Majjhima Nikāya · Discourse 46

The Longer Discourse on Taking Up Practices

Mahādhammasamādānasutta

Setting
Sāvatthī, in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery
Speakers
The Buddha and the monks
Form
Teaching to monks — the same four ways of taking up practices as MN 45, now elaborated with the parable of ignorance and knowledge, an extended critique of misguided asceticism, and a meditation-based account of the highest practice.
Length
~18 minutes to read
Northern parallel
MĀ 175 (Madhyama-āgama 175)
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — accessible. Builds on the clear framework of MN 45 with richer detail. The extended descriptions of misguided asceticism and the jhāna-based path make this a rewarding complement to the shorter version.

Why this discourse, forty-sixth

MN 46 is the longer twin of MN 45. The same four-cell matrix — practices analyzed by whether they are pleasant or painful now, and whether they ripen in pleasure or pain — is now elaborated with extended descriptions and a powerful opening parable about ignorance and knowledge.

The key addition is the discourse’s opening diagnosis: most beings do not know what is good for them. They take up practices that are harmful, thinking they are beneficial. They avoid practices that are beneficial, thinking they are harmful. This is not mere foolishness; it is the structural consequence of ignorance. Without understanding the four types, a person cannot make wise choices — they are navigating by immediate feeling alone, like someone choosing food by taste without knowing whether it is nutritious or poisonous.

MN 46 also elaborates the four types with different content from MN 45. Where MN 45 used the ten courses of action as its primary examples, MN 46 gives extended descriptions of misguided asceticism (Type 1), sensual indulgence (Type 2), and the jhāna-based path to liberation (Types 3 and 4). The discourse thus covers a wider range of spiritual practices and helps the reader evaluate not just ethical conduct but the full spectrum of religious and meditative approaches.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Most beings, blinded by ignorance, take up harmful practices thinking they are beneficial and avoid beneficial practices thinking they are harmful — only understanding the four types of practice (classified by present feeling and future result) enables wise choice.

The structure of the discourse

SectionWhat happens
1. The diagnosisThe Buddha announces: most beings do not know what practices are for their welfare and what are for their harm. Because of this, they take up the harmful and avoid the beneficial.
2. Four types definedThe same four types as MN 45, now stated as the framework for what follows.
3. Type 1: Painful now, painful laterExtended description of misguided asceticism: going naked, refusing seats, eating only certain foods, practising self-mortification in various forms. Because of wrong view, this practice leads to a bad rebirth.
4. Type 2: Pleasant now, painful laterSomeone who delights in sensual pleasures and acts on the ten unwholesome courses of action. The pleasure is real but the karmic result is bad rebirth.
5. Type 3: Painful now, pleasant laterSomeone with strong underlying tendencies to lust, ill will, or ignorance who practises with difficulty — enduring painful feelings and distress — and through that difficult practice develops the path and attains liberation.
6. Type 4: Pleasant now, pleasant laterSomeone without strong underlying tendencies who practises with ease — entering the four jhānas naturally, experiencing deep happiness — and through that joyful practice attains liberation.
7. ConclusionThe Buddha reaffirms the four types and calls on the monks to understand them.

What MN 46 adds beyond MN 45

1. The opening diagnosis of ignorance. MN 45 simply presents the four types. MN 46 begins with the problem: beings do not know which practices are beneficial and which are harmful. This is not a moral failing but an epistemic one — ignorance (avijjā) is the root cause. The entire framework of four types is presented as a tool for overcoming this ignorance.

2. The extended description of misguided asceticism. Type 1 in MN 46 includes a long catalogue of ascetic practices: going naked, refusing to accept food in certain ways, sleeping on the ground, standing for long periods, eating dung, and many others. This list is found in several places in the canon (notably MN 12 and MN 51) and represents the Buddha’s systematic critique of the non-Buddhist ascetic traditions of his time. The point is not that all austerity is wrong, but that austerity practiced out of wrong view — without understanding why one is doing it — is doubly painful: painful now and painful in its karmic result.

3. The jhāna-based account of Types 3 and 4. In MN 45, Types 3 and 4 are described in terms of the ten courses of action. In MN 46, they are described in terms of meditation practice. Type 3 is someone who practises with difficulty — struggling against strong defilements, enduring painful feelings — but who perseveres and eventually attains the destruction of the taints. Type 4 is someone whose defilements are naturally weak, who enters the jhānas with ease, and who attains liberation through a smooth, joyful practice. Both reach the same goal; the difference is in the difficulty of the journey.

The two paths to the same goal

The distinction between Types 3 and 4 is psychologically important. The Buddha recognizes that practitioners differ in temperament. Some people struggle intensely with desire, anger, or confusion; their practice is hard. Others have a lighter touch; their practice flows naturally. Both can attain liberation. The discourse does not rank one above the other — it simply observes that the same goal can be reached by different routes, depending on the practitioner’s underlying tendencies.

