Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 5.214

Someone Who Talks a Lot

Bahubhāṇisutta — Akkosakavagga — the twenty-second chapter of the Fives

Setting
None stated; the discourse continues from AN 5.1, whose setting at Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove is understood to hold
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
two paired five-item lists, drawbacks then benefits
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
not identified in this collection
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — short, built on a classical foundation

Why this discourse

A concise discourse contrasting someone who simply talks a lot with someone who talks thoughtfully — built directly on the four classical wrong-speech precepts, with rebirth in hell or heaven as the fifth, cumulative consequence of each.

Reading guide

Volume, not content, as the real distinction

The discourse's title contrast is instructive: it isn't simply ‘bad speech versus good speech’, but ‘talking a lot’ (bahubhāṇi) versus ‘talking thoughtfully’ (mantabhāṇi) — framing the problem as much about excess and carelessness as about any specific content.

The four classical wrong-speech precepts

The actual content named for the person who talks a lot is the familiar fourfold formula: speech that's false, backbiting, harsh, and nonsensical (musāvāda, pisuṇavācā, pharusavācā, samphappalāpa) — the standard four kinds of wrong speech named throughout the early texts.

Five items from four wrongs plus one outcome

This discourse's ‘five drawbacks’ are really the four wrong-speech categories plus their shared karmic outcome, rebirth in hell — a slightly different construction from this chapter's other five-item lists, worth noticing rather than assuming it follows the same pattern automatically.

Thoughtful speech, by simple negation

The positive counterpart is the clean negation: not using any of the four wrong kinds of speech, leading instead to rebirth in heaven — manta (thoughtful, measured) speech defined here entirely by what it avoids.

A companion to this chapter's own speech-focused discourses

Cross-ref AN 5.211's abuse of spiritual companions and this chapter's broader concern with harmful speech — this discourse gives that concern its most classical, doctrinally familiar formulation.

Key terms

bahubhāṇi — “one who talks a lot” — this discourse's negative subject, framed by excess rather than only content.
mantabhāṇi — “one who talks thoughtfully” — the positive counterpart, measured and considered speech.
musā, pisuṇaṁ, pharusaṁ, samphappalāpaṁ — false, backbiting, harsh, and nonsensical speech — the four classical categories of wrong speech.
kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā — “when the body breaks up, after death” — the standard phrase introducing this discourse's rebirth outcome.
sugatiṁ saggaṁ lokaṁ — “a good place, a heavenly realm” — the positive rebirth outcome for one who speaks thoughtfully.

The text

The discourse in full: five drawbacks of talking a lot, and five benefits of talking thoughtfully. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Five drawbacks of talking a lot

§1“Mendicants, there are these five drawbacks for an individual who talks a lot. What five? They use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, and nonsensical. When their body breaks up, after death, they’re reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell. These are the five drawbacks for an individual who talks a lot.

Five benefits of talking thoughtfully

§2There are these five benefits for an individual who talks thoughtfully. What five? They don’t use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, and nonsensical. When their body breaks up, after death, they’re reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. These are the five benefits for an individual who talks thoughtfully.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What contrast does this discourse's title actually draw?
Correct: A. Bahubhāṇi versus mantabhāṇi.
Question 2 of 10
What four classical categories of wrong speech does this discourse name?
Correct: A. The standard fourfold wrong-speech formula from the early texts.
Question 3 of 10
How does this discourse's five-item structure differ from a strict five-item parallel list?
Correct: A. A slightly different construction worth noticing.
Question 4 of 10
How is thoughtful speech defined in the positive half of this discourse?
Correct: A. Manta speech defined entirely by what it avoids.
Question 5 of 10
What does 'mantabhāṇi' mean?
Correct: A. The positive counterpart to bahubhāṇi.
Question 6 of 10
What outcome does talking a lot lead to, according to this discourse?
Correct: A. The shared karmic outcome of the four wrong-speech categories.
Question 7 of 10
What does 'pisuṇaṁ' mean, as one of the four wrong-speech categories?
Correct: A. One of the four classical wrong-speech categories.
Question 8 of 10
What earlier discourse in this chapter connects to this one's concern with harmful speech?
Correct: A. This discourse gives that concern its most classical formulation.
Question 9 of 10
What does 'samphappalāpaṁ' mean?
Correct: A. The fourth of the four classical wrong-speech categories.
Question 10 of 10
What chapter does this discourse belong to?
Correct: A. 'Abuse', this session's twenty-second chapter.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0