Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 5.206

Shackles

Vinibandhasutta — Kimilavagga — the twenty-first chapter of the Fives

Setting
None stated; the discourse continues from AN 5.1, whose setting at Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove is understood to hold
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
five parallel structures, each ending in the same diagnostic formula
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
not identified in this collection
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — escalates to a genuinely subtle final item

Why this discourse

A companion to AN 5.205's hard-heartedness, naming five shackles of attachment rather than doubt — and closing with its most subtle item: renunciation itself, undertaken not for liberation but in secret hope of a heavenly rebirth.

Reading guide

The same diagnostic formula, a different cause

As with AN 5.205, each shackle is shown to produce the identical result: a mind that doesn't incline toward keenness, commitment, persistence, and striving. Where hard-heartedness names doubt and resentment as the cause, this discourse names attachment.

Sensuality, the body, and form

Not being free of desire for sensual pleasures generally; not being free of desire specifically for one's own body; and not being free of desire for external form — three progressively more subtle objects of the same underlying attachment.

Indulgence in comfort

The fourth shackle names a specific, concrete behavior: eating until full, then indulging in the pleasures of sleeping, lying down, and drowsing — ordinary bodily comfort-seeking, named as a genuine obstacle to sustained practice.

The most subtle shackle: renunciation for the wrong reason

The fifth shackle is the most striking: leading the spiritual life while secretly hoping, through one's ethics or austerity or discipline, to be reborn as a god — renunciation itself, genuinely practiced in outward form, corrupted from within by a subtly self-interested motive.

A companion note on the fourth shackle's phrase

Cross-ref AN 5.192's brahmin typology, where devasama (equal to a god) names a genuinely praiseworthy path involving rebirth in a heavenly realm through disciplined household life. This discourse's fifth shackle names something related but distinct: wanting that outcome specifically, as the motive behind renunciation — the difference between a genuine outcome and a corrupting wish for it.

Key terms

cetasovinibandha — “shackle of the heart” — this discourse's title concept, five forms of attachment that prevent sustained effort.
kāmesu avītarāgo — “not free of desire for sensual pleasures” — the first, most general shackle.
seyyasukhaṁ passasukhaṁ middhasukhaṁ — “the pleasures of sleeping, lying down, and drowsing” — the specific comfort-seeking named in the fourth shackle.
aññataraṁ devanikāyaṁ paṇidhāya — “hoping to be reborn in one of the orders of gods” — the secret motive corrupting the fifth and most subtle shackle.
cittaṁ na namati ātappāya anuyogāya sātaccāya padhānāya — “the mind doesn't incline toward keenness, commitment, persistence, and striving” — the identical diagnostic formula shared with AN 5.205.

The text

The discourse in full: five shackles of the heart, from sensuality to a secret hope for heaven. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Five shackles of the heart

§1“Mendicants, there are these five shackles of the heart. What five? Firstly, a mendicant isn’t free of greed, desire, fondness, thirst, passion, and craving for sensual pleasures. This being so, their mind doesn’t incline toward keenness, commitment, persistence, and striving. This is the first shackle of the heart. Furthermore, a mendicant isn’t free of greed for the body … They’re not free of greed for form … They eat as much as they like until their belly is full, then indulge in the pleasures of sleeping, lying down, and drowsing … They lead the spiritual life hoping to be reborn in one of the orders of gods, thinking: ‘By this precept or observance or fervent austerity or spiritual practice, may I become one of the gods!’ This being so, their mind doesn’t incline toward keenness, commitment, persistence, and striving. This is the fifth shackle of the heart. These are the five shackles of the heart.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What five shackles of the heart does this discourse name?
Correct: A. Five forms of attachment, escalating in subtlety.
Question 2 of 10
How does this discourse relate to AN 5.205?
Correct: A. Both use the identical diagnostic formula for their conclusion.
Question 3 of 10
What does the fourth shackle describe?
Correct: A. Ordinary bodily comfort-seeking, named as a genuine obstacle.
Question 4 of 10
What makes the fifth shackle the most subtle of the five?
Correct: A. Renunciation practiced outwardly, undermined by an inward motive.
Question 5 of 10
How does this discourse's fifth shackle relate to AN 5.192's 'devasama' brahmin?
Correct: A. The difference between a genuine outcome and a corrupting wish for it.
Question 6 of 10
What does 'kāmesu avītarāgo' mean?
Correct: A. The first, most general shackle in this discourse's list.
Question 7 of 10
What three progressively subtle objects does this discourse name for the first three shackles?
Correct: A. Escalating subtlety within the same underlying attachment.
Question 8 of 10
What does 'aññataraṁ devanikāyaṁ paṇidhāya' mean?
Correct: A. The secret motive corrupting the fifth and most subtle shackle.
Question 9 of 10
What diagnostic formula does this discourse share with AN 5.205?
Correct: A. Identical wording, closing all five items in both discourses.
Question 10 of 10
What discourse follows, turning to an entirely practical, everyday concern?
Correct: A. Five benefits of rice porridge, a shift to mundane monastic life.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0