Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 7.70

Honor

Sakkaccasutta — Mahāvagga — the seventh chapter of the Sevens

Setting
Opens in Sāriputta's private retreat, then moves to the Buddha in the late afternoon
Speakers
Venerable Sāriputta, reasoning first to himself, then presenting his conclusions to the Buddha
Form
Sāriputta's own solitary reasoning, a decision to seek confirmation, and then a three-part logical chain — impossibility without, impossibility while disrespecting, and possibility with respect — each stated once by Sāriputta and then confirmed by the Buddha
Length
~5 minutes to read
The same seven items as AN 7.59
Teacher, teaching, Saṅgha, training, immersion, diligence, and hospitality — identical to the list AN 7.59 gave earlier in this book, now worked out independently by Sāriputta rather than stated by the Buddha directly
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — the content is simple but the logical structure, repeated three ways, rewards careful tracking

Why this discourse

AN 7.70 has Sāriputta work out, entirely on his own during private retreat, that a mendicant should honor the same seven things AN 7.59 named — then, rather than trusting his own conclusion silently, bring it to the Buddha to be confirmed and made better known as purified, using the image of taking a gold ingot to a smith.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A mendicant should honor, respect, and rely on the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, diligence, and hospitality in order to give up the unskillful and develop the skillful — the same seven items AN 7.59 named, here reached independently by Sāriputta's own reflection.

A private conclusion, brought forward rather than kept

Sāriputta reaches his sevenfold conclusion alone in retreat, then reasons that even though these qualities are already pure and bright in him, telling the Buddha will not only keep them purified but make them better known as purified — comparing this to someone who takes an already-pure gold ingot to a smith anyway, simply so its purity becomes recognized rather than merely private.

A chain of dependency, stated three related ways

Once the Buddha confirms the seven items, Sāriputta unpacks their detailed meaning as a strict dependency chain: it is quite impossible to respect the teaching without respecting the Teacher first, impossible to respect the Saṅgha without respecting the Teacher and teaching first, and so on through all seven — then the same chain restated as what respecting an earlier item makes impossible to disrespect later, and again as what respecting each earlier item makes possible for the next.

The Buddha's confirmation, item for item

Rather than simply approving Sāriputta's answer as a whole, the Buddha explicitly restates the entire three-part chain himself, confirming Sāriputta's understanding is correct in every particular — a structure closely paralleling AN 7.65's own chain of destroyed and fulfilled conditions, though built from a different seven items.

Why bring a private insight forward at all

The discourse's frame — private reflection, a reasoned decision to seek confirmation, then that confirmation given in full — models something beyond the seven-item content itself: even a correct, independently reached insight gains something real from being tested against the Teacher rather than simply trusted and left unspoken.

Key terms

paṭisallāna — “private retreat” — the setting in which Sāriputta first works out this discourse's sevenfold conclusion on his own.
satthari, dhamme, saṅghe, sikkhāya, samādhismiṁ, appamāde, paṭisanthāre — “the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, diligence, hospitality” — the seven items, identical to AN 7.59's own list.
jātarūpaṁ suddhaṁ pariyodātaṁ — “a gold ingot, pure and bright” — the simile Sāriputta uses to explain why he brings an already-correct private insight to the Buddha for confirmation.
aṭṭhānametaṁ anavakāso — “it is quite impossible” — the recurring phrase opening each link of Sāriputta's dependency chain.
sādhu sādhu, Sāriputta — “good, good, Sāriputta!” — the Buddha's response both before and after Sāriputta's detailed exposition, confirming the conclusion at both ends of the discourse.

The text

The discourse in full: Sāriputta's private reflection, his decision to seek confirmation, the Buddha's initial approval, and Sāriputta's three-part dependency chain confirmed in detail. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Sāriputta's private reflection: seven things worth honoring

§1Then as Venerable Sāriputta was in private retreat this thought came to his mind, “What should a mendicant honor and respect and rely on, to give up the unskillful and develop the skillful?” Then he thought, “A mendicant should honor and respect and rely on the Teacher … the teaching … the Saṅgha … the training … immersion … diligence … A mendicant should honor and respect and rely on hospitality, to give up the unskillful and develop the skillful.”

