Majjhima Nikāya · Discourse 40

The Shorter Discourse at Assapura

Cūḷa-Assapurasutta

Setting
Assapura, in the Aṅga country
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the monks
Form
Practical discourse on inner purification — the Buddha teaches that external marks do not make an ascetic; what matters is abandoning unwholesome inner qualities and pervading the world with loving-kindness, compassion, appreciative joy, and equanimity
Length
~12 minutes to read
Northern parallel
MĀ 183 (Madhyama-āgama 183)
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — direct and practical. The list of impurities to abandon is straightforward; the four brahmavihāras are presented with beautiful clarity. An excellent early reading.

Why this discourse, fortieth

MN 39 answered the question “What should an ascetic do?” with the full graduated training. MN 40 answers a deeper question: “What should an ascetic be?” The answer is not about technique but about character. A true ascetic is not someone who shaves their head and wears robes. A true ascetic is someone who has cleaned out the inner impurities — greed, hatred, anger, contempt, envy, deceit, wrong view — and replaced them with boundless goodwill toward all beings.

The discourse is structured as a simple movement: first, identify the impurities; then, abandon them; finally, develop the four brahmavihāras — loving-kindness, compassion, appreciative joy, and equanimity — pervading the entire world without limit. Where MN 39 culminates in the four jhānas and the three true knowledges, MN 40 culminates in the four boundless states. It is the “heart” path beside MN 39’s “wisdom” path — not opposed to it, but complementary.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Being an ascetic is not about external appearance but about abandoning inner impurities and pervading the world with loving-kindness, compassion, appreciative joy, and equanimity.

The structure of the discourse

SceneWhat happens
1. The challengePeople call you “ascetics.” You claim to be ascetics. You should train in the practices that make the claim true.
2. External marksThe Buddha lists external signs — shaved head, matted hair, rough robe, ashes on the body, sleeping on the ground, ritual bathing — and says that none of these make a person a true ascetic. The inner impurities may persist despite any amount of outward austerity.
3. The impuritiesThe Buddha lists specific inner impurities that a monk must recognize and abandon: covetousness and unrighteous greed, ill will and hatred, anger, hostility, contempt, domineering, envy, stinginess, deceit, fraud, evil desires, and wrong view. For each, the monk understands: “I have this impurity — it is an impure quality in an ascetic” — and abandons it.
4. The four brahmavihārasHaving abandoned the impurities, the monk pervades the world with loving-kindness (mettā), then compassion (karuṇā), then appreciative joy (muditā), then equanimity (upekkhā) — in all directions, boundless, without limit, free from hostility and ill will.
5. ConclusionA monk who has accomplished this is a true ascetic — one who has “bathed with the inner bathing.”

The impurities: a moral inventory

The list of impurities in MN 40 reads like a moral inventory. The Buddha does not ask the monk to suppress these qualities; he asks the monk to recognize them first: “I have covetousness and unrighteous greed — this is an impure quality in an ascetic.” Recognition is the first step. Only after honest acknowledgment can the monk make the effort to abandon them.

The list moves from the coarser to the subtler: from outright greed and hatred, through anger and resentment, to the more insidious qualities of contempt, domineering, envy, stinginess, deceit, fraud, evil desires, and wrong view. Wrong view comes last because it is the root: a person with wrong view will generate all the other impurities, while right view naturally leads to their abandonment.

The four brahmavihāras

The discourse’s climax is the development of the four brahmavihāras — the “divine abidings” or “boundless states.” These are not sentiments but trained mental states, cultivated through formal practice:

  • Loving-kindness (mettā) — the wish for all beings to be happy. Pervaded in all directions, without limit, without exclusion.
  • Compassion (karuṇā) — the wish for all beings to be free from suffering. Not pity but an active response to the pain of others.
  • Appreciative joy (muditā) — joy in the success, happiness, and good fortune of others. The antidote to envy.
  • Equanimity (upekkhā) — a balanced, impartial awareness that embraces all beings without preference. Not indifference but a steady, wise composure.

