Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.47

Apparent in the Present Life (1st)

Paṭhamasandiṭṭhikasutta — Dhammikavagga — the fifth chapter of the Sixes

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The wanderer Moḷiyasīvaka, questioning the Buddha
Form
A question about a standing phrase, and a return-question building six confirmed cases of self-awareness
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
Verification of teaching through direct self-observation recurs as a theme across the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★#9734;☆☆ — a short dialogue with real philosophical weight about what verification actually means

Why this discourse

The phrase “apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection” recurs constantly through this series as part of the standard recollection-of-the-teaching formula, met most recently at AN 6.25 and 6.26 — but never before explained. Moḷiyasīvaka finally asks what it actually means, and the Buddha, rather than defining the phrase abstractly, answers with a question turned back on the wanderer's own immediate experience: do you know when there is greed in you, and when there is not?

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A teaching is “apparent in the present life” in the specific sense that one can know directly, right now, whether greed, hate, delusion, and their corresponding ideas are present or absent in oneself — verification requires no external authority, only attention to one's own mind.

A phrase this series has used but not defined until now

This exact phrase — sandiṭṭhiko dhammo, and the fuller formula around it — has appeared repeatedly as part of the recollection-of-the-teaching formula, most recently at AN 6.25 and 6.26, always as something to recollect rather than something explained. AN 6.47 is where a questioner finally asks what grounds the claim, and the answer turns out to be simpler and more immediate than a doctrinal definition.

Verification by return-question, not by argument

Rather than explaining the phrase in the abstract, the Buddha asks Sīvaka directly: “when there's greed in you, do you understand ‘I have greed in me’?” Sīvaka's own confirmed “yes, sir” becomes the proof: the very fact that he can answer the question demonstrates the teaching's verifiability, without the Buddha needing to argue for it separately.

Six confirmed cases, three pairs

The pattern repeats across three named states — greed, hate, delusion — and, separately, their corresponding “ideas” (thoughts colored by greed, hate, or delusion, distinct from the states themselves), each checked in both directions: presence known as presence, absence known as absence. Six confirmed cases in total, each independently verifiable by the person asked.

A wanderer's conversion, and what it signals

Sīvaka's closing declaration — “excellent, sir!” and going for refuge for life — is a real outcome, not a formality. Persuaded by nothing more than being shown that he already has direct access to verify a basic claim about his own mind, he converts on the strength of a method rather than a doctrine asserted to him from outside.

Key terms

sandiṭṭhiko dhammo — “a teaching apparent in the present life” — the phrase Sīvaka asks about, part of the standard recollection-of-the-teaching formula met earlier in this nipāta.
akāliko — “immediately effective,” not part of this discourse's own explanation but the next term in the same standing formula, verified by the same logic applied here.
rāgo, doso, moho — “greed, hate, delusion” — the three states checked first, each in both its presence and absence.
sarāgā dhammā, sadosā dhammā, samohā dhammā — “greedy ideas, hateful ideas, delusional ideas” — the second set of three checked, distinct from the bare states themselves.
paccattaṁ veditabbo viññūhi — not directly translated in this English rendering but the standard closing phrase of the recollection-of-the-teaching formula: “to be experienced by the wise for themselves.”

The text

The discourse in full: Moḷiyasīvaka's question, and the Buddha's six confirmed cases of self-knowledge. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Moḷiyasīvaka's question

§1And then the wanderer Moḷiyasīvaka went up to the Buddha, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to the Buddha: “Sir, they speak of ‘a teaching apparent in the present life’. In what way is the teaching apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves?”

Greed, and the pattern established

§2“Well then, Sīvaka, I’ll ask you about this in return, and you can answer as you like. What do you think, Sīvaka? When there’s greed in you, do you understand ‘I have greed in me’? And when there’s no greed in you, do you understand ‘I have no greed in me’?” “Yes, sir.” “Since you know this, this is how the teaching is apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves.

Hate, delusion, and their corresponding ideas

§3What do you think, Sīvaka? When there’s hate … delusion … greedy ideas … hateful ideas … When there are delusional ideas in you, do you understand ‘I have delusional ideas in me’? And when there are no delusional ideas in you, do you understand ‘I have no delusional ideas in me’?” “Yes, sir.” “Since you know this, this is how the teaching is apparent in the present life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that sensible people can know it for themselves.” “Excellent, sir! Excellent! From this day forth, may the Buddha remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What question does Moḷiyasīvaka ask the Buddha?
Correct: B. A phrase this series has used repeatedly without ever explaining what grounds the claim.
Question 2 of 10
How does the Buddha answer, rather than defining the phrase abstractly?
Correct: B. Sīvaka's own confirmed answer becomes the proof of the teaching's verifiability.
Question 3 of 10
What six cases does the Buddha's question ultimately check?
Correct: B. Three states plus their corresponding thought-patterns, verified in both directions.
Question 4 of 10
What does Sīvaka's confirmed 'yes, sir' demonstrate, according to the guide?
Correct: B. Verification by return-question rather than by doctrinal assertion.
Question 5 of 10
How does this discourse end?
Correct: B. A real conversion on the strength of a demonstrated method, not an asserted doctrine.
Question 6 of 10
Where has this exact phrase, 'apparent in the present life', appeared earlier in this nipāta?
Correct: B. Used repeatedly as something to recollect, never before explained until this discourse.
Question 7 of 10
Is a setting stated for AN 6.47?
Correct: B. A bare dialogue with no scene-setting clause.
Question 8 of 10
Who is Moḷiyasīvaka?
Correct: B. Distinguished from AN 6.48, the companion discourse's questioner, an unnamed brahmin.
Question 9 of 10
What are 'greedy ideas' (sarāgā dhammā), as distinct from greed itself?
Correct: B. The discourse checks six cases total: three states plus three corresponding 'ideas.'
Question 10 of 10
What philosophical point does this discourse make about verification, according to the guide?
Correct: B. The whole discourse's real philosophical weight.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0