic and determined. They’re mindful, with situational awareness, immersion, and unified minds; wise and clever. When I speak to them like this, they do respectfully take it up.” “Sāriputta, those faithless individuals who went forth from the lay life to homelessness not out of faith but to earn a livelihood … Leave them be. But those gentlemen who went forth from the lay life to homelessness out of faith … You should speak to them. Sāriputta, you should advise your spiritual companions! You should instruct your spiritual companions! Thinking: ‘I will draw my spiritual companions away from false teachings and ground them in true teachings.’ That’s how you should train.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What five things should an accuser establish before making an accusation?
Correct: A. Five conditions on the accuser's own conduct.
Question 2 of 10
How should someone accused improperly (at the wrong time, falsely, harshly) be treated?
Correct: A. The accusation's impropriety, not the accused's conduct, is at fault.
Question 3 of 10
What is the stated purpose of chastening someone who makes an improper accusation?
Correct: A. A community-preserving rationale, not mere punishment.
Question 4 of 10
What two things should the accused ground themselves in, regardless of how they're accused?
Correct: A. Sacca and akuppa — an accurate, unshaken response either way.
Question 5 of 10
What should the accused say if an accusation is accurate?
Correct: A. Neither defensive denial nor reflexive self-blame — an accurate report.
Question 6 of 10
When the Buddha objects that some people won't respectfully take this advice, how does Sāriputta respond?
Correct: A. Two very different kinds of mendicant, with very different receptiveness.
Question 7 of 10
What does the Buddha tell Sāriputta to do about the two groups?
Correct: A. A pragmatic allocation of teaching effort.
Question 8 of 10
What closing exhortation does the Buddha give Sāriputta?
Correct: A. This discourse's closing instruction to Sāriputta.
Question 9 of 10
How does this discourse relate to AN 5.161-162's techniques for resentment?
Correct: A. A companion concern: preventing resentment rather than dissolving it after the fact.
Question 10 of 10
What does 'kulaputta' mean in this discourse's context?
Correct: A. The receptive group Sāriputta is told to focus his advising on.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0