The formula is the same for each: the monk pervades “one direction, then the second, the third, the fourth, above, below, all around, everywhere — the whole world with a mind full of [loving-kindness / compassion / appreciative joy / equanimity], abundant, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without ill will.” The language insists on boundlessness: no being is excluded.

MN 39 and MN 40: two paths to the same place

MN 39 (the Greater Discourse at Assapura) gives the full graduated training: moral restraint, sense restraint, the jhānas, and the three true knowledges. It is the “wisdom path” — detailed, technical, culminating in direct insight.

MN 40 (the Shorter Discourse at Assapura) gives a different angle: abandon the inner impurities and develop the boundless states. It is the “heart path” — focused on ethical purification and universal goodwill. The two discourses are not in tension; they are complementary. A complete practitioner walks both paths. MN 40 reminds us that the point of all the technical training in MN 39 is not technique for its own sake but the transformation of character.

Three questions Western students often ask

“If robes and shaving don’t make an ascetic, why do monks still do it?” The Buddha does not say external practices are useless — he says they are insufficient. Shaving the head and wearing robes serve as reminders of renunciation, as aids to simplicity, and as a social signal that invites accountability. But they are the container, not the content. A shaved head without inner purification is an empty gesture; inner purification without outward simplicity is still genuine.

“Are the brahmavihāras a form of meditation or an ethical practice?” Both. In the canonical framework, the brahmavihāras are formally cultivated in sitting meditation — the monk sits, establishes mindfulness, and systematically pervades each direction with loving-kindness, compassion, appreciative joy, or equanimity. But they are also meant to inform all of daily life. The formal practice trains the capacity; the daily practice applies it. In some discourses (DN 13, for example), the brahmavihāras are presented as a path to rebirth in the Brahmā world; in others, they serve as the emotional foundation for liberating insight.

“Can this discourse stand alone as a complete teaching?” Yes. MN 40 is one of the most self-contained discourses in the collection. A person who took this discourse as their sole guide — honestly identifying their inner impurities, working to abandon them, and cultivating the four boundless states — would be practicing the heart of the Buddha’s teaching. This is what makes MN 40 an excellent entry point for new readers, especially those drawn to the ethical and emotional dimensions of the path.

Key terms

samaṇa — ascetic; recluse. One who has “stilled” (samita) unwholesome qualities. The discourse redefines the term: a true ascetic is not known by appearance but by inner purification.
brahmavihāra — divine abiding; boundless state. The four qualities — loving-kindness, compassion, appreciative joy, and equanimity — cultivated to pervade the entire world without limit.
mettā — loving-kindness; goodwill. The wish for all beings to be happy. Not an emotion that arises on its own but a trained mental quality that is systematically extended to all beings without exception.
karuṇā — compassion. The wish for all beings to be free from suffering. The appropriate response to the pain of others — not sorrow or pity but a warm, active concern.
muditā — appreciative joy; sympathetic joy. Joy in the happiness and success of others. The direct antidote to envy and stinginess.
upekkhā — equanimity. A balanced, impartial awareness that sees all beings with equal care. Not indifference or detachment but a stable composure that can hold joy and sorrow alike without being shaken.
micchādiṭṭhi — wrong view. The last and deepest of the impurities listed. Wrong view is the root condition for all other unwholesome qualities; right view is the condition for their abandonment.

The text

MN 40 is a compact discourse. The list of impurities follows a repeating formula, condensed where indicated. The four brahmavihāras are given in full. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The challenge

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying in the Aṅga country, where there is a town of the Aṅgans named Assapura.

§2There the Buddha addressed the monks: “Monks, people call you ‘ascetics, ascetics.’ And when asked, ‘What are you?’, you claim to be ascetics. Since you are so designated and so claim, you should train like this: ‘We will practice the way that is proper for ascetics, so that our designation will be true and our claim genuine, and the services of those whose robes, almsfood, lodging, and medicines we use will be of great fruit and benefit, and our going forth will not be in vain, but fruitful and fertile.’”