Why he decides to tell the Buddha

§2Then he thought, “These qualities are pure and bright in me. Why don’t I go and tell them to the Buddha? Then these qualities will not only be purified in me, but will be better known as purified. Suppose a man were to acquire a gold ingot, pure and bright. They’d think, ‘My gold ingot is pure and bright. Why don’t I take it to show the smiths? Then it will not only be purified, but will be better known as purified.’ In the same way, these qualities are pure and bright in me. Why don’t I go and tell them to the Buddha? Then these qualities will not only be purified in me, but will be better known as purified.” Then in the late afternoon, Sāriputta came out of retreat and went to the Buddha. He bowed, sat down to one side, and told the Buddha of his thoughts while on retreat.

The Buddha confirms: the same seven things

§3“Good, good, Sāriputta! A mendicant should honor and respect and rely on the Teacher, to give up the unskillful and develop the skillful. A mendicant should honor and respect and rely on the teaching … the Saṅgha … the training … immersion … diligence … A mendicant should honor and respect and rely on hospitality, to give up the unskillful and develop the skillful.”

Sāriputta's exposition: a chain of dependent respect

§4When he said this, Venerable Sāriputta said to the Buddha: “Sir, this is how I understand the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who doesn’t respect the Teacher to respect the teaching. A mendicant who disrespects the Teacher disrespects the teaching. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who doesn’t respect the Teacher and the teaching to respect the Saṅgha. A mendicant who disrespects the Teacher and the teaching disrespects the Saṅgha. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who doesn’t respect the Teacher, the teaching, and the Saṅgha to respect the training. A mendicant who disrespects the Teacher, the teaching, and the Saṅgha disrespects the training. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who doesn’t respect the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, and the training to respect immersion. A mendicant who disrespects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, and the training disrespects immersion. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who doesn’t respect the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, and immersion to respect diligence. A mendicant who disrespects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, and immersion disrespects diligence. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who doesn’t respect the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, and diligence to respect hospitality. A mendicant who disrespects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, and diligence disrespects hospitality. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who does respect the Teacher to disrespect the teaching. … A mendicant who respects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, and diligence respects hospitality. It’s quite possible for a mendicant who respects the Teacher to respect the teaching. … A mendicant who respects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, and diligence respects hospitality. That’s how I understand the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement.”

The Buddha's confirmation, restated in full

§5“Good, good, Sāriputta! It’s good that you understand the detailed meaning of what I’ve said in brief like this. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who doesn’t respect the Teacher to respect the teaching. … A mendicant who disrespects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, and diligence disrespects hospitality. It is quite impossible for a mendicant who does respect the Teacher to disrespect the teaching. … A mendicant who respects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, and diligence respects hospitality. It’s quite possible for a mendicant who does respect the Teacher to respect the teaching. … A mendicant who respects the Teacher, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the training, immersion, and diligence respects hospitality. This is how to understand the detailed meaning of what I said in brief.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
Where does Sāriputta first reach his sevenfold conclusion in this discourse?
Correct: B. An independently reached insight, worked out in solitude.
Question 2 of 6
Why does Sāriputta decide to bring his already-correct conclusion to the Buddha rather than simply trusting it himself?
Correct: B. A reason about recognition and confirmation, not doubt about correctness.
Question 3 of 6
According to the guide, how does this discourse's seven-item list relate to AN 7.59's?
Correct: B. The same seven items, reached this time through Sāriputta's own independent reasoning.
Question 4 of 6
How many ways does Sāriputta restate the same dependency logic across the seven items?
Correct: B. The same underlying chain, stated from three related angles.
Question 5 of 6
How does the Buddha respond to Sāriputta's detailed exposition?
Correct: B. A full, detailed confirmation rather than a brief approval.
Question 6 of 6
According to the guide, what does this discourse's overall frame model, beyond its seven-item content?
Correct: B. A point about confirmation and shared verification, not just about the content itself.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0