This is a compassionate observation. It means that a person whose practice feels difficult and painful should not conclude that they are on the wrong path. They may be on Type 3 — a practice that is painful now but will ripen in the highest pleasure, the pleasure of liberation. The difficulty of the practice is not evidence of failure but a reflection of the strength of the defilements being overcome.

The critique of asceticism

MN 46’s long description of ascetic practices serves a specific purpose. It distinguishes the Buddha’s path from the self-mortification practices common in Indian religious life. The Buddha is not against effort, discipline, or renunciation — Type 3 involves all of these. He is against practices undertaken without understanding. The naked ascetic who refuses food, sleeps on thorns, and covers himself in ashes is not wrong because his practice is painful; he is wrong because his practice is grounded in wrong view. He does not understand why he is suffering or what his suffering will produce. Pain without purpose is not training; it is just pain.

Key terms

dhammasamādāna — taking up a practice; undertaking a way of life. The same term as MN 45. The “longer” (mahā) version elaborates each type with richer content.
avijjā — ignorance. In this discourse, specifically the ignorance that prevents beings from distinguishing beneficial practices from harmful ones. The opening diagnosis: beings do not know what is for their welfare.
tapas — austerity; ascetic practice; self-mortification. The long catalogue of ascetic practices in Type 1 represents what the Buddha called “self-mortification” (attakilamathānuyoga) — one of the two extremes the middle way avoids.
jhāna — meditative absorption. In Types 3 and 4, the four jhānas are the vehicle for liberation. The difference between Types 3 and 4 is not the method but the ease of entry: Type 3 enters with difficulty, Type 4 with ease.
anusaya — underlying tendency; latent disposition. The key variable that determines whether a practitioner follows Type 3 or Type 4. Someone with strong underlying tendencies (to lust, ill will, or ignorance) practises with difficulty; someone with weak tendencies practises with ease.
āsavakkhaya — the destruction of the taints; the ending of the defilements. The shared goal of Types 3 and 4. Both reach the same liberation; the difference is in the journey, not the destination.

The text

MN 46 is longer than MN 45. The opening diagnosis and the four types are given in full; the long catalogue of ascetic practices in Type 1 is condensed. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The diagnosis of ignorance

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī, in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.

§2There the Buddha addressed the monks: “Monks, for the most part, beings do not know, as they really are, which practices are for their welfare and which are for their harm.”

“Because of this, beings take up practices that are for their harm, not for their welfare. They do not take up practices that are for their welfare, not for their harm. Because they take up practices that are for their harm and do not take up practices that are for their welfare, those who wish for their welfare come to harm, and those who wish to avoid harm come to harm.”

§3“But, monks, if beings knew, as they really are, which practices are for their welfare and which are for their harm, they would take up practices that are for their welfare and would not take up practices that are for their harm. Because of this, those who wish for their welfare would come to welfare, and those who wish to avoid harm would avoid harm.”

§4“Monks, there are these four ways of taking up practices. What four? There is a taking up of a practice that is painful now and ripens in pain. There is a taking up of a practice that is pleasant now but ripens in pain. There is a taking up of a practice that is painful now but ripens in pleasure. And there is a taking up of a practice that is pleasant now and ripens in pleasure.”

Type 1: Painful now, painful later

§5“And what, monks, is the taking up of a practice that is painful now and ripens in pain?”

“Here, someone goes naked, rejecting convention, licking their hands after eating, not coming when asked, not standing when asked. They do not accept food brought to them, food specially prepared, or an invitation to a meal.”

The discourse gives an extended catalogue of ascetic practices: eating only once a day, or once every two days, or once every seven days; eating only certain kinds of food; wearing robes of hemp, rags, bark, antelope skin, or grass; pulling out hair and beard; standing continuously; squatting continuously; sleeping on beds of thorns, boards, or bare ground; lying on one side only; smearing the body with dust and dirt; living in the open air in all seasons. These are practised as religious observances.

“They experience painful, sharp, severe, piercing feelings because of these practices. When the body breaks up, after death, they are reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the lower world, hell. This is the taking up of a practice that is painful now and ripens in pain.”

Type 2: Pleasant now, painful later

§6“And what is the taking up of a practice that is pleasant now but ripens in pain?”

“Here, someone kills living beings and in doing so experiences pleasure and happiness. They take what is not given … commit sexual misconduct … speak falsely … speak divisively … speak harshly … engage in idle chatter … are covetous … have ill will … hold wrong view, and in doing so they experience pleasure and happiness.”

“When the body breaks up, after death, they are reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the lower world, hell. This is the taking up of a practice that is pleasant now but ripens in pain.”

Type 3: Painful now, pleasant later

§7“And what is the taking up of a practice that is painful now but ripens in pleasure?”

“Here, someone has a strong underlying tendency to lust. They often experience the pain and sadness born of lust. They have a strong underlying tendency to ill will. They often experience the pain and sadness born of ill will. They have a strong underlying tendency to ignorance. They often experience the pain and sadness born of ignorance.”

“With tears streaming down their face, they live the full and purified spiritual life. When the body breaks up, after death, they are reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. Or they might, in this very lifetime, with the destruction of the taints, realize for themselves with direct knowledge the taintless freedom of mind, freedom by wisdom. This is the taking up of a practice that is painful now but ripens in pleasure.”

