Itivuttaka · Discourse 21

A Pure Mind

Pasannacittasutta

Collection
Book of the Ones (Ekakanipāta), Chapter Three — Iti 21 of 27 in this book
Setting
No location or interlocutor is given — only the Itivuttaka’s stock opening and closing formula
Form
A single short paragraph of prose, then a three-quatrain verse restating exactly the same point
Length
< 1 minute to read
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — short and plainly stated

Why this discourse, twenty-first

Of all the things the Buddha might claim to know about another person, this discourse names one very specific thing: whether their mind, right now, happens to be clear and settled. Nothing else about the person is mentioned — not their conduct, their beliefs, or their history. Just this: purity of mind, examined directly, in this moment, is enough on its own to determine where a hypothetical death would lead.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

The Buddha describes reading the mind of some unnamed individual, finding it pure at that moment, and declaring that if death were to strike them right then, they would be reborn in heaven — not because of anything else about them, but purely because their mind, examined just then, was pure.

No story here, and that is worth saying plainly

Unlike many discourses in the four main nikāyas, this one gives no place, no audience beyond “mendicants,” and no occasion. It opens with the Itivuttaka’s standard framing — “This was said by the Buddha… that is what I heard” — and moves directly into the teaching itself. There is no brahmin visitor, no dispute to settle, no illness or death to respond to. This is typical of the collection as a whole: most of its 112 discourses are compact statements of a single point, not narrated encounters, and it is more honest to say so than to imagine a scene the text does not give.

A hypothetical death, examined directly

The claim itself is carefully hedged as a hypothetical: “if this individual were to die right now.” The Buddha is not describing someone who has actually died, nor predicting a specific person’s future. He is describing a capacity — the ability to directly perceive another person’s mental state (“having comprehended… with my mind their mind,” as the underlying Pali puts it) — and using that momentary reading to say what rebirth that state of mind would produce, were death to occur at that instant. The emphasis falls entirely on the present condition of the mind, not on any external circumstance of the person’s life.

“As if delivered there”

The verse adds one image the prose doesn’t use: being “raised up as surely as if they’d been carried and put there.” It is a passive, almost effortless picture — not a person striving upward through their own exertion at the last moment, but something more like being lifted and set down, because the condition making that placement fitting is already present. The verse does not introduce a new idea; it simply gives the prose statement a memorable image, which is exactly what verse does throughout this collection.

A pair, not a solitary claim

This discourse does not stand alone in its book. It sits immediately after Iti 20, “A Corrupted Mind” — and the titles alone suggest the relationship: where a corrupted mind is read and found to lead toward loss, a pure mind, read here, leads toward a good place. Read side by side, the two short discourses form a matched pair, each stating one half of the same underlying claim about how the state of mind, examined honestly, points toward its own consequence.

Key terms

pasannacitta — “a mind that is pure/clear”: the single condition this discourse names as decisive, and the word that gives the discourse its title.
ceto paricca pajānāmi — “having comprehended [their] mind with my mind, I understand”: the discourse’s way of describing direct perception of another person’s mental state, traditionally classed among the Buddha’s higher knowledges.
sugatiṃ saggaṃ lokaṃ — “a good place, a heavenly realm”: the named destination, stated as a direct consequence of the mind’s purity at the moment of death.
kāyassa bhedā paraṃ maraṇā — “when the body breaks up, after death”: a stock phrase used throughout the Itivuttaka and the wider canon to mark the moment rebirth is determined.
iti vuccati — “on this it is said”: the hinge phrase that, in almost every Itivuttaka discourse, turns from the prose statement to the verse restating it.

The text

The discourse in full: a single paragraph of prose and the three-quatrain verse that restates it. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1This was said by the Buddha, the Perfected One: that is what I heard.

§2“Mendicants, when I’ve comprehended the mind of an individual whose mind is pure, I understand: ‘If this individual were to die right now, they would be placed in heaven as if delivered there.’ Why is that? Because their mind is pure. Purity of mind is the reason why some sentient beings, when their body breaks up, after death, are reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.”

The Buddha spoke this matter. On this it is said:

§3“Knowing an individual’s
pure mind,
the Buddha explained this matter
in the mendicants’ presence.

§4If that individual
were to die at this time,
they’d be reborn in heaven,
for their mind is pure.

§5That sort is raised up as surely
as if they’d been carried and put there.
For purity of mind is the reason
sentient beings go to a good place.”

§6This too is a matter that was spoken by the Blessed One: that is what I heard.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does the Buddha say he has directly comprehended in this discourse?
Correct: C. “When I’ve comprehended the mind of an individual whose mind is pure…”
Question 2 of 10
What does the Buddha say would happen if that individual died right at that moment?
Correct: B. “They would be placed in heaven as if delivered there.”
Question 3 of 10
What reason does the Buddha give for this outcome?
Correct: D. “Why is that? Because their mind is pure.” The text names only this one factor.
Question 4 of 10
How does the discourse describe the destination itself?
Correct: A. “Reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.”
Question 5 of 10
What image does the verse add to describe how such a person arrives in a good place?
Correct: C. A passive, effortless image of being lifted and placed, matching the prose’s “as if delivered there.”
Question 6 of 10
What is honestly true about the setting of this discourse, according to the reading guide?
Correct: B. Like many Itivuttaka discourses, it offers no narrative frame — only the standard “this was said… that is what I heard” opening and closing.
Question 7 of 10
Where does this discourse sit in the Itivuttaka’s structure?
Correct: A. The Book of the Ones runs from Iti 1 to Iti 27; this is number 21, in its third chapter.
Question 8 of 10
Which discourse does the reading guide identify as this one’s closest counterpart?
Correct: D. Read together, a corrupted mind (Iti 20) and a pure mind (Iti 21) form a matched pair.
Question 9 of 10
Does the closing verse add any new content beyond the opening prose statement?
Correct: B. Prose statement, then “the Buddha spoke this matter, on this it is said,” then verse restating — the recurring form of nearly every discourse in this collection.
Question 10 of 10
What closing formula ends the discourse?
Correct: C. This exact closing line ends every discourse in the Itivuttaka, mirroring the opening formula.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0