Reading guide
The teaching in one sentence
Mendicants devoted to discernment of principles and mendicants devoted to absorption meditation should praise each other rather than show contempt or praise only their own kind, because genuine mastery of either path is rare and valuable in its own right.
Contempt in both directions, given equal weight
Mahācunda states first how discernment-practicing mendicants mock those who practice absorption — “why do they practice absorption meditation? In what way?” — and then, in exactly mirrored language, how absorption-practicing mendicants mock those who study doctrine as “restless, insolent, fickle… with straying minds.” The discourse refuses to favor either side's contempt as more justified than the other's.
A second failure: praising only one's own kind
Beyond outright contempt, Mahācunda names a subtler failure — discernment-practicing mendicants praising only others like themselves, and absorption-practicing mendicants doing the same. Both patterns, contempt and selective praise alike, are said to leave “the people” and “gods and humans” without benefit; the harm is described in exactly the same civic terms each time.
The prescribed remedy, and its stated reason
Mahācunda's instruction is not to abandon either practice or to declare one superior, but for each side to actively train in praising the other. The reason given for each direction is specific and not interchangeable: discernment-practitioners should praise absorption-practitioners because direct meditative experience of “the element free of death” is rare, and absorption-practitioners should praise discernment-practitioners because penetrating wisdom into a deep saying's meaning is rare — two distinct, non-competing kinds of rarity, not one path ranked above the other.
A named speaker rather than the Buddha, and why that may matter
This is one of several discourses in this chapter delivered by a senior disciple rather than the Buddha directly. Coming from Mahācunda, addressing an apparently real tension between two styles of practice within the monastic community, the teaching reads less like abstract doctrine and more like a senior figure directly managing a live source of friction among his peers.
Key terms
The text
Mutual contempt, in both directions
§1“Take a case where mendicants who practice discernment of principles rebuke mendicants who practice absorption: ‘They say, “We practice absorption meditation! We practice absorption meditation!” And they meditate and concentrate and contemplate and ruminate. Why do they practice absorption meditation? In what way do they practice absorption meditation? How do they practice absorption meditation?’ In this case the mendicants who practice discernment of principles are not inspired, and the mendicants who practice absorption are not inspired. And they’re not acting for the welfare and happiness of the people, for the people, for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of gods and humans. Now, take a case where mendicants who practice absorption meditation rebuke mendicants who practice discernment of principles: ‘They say, “We practice discernment of principles! We practice discernment of principles!” But they’re restless, insolent, fickle, scurrilous, loose-tongued, unmindful, lacking situational awareness and immersion, with straying minds and undisciplined faculties. Why do they practice discernment of principles? In what way do they practice discernment of principles? How do they practice discernment of principles?’ In this case the mendicants who practice absorption are not inspired, and the mendicants who practice discernment of principles are not inspired. And they’re not acting for the welfare and happiness of the people, for the people, for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of gods and humans.
Praising only one's own kind
§2Now, take a case where mendicants who practice discernment of principles praise only others like them, not mendicants who practice absorption. In this case the mendicants who practice discernment of principles are not inspired, and the mendicants who practice absorption are not inspired. And they’re not acting for the welfare and happiness of the people, for the people, for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of gods and humans. And take a case where mendicants who practice absorption praise only others like them, not mendicants who practice discernment of principles. In this case the mendicants who practice absorption are not inspired, and the mendicants who practice discernment of principles are not inspired. And they’re not acting for the welfare and happiness of the people, for the people, for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of gods and humans.
The remedy, and its stated reasons
§3So you should train like this: ‘As mendicants who practice discernment of principles, we will praise mendicants who practice absorption.’ That’s how you should train. Why is that? Because it’s rare to find such incredible individuals in the world who have direct meditative experience of the element free of death. So you should train like this: ‘As mendicants who practice absorption, we will praise mendicants who practice discernment of principles.’ That’s how you should train. Why is that? Because it’s incredibly rare to find individuals in the world who see the meaning of a deep saying with penetrating wisdom.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.