Type 4: Pleasant now, pleasant later

§8“And what is the taking up of a practice that is pleasant now and ripens in pleasure?”

“Here, someone does not have a strong underlying tendency to lust. They do not often experience the pain and sadness born of lust. They do not have a strong underlying tendency to ill will. They do not often experience the pain and sadness born of ill will. They do not have a strong underlying tendency to ignorance. They do not often experience the pain and sadness born of ignorance.”

“Quite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unwholesome qualities, they enter and dwell in the first jhāna, which is accompanied by applied thought and sustained thought, with rapture and happiness born of seclusion.”

The same formula is given for the second, third, and fourth jhānas. With the stilling of applied and sustained thought, they enter the second jhāna … with the fading away of rapture, the third jhāna … with the abandoning of pleasure and pain, the fourth jhāna, purified by equanimity and mindfulness.

“When the body breaks up, after death, they are reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. Or they might, in this very lifetime, with the destruction of the taints, realize for themselves with direct knowledge the taintless freedom of mind, freedom by wisdom. This is the taking up of a practice that is pleasant now and ripens in pleasure.”

§9“These, monks, are the four ways of taking up practices.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is the key addition in MN 46 compared to MN 45?
Correct: B. MN 46’s distinctive contribution is its opening analysis of ignorance: beings take up harmful practices thinking they are beneficial, and avoid beneficial practices thinking they are harmful. This frames the four types not just as a classification but as a diagnostic tool for overcoming the ignorance that causes poor choices.
Question 2 of 10
According to the discourse, why do most beings take up harmful practices?
Correct: A. The Buddha’s diagnosis is epistemic, not moral. Beings make poor choices not because they are bad people but because they lack understanding. They do not know which practices lead to welfare and which lead to harm. The solution is knowledge — understanding the four types — not moral condemnation.
Question 3 of 10
What example does MN 46 give for the practice that is painful now and painful later (Type 1)?
Correct: D. Type 1 in MN 46 is illustrated by an extended catalogue of misguided ascetic practices. The person suffers now (extreme physical deprivation) and suffers later (bad rebirth). The key factor is wrong view: the ascetic does not understand why they are doing what they are doing, so the painful practice produces no beneficial result.
Question 4 of 10
What distinguishes the practitioner of Type 3 (painful now, pleasant later) from the practitioner of Type 4 (pleasant now, pleasant later)?
Correct: C. The key variable is the strength of one’s underlying tendencies (anusaya). A person with strong defilements must work harder — their practice is painful, even tearful. A person with weaker defilements enters the jhānas with ease and practises joyfully. Both can attain the same liberation; the difference is in temperament, not in method or goal.
Question 5 of 10
What meditation practice does the Buddha describe for Type 4 (pleasant now, pleasant later)?
Correct: A. The Buddha describes Type 4 as entering the four jhānas — each successively deeper and more refined — with ease and natural joy. The jhānas represent the paradigm of practice that is pleasant both in the doing (the rapture and happiness of absorption) and in its result (liberation from the taints).
Question 6 of 10
The Buddha describes someone who practises “with tears streaming down their face.” Which type of practice is this?
Correct: B. The tearful practitioner belongs to Type 3. They struggle intensely with strong defilements — lust, ill will, ignorance — but they persevere. Their practice is genuinely painful, but it ripens in the highest pleasure: liberation. The tears are not a sign of failure but of the difficulty of the battle being won.
Question 7 of 10
What is the Buddha’s critique of the ascetic practices described in Type 1?
Correct: D. The Buddha does not oppose all difficulty or effort. He opposes practice without understanding. The misguided ascetic inflicts pain on themselves without knowing why, grounded in wrong view about the nature of purification. Pain without purpose is not training — it is just pain. The key factor is right view, not the absence of discomfort.
Question 8 of 10
Do the practitioners of Type 3 and Type 4 reach the same goal?
Correct: C. Both Type 3 and Type 4 can attain “the destruction of the taints, the taintless freedom of mind, freedom by wisdom, in this very lifetime.” The destination is identical. The difference is in the difficulty of the journey: one practises with tears, the other with joy. The discourse does not privilege one route over the other.
Question 9 of 10
Which extreme does the Buddha’s critique of Type 1 asceticism represent?
Correct: A. The ascetic practices of Type 1 are precisely what the Buddha calls attakilamathānuyoga — devotion to self-mortification. This is one of the two extremes he rejected in his first sermon. The other extreme is sensual indulgence, represented here by Type 2. The middle way (Types 3 and 4) avoids both.
Question 10 of 10
What is the relationship between MN 45 and MN 46?
Correct: B. MN 46 is the “longer” twin of MN 45 — the same four-cell matrix, now elaborated. MN 45 uses the ten courses of action and food similes. MN 46 uses ascetic practices for Type 1, and the jhāna progression for Types 3–4, and adds the opening diagnosis of ignorance. Together they give a comprehensive treatment of the framework.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0