Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 8.62

Good Enough

Alaṁsutta — Bhūmicālavagga — the seventh chapter of the Eights

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
Eight logical cases, each naming a different subset of six underlying qualities, cascading from six qualities down through two
Length
~3 minutes to read
Eight cases, not eight qualities
Unlike most of this book's eightfold lists, this discourse's underlying material is six qualities, not eight — the “eight” here counts logical cases built from different combinations of those six
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the most logically intricate discourse in this book so far, rewarding a careful case-by-case comparison

Why this discourse

AN 8.62 works through eight combinations of six underlying qualities — quick-wittedness, memory, comprehension of meaning, practicing accordingly, eloquent speech, and inspiring one's companions — showing which combinations make a mendicant good enough for their own benefit, for others' benefit, for both, or for neither.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Six underlying qualities combine in eight different ways across this discourse's cases, and which subset a mendicant has determines whether they are good enough for themselves alone, for others alone, or for both — with comprehension-and-practice serving one function and eloquence-and-inspiration serving the other.

Six qualities, not eight, underlying eight cases

The material this discourse works with is six qualities: quick-wittedness, ready memory, examining meaning, practicing in line with understanding, eloquent speech, and the ability to inspire companions. The “eight” in this chapter's theme counts the cases the discourse builds from different combinations of these six, not the qualities themselves.

A pattern emerges: comprehension for self, eloquence for others

Working through all eight cases reveals a consistent split: memory, examining meaning, and practicing accordingly serve one's own benefit, while eloquent speech and the ability to inspire serve others' benefit. Quick-wittedness turns out to be optional in every single case — its presence or absence never changes which verdict a case reaches.

Not every combination is possible

The discourse doesn't test all mathematically possible subsets of six qualities; it selects eight specific combinations that actually occur, revealing through their particular pairings (comprehension without eloquence; eloquence without comprehension; both; neither) that self-benefit and other-benefit are functionally independent outcomes, not two names for the same underlying accomplishment.

Key terms

alaṁ attano, alaṁ parassa — “good enough for themselves... good enough for others” — the discourse's own two independent verdicts, this discourse's own title term.
khippanisanti dhammesu — “quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings” — the one quality whose presence or absence never changes any case's verdict, appearing and disappearing without effect.
atthaṁ upaparikkhati — “examines the meaning of teachings they've memorized” — one of the qualities this discourse consistently ties to self-benefit rather than benefiting others.
sāvake ovadati anusāsati — “educates, encourages, fires up, and inspires their spiritual companions” — one of the qualities this discourse consistently ties to benefiting others.
cha dhammehi samannāgato, pañcahi dhammehi samannāgato — “with six qualities... with five qualities” — the discourse's own cascading count, descending from six qualities through five, four, three, and two across its eight cases.

The text

The discourse in full: eight cases built from six underlying qualities. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Six and five qualities: good enough for both

§1“Mendicants, a mendicant with six qualities is good enough for themselves and others. What six? A mendicant is quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker who enunciates well. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these six qualities is good enough for themselves and others. A mendicant with five qualities is good enough for themselves and others. What five? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these five qualities is good enough for themselves and others.

Four qualities, split two ways

§2A mendicant with four qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. What four? A mendicant is quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. But they’re not a good speaker and do not enunciate well. Their voice isn’t polished, clear, articulate, and doesn’t express the meaning. They don’t educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these four qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. A mendicant with four qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves. What four? A mendicant is quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. But they don’t examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Not understanding the meaning and the teaching, they don’t practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker who enunciates well. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these four qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves.

Three qualities, split two ways

§3A mendicant with three qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. What three? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. But they’re not a good speaker and do not enunciate well. Their voice isn’t polished, clear, articulate, and doesn’t express the meaning. They don’t educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these three qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. A mendicant with three qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves. What three? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. But they don’t examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Not understanding the meaning and the teaching, they don’t practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these three qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves.

Two qualities, split two ways

§4A mendicant with two qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. What two? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. And they don’t readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. But they examine the meaning of teachings they have memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re not a good speaker. Their voice isn’t polished, clear, articulate, and doesn’t express the meaning. They don’t educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these two qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. A mendicant with two qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves. What two? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. And they don’t readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. Nor do they examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Not understanding the meaning and the teaching, they don’t practice in line with the teaching. But they’re a good speaker who enunciates well. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these two qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
How many underlying qualities does this discourse's material actually consist of, despite its place in the Book of the Eights?
Correct: B. The 'eight' counts cases built from combinations of six underlying qualities, not the qualities themselves.
Question 2 of 6
According to the guide, what consistent pattern emerges across the eight cases?
Correct: B. A functional split between qualities serving different verdicts.
Question 3 of 6
What role does quick-wittedness play across all eight cases?
Correct: B. An optional quality whose presence turns out not to be load-bearing.
Question 4 of 6
What two independent verdicts does this discourse assess?
Correct: B. Two separate outcomes, not two names for the same accomplishment.
Question 5 of 6
How does this discourse select its eight cases?
Correct: B. A deliberately chosen set, not an exhaustive combinatorial listing.
Question 6 of 6
Is a setting given for this discourse?
Correct: C. A bare formula, matching AN 8.61's own lack of a stated setting.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0