Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.61

In the Middle

Majjhesutta — Mahāvagga — the sixth chapter of the Sixes, opening the Second Fifty

Setting
Varanasi, at Isipatana, in the deer park
Speakers
Several unnamed senior mendicants, in turn; then the Buddha
Form
A quoted verse, six independent interpretations offered in sequence, and the Buddha's own confirming and completing answer
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
Multiple valid readings of a single cryptic verse recur as a recognized interpretive pattern across Buddhist commentarial literature broadly, including in the Chinese tradition; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★#9734;☆ — abstract and interpretively demanding, rewarding careful attention to what each of the six readings actually substitutes

Why this discourse

Senior mendicants recall a terse verse from ‘The Way to the Far Shore,’ asking about a great man who has “known both ends” and is “not stuck in the middle,” escaping something called “the seamstress.” Six mendicants, one after another, propose six different readings of what the two ends and the middle actually refer to. Rather than picking a winner, the Buddha confirms that all six “spoken well in a way” — before revealing which reading he himself had originally intended.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A quoted verse about a great man who knows “both ends,” is not stuck in the “middle,” and escapes “the seamstress” (craving) admits at least six valid readings — contact, time, feeling, name-and-form, the sense fields, or substantial reality — each substituting different content into the verse's fixed structure while preserving craving as the constant “seamstress” weaving continued existence.

A fixed structure, six different fillings

Every one of the six proposed readings keeps the verse's underlying grammar identical: one end, a second end, a middle located between or arising from them, and craving as the seamstress weaving rebirth. What changes is only which specific triad of terms fills that structure — contact/origin of contact/cessation of contact; past/future/present; pleasant feeling/painful feeling/neutral feeling; name/form/consciousness; interior sense fields/exterior sense fields/consciousness; substantial reality/its origin/its cessation.

A verdict without a single winner

Asked directly “who has spoken well?” the Buddha's answer is not to rank the six proposals but to say “you've all spoken well in a way.” This is a genuinely unusual outcome for a doctrinal dispute in this collection — not a resolution that declares winners and losers, but a confirmation that several distinct readings can each be valid applications of one underlying principle.

The Buddha's own reading, given last

Having validated all six, the Buddha then states which reading he himself intended when composing the verse: contact as one end, the origin of contact as the second, and the cessation of contact as the middle. His own answer is not presented as overriding the other five, but as the specific case he “was referring to” — one true reading among several, rather than the sole true reading that makes the others simply wrong.

What 'the seamstress' names, across every reading

The one element every proposed reading keeps identical is craving (taṇhā) as “the seamstress,” explicitly explained as what “weaves one to being regenerated in one state of existence or another.” Whatever pair of ends and middle a reading proposes, the verse's actual claim about what needs to be escaped — craving itself — does not change.

Key terms

pārāyana — “The Way to the Far Shore” — the text this discourse's verse is quoted from, a well-known collection of verses elsewhere in the canon.
metteyyapañha — “The Questions of Metteyya” — the specific section within the Pārāyana this verse belongs to.
ubhante viditvā — “having known both ends” — the verse's central phrase, given at least six distinct valid readings across this discourse.
majjhe na līyati — “not stuck in the middle” — the second key phrase, likewise given multiple readings.
taṇhaṁ tantavāyaṁ — “craving, the seamstress” — the term held constant across every one of the six proposed interpretations.

The text

The discourse in full: the quoted verse, six independent readings, and the Buddha's confirmation and own reading. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The verse, recalled and questioned

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Varanasi, in the deer park at Isipatana. Now at that time, after the meal, on return from almsround, several senior mendicants sat together in the pavilion and this discussion came up among them, “Reverends, this was said by the Buddha in ‘The Way to the Far Shore’, in ‘The Questions of Metteyya’: ‘The thoughtful one who has known both ends, and is not stuck in the middle: he is a great man, I declare, he has escaped the seamstress here.’ But what is one end? What’s the second end? What’s the middle? And who is the seamstress?”

