Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.38

One’s Own Volition

Attakārīsutta — Devatāvagga — the fourth chapter of the Sixes

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
A brahmin, and the Buddha
Form
A stated doctrine, a sharp rejection, and a two-part argument from observable elements of effort
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
Refutations of fatalist and determinist doctrines recur across the Chinese Āgamas, often in debate with specific named opponents; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★#9734;☆☆ — a philosophical argument worth following step by step, not merely a list to memorize

Why this discourse

A brahmin states a doctrine to the Buddha directly: no one acts of their own volition, nor of another's. The Buddha's response is unusually blunt for this series — “may I never see or hear of anyone holding such a doctrine or view!” — and his refutation is not abstract but built from six named observable elements: initiative, persistence, exertion, strength, endurance, and energy. If these elements exist, and beings who exercise them are found, then volition is real.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Because there is an observable element of initiative, and beings who initiate activity are found, and because there is an observable element of energy, and beings who exert energy are found, sentient beings do act of their own volition or that of another — refuting the brahmin's doctrine that no one acts of their own or another's volition.

A doctrine of radical fatalism

The brahmin's position, stated in a single sentence, denies volition entirely: not “fate governs some things,” but that action itself, in either direction — self-caused or other-caused — does not occur. This is a stronger claim than ordinary determinism; it denies that the category of “acting” meaningfully applies to anyone at all.

An argument from observed capacity, not abstract logic

Rather than arguing philosophically about causation, the Buddha points to six specific, nameable capacities — ārambhadhātu, initiative; persistence; exertion; strength; endurance; vīriyadhātu, energy — and asks the brahmin directly whether each exists and whether beings who exercise each are found. The brahmin agrees to every step. The argument's force comes from getting the brahmin's own agreement to premises that, taken together, contradict his stated doctrine.

A pointed, almost sarcastic rebuttal

The Buddha's framing — “how on earth can someone who comes and goes on his own say that one does not act of one's own volition” — notes the performative contradiction directly: the brahmin walked to the Buddha under his own power to state a doctrine denying that anyone acts under their own power. The refutation is not only logical but points out the doctrine undermines the very situation of stating it.

A doctrinal debate ending in conversion

Unlike most of this chapter's discourses, this one ends with a specific outcome: the brahmin, persuaded, declares himself “a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.” The discourse is framed as successful persuasion, not merely a teaching stated and left to stand on its own.

Key terms

attakāra parakāra — “one's own volition, another's volition” — the two forms of agency the brahmin's doctrine denies and the Buddha's argument restores.
ārambhadhātu — “element of initiative” — the first of six observable elements the Buddha uses as evidence.
vīriyadhātu — “element of energy” — the sixth and final element named, closing the argument's second stage.
akiriyavāda — not directly named in this translation but the standard canonical term for the “doctrine of non-action” the brahmin appears to be stating.
saraṇaṁ gata — “gone for refuge” — the brahmin's closing declaration, converting the discourse's philosophical debate into a concrete outcome.

The text

The discourse in full: the brahmin's doctrine, the Buddha's refutation in two stages, and the brahmin's conversion. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

A brahmin states his doctrine

§1Then a certain brahmin went up to the Buddha, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to the Buddha: “Worthy Gotama, this is my doctrine and view: One does not act of one’s own volition, nor does one act of another’s volition.” “Brahmin, may I never see or hear of anyone holding such a doctrine or view! How on earth can someone who comes and goes on his own say that one does not act of one’s own volition, nor does one act of another’s volition?

The first argument: initiative

§2What do you think, brahmin, is there an element of initiative?” “Yes, sir.” “Since this is so, do we find sentient beings who initiate activity?” “Yes, sir.” “Since there is an element of initiative, and sentient beings who initiate activity are found, sentient beings act of their own volition or that of another.

The second argument: energy, and the brahmin's conversion

§3What do you think, brahmin, is there an element of persistence … exertion … strength … endurance … energy?” “Yes, sir.” “Since this is so, do we find sentient beings who have energy?” “Yes, sir.” “Since there is an element of energy, and sentient beings who have energy are found, sentient beings act of their own volition or that of another. Brahmin, may I never see or hear of anyone holding such a doctrine or view! How on earth can someone who comes and goes on his own say that one does not act of one’s own volition, nor does one act of another’s volition?” “Excellent, worthy Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may the worthy Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What doctrine does the brahmin state to the Buddha?
Correct: B. A radical denial that the category of 'acting' meaningfully applies to anyone.
Question 2 of 10
How does the Buddha's response to this doctrine compare in tone to most of this chapter's material?
Correct: B. A sharper rejection than most of this chapter's discourses.
Question 3 of 10
What six elements does the Buddha use as evidence against the brahmin's doctrine?
Correct: B. Observable capacities the brahmin agrees exist, contradicting his own stated doctrine.
Question 4 of 10
What method does the Buddha use to build his argument?
Correct: B. An argument built from the interlocutor's own admissions.
Question 5 of 10
What performative contradiction does the guide say the Buddha points out?
Correct: B. 'How on earth can someone who comes and goes on his own say that...'
Question 6 of 10
How does this discourse end?
Correct: B. A specific outcome of successful persuasion, unlike most discourses in this chapter.
Question 7 of 10
What does ārambhadhātu mean?
Correct: B. The first of the six elements named in the argument.
Question 8 of 10
Is a setting stated for AN 6.38?
Correct: B. A bare formula introducing the brahmin's approach.
Question 9 of 10
How strong a claim is the brahmin's doctrine, compared to ordinary determinism?
Correct: B. A radical denial of the category of acting altogether, not a claim about predetermined outcomes.
Question 10 of 10
What does vīriyadhātu mean?
Correct: B. The sixth and final element, closing the second stage of the argument.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0