External marks do not suffice

§3“And what, monks, is the way that is not proper for ascetics? If a monk who has covetousness and unrighteous greed has not abandoned covetousness and unrighteous greed; if a monk who has ill will and hatred has not abandoned ill will and hatred — that is the way not proper for ascetics.”

The impurities to abandon

§4“Monks, when a monk has covetousness and unrighteous greed, that is an impure quality in an ascetic. When a monk has ill will and hatred, that is an impure quality in an ascetic. When a monk has anger, that is an impure quality. When a monk has hostility … contempt … a domineering attitude … envy … stinginess … deceit … fraud … evil desires … wrong view — that is an impure quality in an ascetic.”

For each impurity, the same formula: “A monk knows: ‘I have this impure quality’ — this is how they understand. They make an effort to abandon it. When they have abandoned it, they know: ‘I do not have this impure quality’ — this too is how they understand.” The text repeats this for all twelve impurities: covetousness and unrighteous greed, ill will and hatred, anger, hostility, contempt, a domineering attitude, envy, stinginess, deceit, fraud, evil desires, and wrong view.

§5“Monks, suppose a person who is not blind were to look at their own reflection in a clear, unclouded mirror or bowl of water. If they saw dirt or a blemish on their face, they would try to remove it. If they saw no dirt or blemish, they would be glad: ‘How fortunate that I am clean!’ In the same way, when a monk examines themselves and sees any of these impure qualities, they make an effort to abandon them. And when they no longer see any of these impure qualities, they are glad and train further.”

The four brahmavihāras

§6“When a monk has abandoned these impure qualities and sees in themselves their absence, gladness is born. From gladness, rapture is born. With a rapturous mind, the body becomes tranquil. When the body is tranquil, they feel pleasure. And with pleasure, the mind becomes composed.”

§7“They pervade one direction with a mind full of loving-kindness, then the second direction, the third, and the fourth. In the same way above, below, all around, everywhere — the whole world. They pervade it with a mind full of loving-kindness — abundant, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without ill will.”

§8“They pervade one direction with a mind full of compassion, then the second direction, the third, and the fourth. In the same way above, below, all around, everywhere — the whole world. They pervade it with a mind full of compassion — abundant, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without ill will.”

§9“They pervade one direction with a mind full of appreciative joy, then the second direction, the third, and the fourth. In the same way above, below, all around, everywhere — the whole world. They pervade it with a mind full of appreciative joy — abundant, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without ill will.”

§10“They pervade one direction with a mind full of equanimity, then the second direction, the third, and the fourth. In the same way above, below, all around, everywhere — the whole world. They pervade it with a mind full of equanimity — abundant, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without ill will.”

The inner bathing

§11“Monks, suppose there were a lake in a mountain hollow, clear, transparent, and unclouded. A person with good eyesight standing on the bank would see the shells, gravel, pebbles, and the schools of fish swimming about and resting. They would think: ‘This lake is clear, transparent, and unclouded. I can see the shells, gravel, pebbles, and fish.’ In the same way, a monk who has abandoned these impure qualities and pervaded the world with the four brahmavihāras sees their own mind as purified.”

§12“Monks, this is called a monk who has bathed with the inner bathing.”

§13At that time the brahmin Sundarika Bhāradvāja was sitting in the assembly. He said to the Buddha: “But does Master Gotama go to the Bahu River to bathe?”

“Why the Bahu River, brahmin? What can the Bahu River do?”

“Master Gotama, the Bahu River is regarded by many people as purifying, as holy. Many people wash away their bad deeds in the Bahu River.”

§14Then the Buddha addressed Sundarika Bhāradvāja in verse:

“A fool may bathe in rivers evermore —
what can mere water do for one who acts in evil ways?
One who is clean, whose conduct is pure —
for them it is always the holy day.”

When this was said, Sundarika Bhāradvāja said: “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! As if one were to set upright what had been overturned … I go to Master Gotama for refuge, to the teaching, and to the Saṅgha. May I receive the going forth in Master Gotama’s presence?”