Six mendicants, six readings

§2When this was said, one of the mendicants said to the senior mendicants: “Contact, reverends, is one end. The origin of contact is the second end. The cessation of contact is the middle. And craving is the seamstress, for craving weaves one to being regenerated in one state of existence or another. That’s how a mendicant directly knows what should be directly known and completely understands what should be completely understood. Knowing and understanding thus they make an end of suffering in this very life.” When this was said, one of the mendicants said to the senior mendicants: “The past, reverends, is one end. The future is the second end. The present is the middle. And craving is the seamstress … That’s how a mendicant directly knows … an end of suffering in this very life.” When this was said, one of the mendicants said to the senior mendicants: “Pleasant feeling, reverends, is one end. Painful feeling is the second end. Neutral feeling is the middle. And craving is the seamstress … That’s how a mendicant directly knows … an end of suffering in this very life.” When this was said, one of the mendicants said to the senior mendicants: “Name, reverends, is one end. Form is the second end. Consciousness is the middle. And craving is the seamstress … That’s how a mendicant directly knows … an end of suffering in this very life.” When this was said, one of the mendicants said to the senior mendicants: “The six interior sense fields, reverends, are one end. The six exterior sense fields are the second end. Consciousness is the middle. And craving is the seamstress … That’s how a mendicant directly knows … an end of suffering in this very life.” When this was said, one of the mendicants said to the senior mendicants: “Substantial reality, reverends, is one end. The origin of substantial reality is the second end. The cessation of substantial reality is the middle. And craving is the seamstress, for craving weaves one to being regenerated in one state of existence or another. That’s how a mendicant directly knows what should be directly known and completely understands what should be completely understood. Knowing and understanding thus they make an end of suffering in this very life.”

The Buddha's confirmation, and his own reading

§3When this was said, one of the mendicants said to the senior mendicants: “Each of us has spoken from the heart. Come, reverends, let’s go to the Buddha, and inform him about this. As he answers, so we’ll remember it.” “Yes, reverend,” those senior mendicants replied. Then those senior mendicants went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and informed the Buddha of all they had discussed. They asked, “Sir, who has spoken well?” “Mendicants, you’ve all spoken well in a way. However, this is what I was referring to in ‘The Way to the Far Shore’, in ‘The Questions of Metteyya’ when I said: ‘The sage has known both ends, and is not stuck in the middle. He is a great man, I declare, he has escaped the seamstress here.’ Listen and apply your mind well, I will speak.” “Yes, sir,” they replied. The Buddha said this: “Contact, mendicants, is one end. The origin of contact is the second end. The cessation of contact is the middle. And craving is the seamstress, for craving weaves one to being regenerated in one state of existence or another. That’s how a mendicant directly knows what should be directly known and completely understands what should be completely understood. Knowing and understanding thus they make an end of suffering in this very life.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What verse do the senior mendicants recall and question?
Correct: B. A cryptic verse whose precise meaning is not immediately obvious.
Question 2 of 10
How many different readings do the mendicants propose?
Correct: B. Contact, time, feeling, name-and-form, the sense fields, and substantial reality.
Question 3 of 10
What stays constant across all six proposed readings?
Correct: B. A fixed grammar, filled with six different sets of terms.
Question 4 of 10
How does the Buddha respond when asked who spoke well?
Correct: B. A genuinely unusual outcome — validation of multiple readings rather than a single declared winner.
Question 5 of 10
What does the Buddha do after confirming all six readings?
Correct: B. Presented as one true reading among several, not the sole correct one.
Question 6 of 10
What does 'the seamstress' represent, across every proposed reading?
Correct: B. The one element every reading keeps identical, regardless of what fills the 'ends' and 'middle.'
Question 7 of 10
What text is this verse quoted from?
Correct: B. A well-known collection of verses referenced elsewhere in the canon.
Question 8 of 10
Where is AN 6.61 set?
Correct: B. The same location as AN 6.60, another discourse involving senior mendicants in discussion.
Question 9 of 10
What is one of the six proposed readings of 'one end' and 'the second end'?
Correct: B. One of six distinct triads proposed, each substituted into the same verse structure.
Question 10 of 10
How do the mendicants decide to resolve their disagreement?
Correct: B. A deliberate decision to seek the Buddha's own account rather than settle it among themselves.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0