Reading guide
A claim about comprehending, not judging
The discourse’s framing is worth noticing carefully. It doesn’t say the Buddha condemns or punishes a person with a corrupted mind; it says that having comprehended such a mind, a specific understanding follows: “If this individual were to die right now, they would be placed in hell as if delivered there.” The claim is diagnostic, not moralizing — a description of where a particular mental state leads, stated as directly as the text can state it.
“As if delivered there”
This phrase carries real weight. It doesn’t describe rebirth in hell as a distant, uncertain possibility contingent on a future judgment; it describes something closer to an already-determined consequence, as automatic and immediate as being carried to a destination by someone else’s hand. The text asks its own question and answers it directly: “Why is that? Because their mind is corrupted.”
Mental state at the moment of death
The discourse’s closing prose line generalizes the point beyond this one hypothetical individual: “Corruption of mind is the reason why some sentient beings, when their body breaks up, after death, are reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell.” The specific timing matters here — the state of mind described is one held at the point of death, not necessarily a permanent trait, though the text doesn’t explore how such a state might arise or be reversed within this discourse itself.
The verse: three stanzas, one claim repeated
Unlike most of the discourses in this chapter, the verse here runs to three stanzas rather than one or two, and it takes its time. The first names the setting almost narratively — “the Buddha explained this matter in the mendicants’ presence” — before the second and third stanzas restate the prose’s claim nearly word for word: die now, be reborn in hell, “for their mind is corrupted,” “cast down as surely as if they’d been carried off and put there.” The repetition across three stanzas, rather than the usual one, gives this particular claim unusual emphasis within the chapter.
What answers it
This discourse’s natural counterpart, Iti 21 (“A Pure Mind”), lies just beyond the ten discourses gathered on this site and is built, structurally, by another set of hands entirely — but its existence is worth noting here. Just as Iti 18 and Iti 19 balanced schism against harmony, this discourse’s account of a corrupted mind leading to hell is answered, immediately next, by an account of a pure mind leading to heaven.
Key terms
The text
§1This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.
§2“Mendicants, when I’ve comprehended the mind of an individual whose mind is corrupted, I understand: ‘If this individual were to die right now, they would be placed in hell as if delivered there.’ Why is that? Because their mind is corrupted. Corruption of mind is the reason why some sentient beings, when their body breaks up, after death, are reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell.”
The Buddha spoke this matter. On this it is said:
§3–5“Knowing an individual’s
corrupted mind,
the Buddha explained this matter
in the mendicants’ presence.
If that individual
were to die at this time,
they’d be reborn in hell,
for their mind is corrupted.
That sort is cast down as surely
as if they’d been carried off and put there.
For corruption of mind is the reason
sentient beings go to a bad place.”
§6This too is a matter that was spoken by the Blessed One: that is what I heard.
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.