Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.60

With Hatthisāriputta

Hatthisāriputtasutta — Mahāvagga — the sixth chapter of the Sixes, opening the Second Fifty

Setting
Varanasi, at Isipatana, in the deer park
Speakers
Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita, Venerable Citta Hatthisāriputta, and their companions; then the Buddha
Form
An interruption, a rebuke, a defense, a long chain of paired examples with matching similes, and a narrative confirmation
Length
~5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
Warnings that meditative attainment alone does not guarantee against relapse recur across the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★#9734;☆ — a long discourse whose argument depends on tracking seven parallel similes across escalating attainments

Why this discourse

When a junior mendicant interrupts senior mendicants discussing the teaching, and his companions defend him as too astute to be rebuked, Mahākoṭṭhita responds with an unusually long argument: seven similes, each showing that a temporary absence of a problem does not mean the problem cannot return, applied across an escalating series of attainments up to the fourth absorption and the signless immersion. The discourse's final section confirms the warning was accurate — and adds an outcome its own argument did not fully predict.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Even a mendicant who has attained deep meditative states, up to the signless immersion of the heart, can still resign the training and return to lay life if they grow overconfident and mix too closely with others, because none of these attainments, on their own, permanently guarantees against relapse.

Seven similes, one shared logical structure

An ox penned up can still break out and invade crops; dust settled by rain can still reappear once the ground dries; a pond's silt-free clarity after rain can return to murk; satisfaction after a good meal fades and appetite returns; a still lake can be stirred by a sudden storm; crickets silenced by an army's noise resume once the army departs. Each simile makes the identical point about a different kind of temporary absence, applied in turn to gentleness of temperament, then to each of the four absorptions, then to the signless immersion.

A defense that misses the actual point

Citta Hatthisāriputta's companions defend him as “astute… quite capable of talking about the teachings with the senior mendicants” — answering a claim about capability with evidence about intelligence. Mahākoṭṭhita's reply does not dispute Citta's intelligence at all; his point throughout is that intellectual capability and even genuine meditative attainment are simply not the same thing as being safe from relapse.

The warning confirmed, then complicated

Citta Hatthisāriputta does eventually resign the training, exactly as Mahākoṭṭhita's argument predicted. But the discourse does not end there: the Buddha's own response — “soon Citta will remember renunciation” — adds an outcome the seven similes, focused entirely on decline, had not themselves addressed. Citta does return, re-ordains, and reaches full awakening, an ending that complicates a straightforward reading of the warning as final or conclusive about his prospects.

Mahākoṭṭhita's own epistemic honesty

Asked afterward whether he knew this would happen through mind-reading or through a deity's report, Mahākoṭṭhita answers both are true — he does not claim a single, simpler source for his prediction, and the discourse does not resolve which knowledge was decisive. This detail keeps the discourse's authority grounded in specific, named claims rather than a vague appeal to general wisdom.

Key terms

na sukaraṁ etaṁ aññena aparassa cetasā ceto paricca jānituṁ — “it's not easy to know this for those who don't encompass another's mind” — Mahākoṭṭhita's opening qualification, framing his own knowledge as unusual rather than ordinarily available.
animittā cetovimutti — “the signless immersion of the heart” — the final and most advanced attainment named in the sequence of similes, already met at AN 6.13 as one of the six elements of escape.
sikkhaṁ paccakkhāya hīnāyāvattissati — “will resign the training and return to a lesser life” — the repeated outcome each simile in the sequence warns against.
cetopariyañāṇa — “knowledge encompassing another's mind” — one of the two sources Mahākoṭṭhita names for his prediction about Citta.
nekkhammaṁ anussarissati — “will remember renunciation” — the Buddha's own prediction, made immediately after Citta's departure, of his eventual return.

The text

The discourse in full: the interruption, Mahākoṭṭhita's seven similes, and Citta Hatthisāriputta's departure and return. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

An interruption, a rebuke, and a defense

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Varanasi, in the deer park at Isipatana. Now at that time several senior mendicants, after the meal, on their return from almsround, sat together in the pavilion talking about the teachings. Venerable Citta Hatthisāriputta interrupted them while they were talking. Then Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita said to Venerable Citta Hatthisāriputta, “Venerable, please don’t interrupt the senior mendicants while they’re talking about the teachings. Wait until the end of the discussion.” When he said this, Citta Hatthisāriputta’s companions said to Mahākoṭṭhita, “Venerable, please don’t rebuke Citta Hatthisāriputta. He is astute, and quite capable of talking about the teachings with the senior mendicants.” “It’s not easy to know this, reverends, for those who don’t encompass another’s mind. Take an individual who is the gentlest of the gentle, the most placid of the placid, the calmest of the calm, so long as they live relying on the Teacher or a spiritual companion in a teacher’s role. But when they’re separated from the Teacher or a spiritual companion in a teacher’s role, they mix closely with monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen; with rulers and their chief ministers, and with monastics of other religions and their disciples. As they mix closely, they become intimate and loose, spending time chatting, and so lust infects their mind. They resign the training and return to a lesser life.

