Cariyapitaka · Story 31

Dark Light’s Conduct

Kaṇhadīpāyana Cariyā — The Chapter With Yudhañjaya · The Perfection of Truth (5th of 6)

Setting
No external narrative frame; the Buddha speaks in the first person about his past life as the seer Dark Light
Speaker
The Buddha, recounting his life as the seer, addressing the parents of a poisoned boy
Form
Thirteen verses of first-person narration, including a formal declaration of truth
Length
1–2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
This reading guide does not assert a specific matching text for this story in other Buddhist literatures.
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the collection's most conceptually unusual story, worth reading closely

Why this text

This story shares its basic device with Cp 29 and Cp 30 — a formal declaration of truth, producing a real effect — but breaks sharply with them in content. Where the quail and the fish king declared truths that reflected well on themselves, the seer Dark Light cures a poisoned boy by confessing something almost no one would willingly admit: that for fifty years, his own spiritual life has left him unsatisfied.

Reading guide

A private dissatisfaction, kept secret for decades

For more than fifty years the seer lived, in his own words, ‘dissatisfied’ — and told no one. The text is explicit that this was a private, ongoing state, not a passing mood: ‘it only went on in my mind.’

A crisis that has nothing to do with his own struggle

The emergency that draws out his confession is external: a boy, son of visiting friends, is bitten by a viper after touching it by accident, and collapses — the seer's own decades of quiet dissatisfaction have no obvious connection to this at all.

An unflattering truth, declared as the cure

Rather than declaring a truth about virtue or non-harm, as in Cp 29 and Cp 30, the seer declares the opposite kind of fact: ‘for just seven days with a mind of faith I led the spiritual life seeking merit. My life since then, for fifty years or more, I have lived unwillingly.’ This is a confession, not a claim to virtue.

The truth's power independent of what it reveals

The declaration works exactly as the other truth-acts in this chapter do — the boy recovers immediately. The story implies that the power of a saccakiriyā rests on the accuracy of what is declared, not on whether the content reflects well on the one declaring it.

Key terms

sacca — “truth” — the perfection this story illustrates, the fifth of six stories on this theme.
saccakiriyā — an “act of truth”, here declaring an unflattering private fact rather than a claim to virtue, unlike Cp 29's and Cp 30's examples.
Maṇḍabya — a fellow seer and spiritual companion of Dark Light's, whom he nurses back to health after Maṇḍabya is impaled on a stake, earlier in this story.
cariyā — “conduct” — this collection's title, and the word used for each of its thirty-five stories, this one its thirty-first.
Yaññadatta — the name given to the poisoned boy in the seer's own declaration of truth.

The text

The text in full: thirteen verses, including the seer's unusual declaration of truth. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Fifty years of private dissatisfaction

§1“Then again when I was the seer Dark Light, for more than fifty years I lived dissatisfied.

§2No-one knew of this dissatisfaction of mine, for I mentioned it to no-one, it only went on in my mind.

A friend nursed, then a crisis with strangers

§3Maṇḍabya, a spiritual companion and friend of mine was a great seer. Bound to a deed in a past life, he got impaled on a stake.

§4I nursed him and brought him back to health. Asking leave, I returned to my own hermitage.

§5A brahmin friend of mine, bringing wife and child, came to me, all three of them, as my guests.

§6As I exchanged greetings with them, seated in my own hermitage, the boy threw a ball and angered a viper.

§7Then the boy, looking which way the ball had gone, touched the viper’s head with his hand.

§8Angered at his touch, the snake, relying on its potent poison, completely enraged, bit the boy right away.

§9When bitten by the viper, the boy fainted on the ground. It made me distraught, the pain became as if mine.

A confession as the cure

§10Comforting the parents, in their suffering and sorrow, I made the first act, the original, supreme declaration of truth:

§11‘For just seven days with a mind of faith I led the spiritual life seeking merit. My life since then, for fifty years or more,

§12I have lived unwillingly. By this truth, may he be well! May the poison die! May Yaññadatta live!’

§13As I declared this truth, the boy trembling with poison, awoke and got up, the brahmin youth was well. There is no-one to equal my truthfulness: this is my perfection of truth.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does Dark Light keep secret for more than fifty years?
Correct: B. 'It only went on in my mind' — private, not a passing mood.
Question 2 of 10
What crisis prompts the seer's declaration of truth?
Correct: B. An emergency with no obvious connection to his own private struggle.
Question 3 of 10
How does this story's declaration of truth differ from Cp 29's and Cp 30's?
Correct: B. A sharp break in content while sharing the same underlying device.
Question 4 of 10
What exactly does the seer declare?
Correct: B. A confession, not a claim to virtue.
Question 5 of 10
What happens after the seer makes this declaration?
Correct: B. The same immediate effect as the other truth-acts in this chapter.
Question 6 of 10
What does this story suggest about the source of a truth-act's power?
Correct: B. An unflattering truth works exactly as well as a flattering one.
Question 7 of 10
Who is Maṇḍabya, and what happens to him earlier in this story?
Correct: B. An earlier episode of care, before the main crisis of the story.
Question 8 of 10
What name does the seer give the poisoned boy in his declaration?
Correct: B. Named directly: 'May the poison die! May Yaññadatta live!'
Question 9 of 10
What perfection does this story illustrate?
Correct: B. Continuing the sequence of six truth-stories in this chapter, its most unusual example.
Question 10 of 10
How is this story's difficulty rating best justified?
Correct: B. Worth reading closely for what it implies about truthfulness itself.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0