And Sundarika Bhāradvāja received the going forth, the full ordination. Not long after his ordination, dwelling alone, withdrawn, diligent, ardent, and resolute, he realized the supreme goal of the spiritual life in this very lifetime. He understood: “Birth is ended, the spiritual life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more coming back to any state of being.”

And Venerable Sundarika Bhāradvāja became one of the perfected ones.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
According to the Buddha, what does NOT make someone a true ascetic?
Correct: C. The Buddha explicitly states that external marks — shaved head, robes, ashes, ritual bathing — are insufficient. A person can perform all these austerities while still harboring inner impurities. What makes a true ascetic is internal purification: abandoning greed, hatred, anger, and the other impure qualities.
Question 2 of 10
What is the first step in dealing with an inner impurity, according to this discourse?
Correct: B. The discourse’s method begins with honest self-recognition. For each impurity, the monk first acknowledges: “I have this.” This is not shame but clarity — the mirror simile makes this explicit. Only after recognition does the monk make the effort to abandon the quality. The sequence is: recognize, make effort, abandon, verify.
Question 3 of 10
Which of the following is the last impurity in the list?
Correct: D. Wrong view (micchādiṭṭhi) comes last because it is the deepest and most consequential impurity. Wrong view is the root condition for all other unwholesome qualities: a person who misunderstands reality will naturally generate greed, hatred, and the rest. Correcting wrong view is therefore the most fundamental purification.
Question 4 of 10
What simile does the Buddha use for the process of self-examination?
Correct: A. The mirror simile is perfectly chosen. Looking in a mirror is not self-judgment but self-knowledge: you see what is there, and if there is a blemish, you remove it. If there is no blemish, you are glad. The same applies to inner purification: the monk examines themselves honestly, removes what is unwholesome, and rejoices when the mind is clean.
Question 5 of 10
What arises in sequence after the impurities are abandoned?
Correct: C. The sequence is: gladness → rapture → bodily tranquility → pleasure → composure. This is a natural unfolding: when the impurities are gone, the mind naturally feels glad; gladness produces rapture; rapture calms the body; a calm body feels pleasure; and pleasure composes the mind. This composed mind is the platform from which the brahmavihāras are developed.
Question 6 of 10
What are the four brahmavihāras taught in this discourse?
Correct: A. The four brahmavihāras (“divine abidings”) are: mettā (loving-kindness), karuṇā (compassion), muditā (appreciative joy), and upekkhā (equanimity). Each is pervaded “in all directions — above, below, all around, everywhere — the whole world,” without limit, without hostility, without ill will.
Question 7 of 10
How are the brahmavihāras described in terms of their scope?
Correct: B. The formula insists on boundlessness. The monk pervades “one direction, then the second, the third, and the fourth — above, below, all around, everywhere — the whole world.” No being is excluded. The words “measureless” and “without hostility” ensure that the quality is not selective: it reaches enemies and strangers as fully as it reaches friends.
Question 8 of 10
What simile illustrates the purified mind after the brahmavihāras?
Correct: D. The clear lake simile captures the transparency of the purified mind: just as a person with good eyesight can see everything in a clear, unclouded lake, the monk can see their own mind as purified. The impurities are gone; what remains is visible all the way to the bottom. This is what the Buddha calls “the inner bathing.”
Question 9 of 10
What does the brahmin Sundarika Bhāradvāja ask the Buddha?
Correct: A. The brahmin’s question sets up the discourse’s final point. Many people believe that bathing in a holy river purifies them of bad deeds. The Buddha’s response — “What can mere water do for one who acts in evil ways?” — drives home the teaching: real purification is internal, not ritual. Sundarika Bhāradvāja is so moved that he asks for ordination on the spot.
Question 10 of 10
How does MN 40 relate to MN 39?
Correct: C. The two discourses are complementary, not competing. MN 39 is the “wisdom path”: the full graduated training culminating in the jhānas and three true knowledges. MN 40 is the “heart path”: ethical purification culminating in the four boundless states. Both are set at Assapura, both begin with the same challenge, but they approach the answer from different angles.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0