The ox, the dust, and the pond: three similes

§2Suppose an ox fond of crops was tied up or shut in a pen. Would it be right to say that that ox will never again invade the crops?” “No it would not, reverend. For it’s quite possible that that ox will snap the ropes or break out of the pen, and then invade the crops.” “In the same way, take an individual who is the gentlest of the gentle … As they mix closely, they become intimate and loose, spending time chatting, and so lust infects their mind. They resign the training and return to a lesser life. And take an individual who, quite secluded from sensual pleasures … enters and remains in the first absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the first absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life. Suppose the heavens were raining heavily at the crossroads so that the dust vanished and mud appeared. Would it be right to say that now dust will never appear at this crossroad again?” “No it would not, reverend. For it is quite possible that people or cattle and so on will cross over the crossroad, or that the wind and sun will evaporate the moisture so that the dust appears again.” “In the same way, take an individual who, quite secluded from sensual pleasures … enters and remains in the first absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the first absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life. And take an individual who, as the placing of the mind and keeping it connected are stilled … enters and remains in the second absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the second absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life. Suppose there was a large pond not far from a town or village. After the heavens have rained heavily there, the clams and mussels, and pebbles and gravel would vanish. Would it be right to say that now the clams and mussels, and pebbles and gravel will never appear here again?” “No it would not, reverend. For it’s quite possible that people or cattle and so on will drink from the pond, or that the wind and sun will evaporate it so that the clams and mussels, and pebbles and gravel appear again.” “In the same way, take an individual who, as the placing of the mind and keeping it connected are stilled … enters and remains in the second absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the second absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life. And take an individual who, with the fading away of rapture … enters and remains in the third absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the third absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life. Suppose a person had finished a delicious meal. They’d have no appetite for leftovers. Would it be right to say that now food will never appeal to this person again?” “No it would not, reverend. For it’s quite possible that other food won’t appeal to that person as long as the nourishment is still present. But when the nourishment vanishes food will appeal again.” “In the same way, take an individual who, with the fading away of rapture … enters and remains in the third absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the third absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life.

The lake and the crickets: two more similes

§3And take an individual who, giving up pleasure and pain … enters and remains in the fourth absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the fourth absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life. Suppose that in a mountain glen there was a lake, placid and free of waves. Would it be right to say that now waves will never appear in this lake again?” “No it would not, reverend. For it is quite possible that a violent storm could blow up out of the east, west, north, or south, and stir up waves in that lake.” “In the same way, take an individual who, giving up pleasure and pain … enters and remains in the fourth absorption. Thinking, ‘I get the fourth absorption!’ they mix closely with monks … They resign the training and return to a lesser life. And take an individual who, not focusing on any signs, enters and remains in the signless immersion of the heart. Thinking, ‘I get the signless immersion of the heart!’ they mix closely with monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen; with rulers and their chief ministers, and with monastics of other religions and their disciples. As they mix closely, they become intimate and loose, spending time chatting, and so lust infects their mind. They resign the training and return to a lesser life. Suppose a ruler or their chief minister, while walking along the road with an army of four divisions, was to arrive at a forest grove where they set up camp for the night. There, because of the noise of the elephants, horses, chariots, soldiers, and the drums, kettledrums, horns, and cymbals, the chirping of crickets would vanish. Would it be right to say that now the chirping of crickets will never be heard in this woodland grove again?” “No it would not, reverend. For it is quite possible that the ruler or their chief minister will leave that woodland grove so that the chirping of crickets will be heard there again.” “In the same way, take an individual who, not focusing on any signs, enters and remains in the signless immersion of the heart … They resign the training and return to a lesser life.”

Citta's departure, and his return and awakening

§4Then after some time Venerable Citta Hatthisāriputta resigned the training and returned to a lesser life. Then the mendicants who were his companions went up to Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita and said, “Did Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita encompass Citta Hatthisāriputta’s mind and know that he had gained such and such meditative attainments, yet he would still resign the training and return to a lesser life? Or did deities tell you about it?” “Reverends, I encompassed his mind and knew this. And deities also told me.” Then the mendicants who were Citta Hatthisāriputta’s companions went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him, “Sir, Citta Hatthisāriputta, who had gained such and such meditative attainments, has still resigned the training and returned to a lesser life.” “Mendicants, soon Citta will remember renunciation.” And not long after Citta Hatthisāriputta shaved off his hair and beard, dressed in ocher robes, and went forth from the lay life to homelessness. Then Citta Hatthisāriputta, living alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute, soon realized the supreme culmination of the spiritual path in this very life. He lived having achieved with his own insight the goal for which gentlemen rightly go forth from the lay life to homelessness. He understood: “Rebirth is ended; the spiritual journey has been completed; what had to be done has been done; there is nothing further for this place.” And Venerable Citta Hatthisāriputta became one of the perfected.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What prompts Mahākoṭṭhita's rebuke of Citta Hatthisāriputta?
Correct: B. A breach of conversational conduct among senior mendicants.
Question 2 of 10
How do Citta's companions defend him?
Correct: B. A defense based on intelligence, which Mahākoṭṭhita's response reframes as beside the point.
Question 3 of 10
What shared logical structure do Mahākoṭṭhita's seven similes follow?
Correct: B. Applied to gentleness of temperament, then each of the four absorptions, then the signless immersion.
Question 4 of 10
What does Mahākoṭṭhita's argument actually dispute about Citta?
Correct: B. A distinction between capability/attainment and permanent safety from decline.
Question 5 of 10
What happens to Citta, confirming Mahākoṭṭhita's warning?
Correct: B. The narrative confirms the warning's accuracy.
Question 6 of 10
How does the discourse complicate a simple reading of the warning as final?
Correct: B. An ending that goes beyond what the decline-focused similes alone predicted.
Question 7 of 10
What two sources does Mahākoṭṭhita name for his knowledge of Citta's eventual fate?
Correct: B. He does not simplify his claim to a single source, keeping the discourse's authority specific rather than vague.
Question 8 of 10
Where is AN 6.60 set?
Correct: B. The location where the senior mendicants were gathered discussing the teachings.
Question 9 of 10
What does animittā cetovimutti mean, and where else has this series met it?
Correct: B. The most advanced attainment in this discourse's sequence, cross-referenced with an earlier discourse in this nipāta.
Question 10 of 10
What is the final attainment named before Citta's own resignation in the sequence of similes?
Correct: B. The escalating sequence culminates in the most advanced state named, immediately before the narrative confirms the warning.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0