Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.36

Roots of Dispute

Vivādamūlasutta — Devatāvagga — the fourth chapter of the Sixes

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
Six character traits named in turn, each followed by an identical closing instruction to give up or forestall it
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
The six roots of dispute recur closely in the Vinaya's own account of the Kosambī schism and across the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — direct and practical, naming interpersonal failings rather than abstract qualities

Why this discourse

Where much of this chapter has concerned individual practice — decline, recollection, perception — AN 6.36 turns to what actually fractures a community: six character traits, from irritability to rigid attachment to one's own views, each identified as a root from which disputes in the Saṅgha grow. Every one of the six carries the identical instruction attached: notice it in yourself or others, and work to give it up.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Six roots generate disputes in the Saṅgha: being irritable and acrimonious, offensive and contemptuous, jealous and stingy, devious and deceitful, having corrupt wishes and wrong view, and being attached to one's own views, holding them tight and refusing to let go.

Paired traits, not six isolated flaws

Each of the six items names not one quality but a pair: irritable and acrimonious, offensive and contemptuous, jealous and stingy, devious and deceitful, corrupt wishes and wrong view. The pairing suggests each root is a cluster — an inner disposition and its outward expression — rather than a single simple trait.

A shared consequence stated for each

Every one of the six items, not only the sixth, is followed by the identical diagnosis: such a mendicant “lacks respect and reverence for the Teacher, the teaching, and the Saṅgha, and doesn't fulfill the training,” and “creates a dispute in the Saṅgha, which is for the detriment and suffering of the people… for the harm, detriment, and suffering of gods and humans.” This is a serious claim: the discourse treats interpersonal friction not as a minor social problem but as harm extending to “gods and humans” broadly.

An identical instruction, repeated six times

Rather than varying its advice item by item, the discourse attaches the same instruction to every root: “if you see such a root of dispute in yourselves or others, you should try to give up this bad thing. If you don't see it, you should practice so that it doesn't come up in the future.” The instruction covers both correction and prevention, and applies equally whether the fault is found in oneself or observed in another.

The sixth root as a special case

The final root, attachment to one's own views — “holding them tight, and refusing to let go” — stands apart from the other five, which concern temperament and conduct. This one concerns intellectual rigidity specifically, and its presence at the list's end, closing five traits about how a person acts with one about how a person clings to what they believe, suggests dispute can be rooted as much in doctrine defended too fiercely as in bad behavior.

Key terms

vivādamūla — “root of dispute” — the discourse's own title, naming what each of the six character traits is said to generate.
kodhana upanāhī — “irritable and acrimonious” — the first root, pairing a hot temper with a tendency to hold grudges.
issukī maccharī — “jealous and stingy” — the third root, pairing resentment of others' good fortune with reluctance to share one's own.
sandiṭṭhiparāmāsī ādhānagāhī duppaṭinissaggī — “attached to their own views, holding them tight, and refusing to let go” — the sixth and final root, concerning intellectual rather than temperamental rigidity.
saṅghe vivādaṁ janeti — “creates a dispute in the Saṅgha” — the shared consequence attached to every one of the six roots.

The text

The discourse in full: the six roots of dispute, each with its shared consequence and instruction. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The first root: irritable and acrimonious

§1“Mendicants, there are these six roots of dispute. What six? Firstly, a mendicant is irritable and acrimonious. Such a mendicant lacks respect and reverence for the Teacher, the teaching, and the Saṅgha, and they don’t fulfill the training. They create a dispute in the Saṅgha, which is for the detriment and suffering of the people, against the people, for the harm, detriment, and suffering of gods and humans. If you see such a root of dispute in yourselves or others, you should try to give up this bad thing. If you don’t see it, you should practice so that it doesn’t come up in the future. That’s how to give up this bad root of dispute, so it doesn’t come up in the future.

Five further roots, and the conclusion

§2Furthermore, a mendicant is offensive and contemptuous … They’re jealous and stingy … devious and deceitful … with corrupt wishes and wrong view … They’re attached to their own views, holding them tight, and refusing to let go. Such a mendicant lacks respect and reverence for the Teacher, the teaching, and the Saṅgha, and they don’t fulfill the training. They create a dispute in the Saṅgha, which is for the detriment and unhappiness of the people, against the people, for the harm, detriment, and suffering of gods and humans. If you see such a root of dispute in yourselves or others, you should try to give up this bad thing. If you don’t see it, you should practice so that it doesn’t come up in the future. That’s how to give up this bad root of dispute, so it doesn’t come up in the future. These are the six roots of dispute.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What six roots of dispute does this discourse name?
Correct: A. Six paired character traits, each generating conflict within the Saṅgha.
Question 2 of 10
How is each of the six roots structured, according to the guide?
Correct: B. Irritable AND acrimonious, jealous AND stingy, and so on.
Question 3 of 10
What consequence is attached to every one of the six roots, not just the last?
Correct: B. A serious claim treating interpersonal friction as harm extending well beyond the immediate parties.
Question 4 of 10
What instruction is attached to each of the six roots?
Correct: B. Covering both correction and prevention, applied uniformly.
Question 5 of 10
How does the guide characterize the sixth root, compared to the other five?
Correct: B. Suggesting dispute can be rooted in doctrine defended too fiercely, not only bad behavior.
Question 6 of 10
What does vivādamūla mean?
Correct: B. The discourse's own title.
Question 7 of 10
Is a setting stated for AN 6.36?
Correct: B. A bare formula, though the theme closely echoes the Vinaya's Kosambī schism account.
Question 8 of 10
What does saṅghe vivādaṁ janeti mean?
Correct: B. The shared consequence attached to all six roots.
Question 9 of 10
What does issukī maccharī mean?
Correct: B. The third of the six roots.
Question 10 of 10
What broader context does the guide note for this discourse's theme?
Correct: B. A theme with real institutional weight elsewhere in the canon.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0