Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.37

A Gift With Six Factors

Chaḷaṅgadānasutta — Devatāvagga — the fourth chapter of the Sixes

Setting
Sāvatthī, in Jeta's Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika's monastery
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
A witnessed event, an analytical breakdown into six factors, an extended simile, and a closing verse
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
Analyses of what makes a gift maximally meritorious recur across the Chinese Āgamas and later Abhidharma literature; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★#9734;☆☆ — a clear analytical structure built around one memorable simile

Why this discourse

The Buddha, seeing with his clairvoyance a laywoman named Veḷukaṇṭakī preparing a donation for the Saṅgha, uses the occasion to analyze exactly what makes a gift maximally meritorious: three factors belonging to the donor's state of mind, and three to the recipients' state of purification. Six factors together, he says, produce merit as difficult to measure precisely as the water in the ocean — not immeasurable in the sense of infinite, but too vast to count exactly, reckoned only as “an incalculable, immeasurable, great mass.”

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A gift has six factors — three belonging to the donor (a good mood before giving, confidence while giving, feeling uplifted after giving) and three to the recipients (being free of greed, hate, and delusion, or practicing to be free of them) — and such a gift produces merit as difficult to measure precisely as the water in the ocean.

Three factors on each side of the exchange

The analysis divides evenly: the donor's three factors concern the psychological quality of the act of giving itself — mood before, confidence during, and feeling after — while the recipients' three factors concern their own spiritual state, independent of anything the donor does. Merit, on this analysis, is not produced by the donor alone or the recipient alone but by the conjunction of both sides being right.

An event the Buddha witnesses, not one he arranges

The occasion for this teaching is not a question asked or a problem raised but something the Buddha simply observes happening — a specific, named laywoman's preparation for a specific, named group of recipients, “the mendicant Saṅgha headed by Sāriputta and Moggallāna.” The analysis that follows is prompted by a real act already underway, not a hypothetical case.

The ocean simile, and what 'immeasurable' actually means

The extended simile — trying to state exactly how many gallons of water fill the ocean — is worth reading carefully for what it claims and doesn't. It does not claim the merit is literally infinite or beyond all limit; it claims only that, like the ocean's volume, a precise figure is impractical to state, so both are “simply reckoned as an incalculable, immeasurable, great mass.” The vastness is a statement about difficulty of measurement, not a metaphysical claim about infinity.

Closing verses naming a named practitioner's example

The closing verses restate the six factors in compressed form and end by describing an “intelligent, faithful person” who gives “with a mind of letting go” as reborn “in a happy, pleasing world” — drawing a direct line from the specific, witnessed act of generosity at the discourse's opening to a general statement about what such giving leads to.

Key terms

chaḷaṅgadāna — “gift with six factors” — the discourse's own title, naming the specific structure of an especially meritorious donation.
dakkhiṇā — “religious donation,” “offering” — the term for the gift being prepared and analyzed.
cāgasampahaṁsana — not a single compound in this translation but the sense captured by “feeling uplifted after giving” — the donor's third factor.
khīṇarāgā khīṇadosā khīṇamohā — “free of greed, hate, and delusion” — the recipients' state described in the first of their three factors, or else practicing toward it.
puññakkhandha — “mass of merit” — what the discourse says such a six-factored donation produces, reckoned incalculable like the ocean's volume.

The text

The discourse in full: the witnessed donation, the six factors analyzed, and the closing simile and verses. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

A witnessed donation

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. Now at that time Veḷukaṇṭakī, Nanda’s mother, was preparing a religious donation with six factors for the mendicant Saṅgha headed by Sāriputta and Moggallāna. The Buddha saw her doing this, with his clairvoyance that is purified and superhuman, and he addressed the mendicants: “This Veḷukaṇṭakī, Nanda’s mother, is preparing a religious donation with six factors for the mendicant Saṅgha headed by Sāriputta and Moggallāna.

The six factors, analyzed

§2And how does a religious donation have six factors? Three factors apply to the donor and three to the recipients. What three factors apply to the donor? It’s when a donor is in a good mood before giving, while giving they feel confident, and after giving they’re uplifted. These three factors apply to the donor. What three factors apply to the recipients? It’s when the recipients are free of greed, hate, and delusion, or practicing to be free of them. These three factors apply to the recipients. Thus three factors apply to the donor and three to the recipients. That’s how a religious donation has six factors.

The ocean simile

§3It’s not easy to grasp the merit of such a six-factored donation by saying that this is the extent of their overflowing merit, overflowing goodness that nurtures happiness and is conducive to heaven, ripening in happiness and leading to heaven. And it leads to what is likable, desirable, agreeable, to welfare and happiness. It’s simply reckoned as an incalculable, immeasurable, great mass of merit. It’s like trying to grasp how much water is in the ocean. It’s not easy to say how many gallons, how many hundreds, thousands, hundreds of thousands of gallons there are. It’s simply reckoned as an incalculable, immeasurable, great mass of water. In the same way, it’s not easy to grasp the merit of such a six-factored donation …

The closing verses

§4A good mood before giving, confidence while giving, feeling uplifted after giving: this is the perfect sacrifice. Free of greed, free of hate, free of delusion, undefiled; this is the field for the perfect sacrifice, the disciplined spiritual practitioners. After rinsing, you give with your own hands. This sacrifice is very fruitful for both yourself and others. When an intelligent, faithful person, sacrifices like this, with a mind of letting go, that astute one is reborn in a happy, pleasing world.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What prompts this discourse?
Correct: B. A real, witnessed event, not a hypothetical case.
Question 2 of 10
What are the donor's three factors?
Correct: B. The psychological quality of the act of giving itself.
Question 3 of 10
What are the recipients' three factors?
Correct: B. Independent of anything the donor does — the recipients' own spiritual state.
Question 4 of 10
What does the ocean simile actually claim, according to the guide?
Correct: B. 'Simply reckoned as an incalculable, immeasurable, great mass' — vastness, not literal infinity.
Question 5 of 10
Where is AN 6.37 set?
Correct: B. The setting most Aṅguttara discourses default to.
Question 6 of 10
Who are the specific recipients named in this donation?
Correct: B. A specific, named group, grounding the teaching in a concrete occasion.
Question 7 of 10
According to the discourse's analysis, is merit produced by the donor alone?
Correct: B. Three factors on each side, working together.
Question 8 of 10
What does puññakkhandha mean?
Correct: B. What the six-factored donation is said to produce, reckoned incalculable.
Question 9 of 10
What does the closing verse say about the 'intelligent, faithful person' who gives this way?
Correct: B. A direct line from the specific witnessed act to a general statement of consequence.
Question 10 of 10
How does the analysis divide the six factors?
Correct: B. An even split across both sides of the exchange.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0