Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 1.44

One Root

Ekamūlasutta

Setting
Not narrated in this discourse's source text; presumably the same recurring frame as the rest of this vagga
Speakers
Not named explicitly; a single riddle-verse with no question, no reply, and no narrator's frame at all
Form
One four-line verse only, entirely self-contained
Length
~15 seconds to read
Difficulty
★★★★★ — this collection's most compressed and genuinely obscure verse, left unglossed by the text itself
An unanswered riddle
Unlike this collection's other numerical riddles (SN 1.5, SN 1.6), this one receives no reply from anyone — the verse simply is the whole discourse

Why this discourse

This is the shortest and most opaque discourse in this collection so far: a single sealed verse, with no speaker identified, no question posed to anyone, and no answer given anywhere in the text. It describes an abyss defined by a series of numbers — one root, two loops, three stains, five spreads, and an ocean as a twelfth whirlpool — crossed, it says, by ‘the seer.’ What each number refers to is not stated, and this reading guide does not supply a confident answer where the text itself gives none.

Reading guide

A riddle with no one to answer it

SN 1.5 and SN 1.6, this collection's earlier numerical riddles, are both asked by a deity and directly answered by the Buddha. This discourse breaks that pattern entirely: there is no questioner, no respondent, and no narrative frame of any kind — just the verse itself, presented without commentary.

Numbers without stated referents

The verse names a root (one), loops (two), stains (three), spreads (five), and a twelfth whirlpool called the ocean, all forming an abyss (pātāla) that ‘the seer’ (muni) crosses. Commentarial tradition offers allegorical readings for some of these terms — the three stains, for instance, are commonly read elsewhere in the canon as greed, hatred, and delusion — but the precise referents for several of the other numbers, particularly the two loops and the five spreads, are genuinely debated even within traditional exegesis, and this reading guide does not assert a specific identification where the commentarial record itself is uncertain.

A structure, if not a content, that is legible

Even without confidently unpacking each number, the verse's shape is clear: a sequence of increasing quantities — one, two, three, five, twelve — builds toward a single image, an abyss or ocean, that poses a genuine obstacle, and that only ‘the seer’ is said to cross. The verse asserts that this crossing is possible without explaining the terrain in terms a casual reader could reconstruct.

Honesty about the limits of this reading guide

This project's consistent practice, when a passage's meaning is genuinely unsettled rather than merely unfamiliar, is to say so plainly rather than supply a confident-sounding gloss the source itself doesn't support. This discourse is one of the clearest instances of that practice in this collection so far: better to name the uncertainty than to manufacture false clarity.

Key terms

ekamūla — “one root” — the verse's first numbered element, and this discourse's title.
dvirāvaṭṭaṁ — “two loops, two whirls” — the verse's second numbered element, its precise referent debated in traditional exegesis.
timalaṁ — “three stains” — commonly read elsewhere in the canon as greed, hatred, and delusion, though this specific verse doesn't state that identification directly.
pātālaṁ — “abyss” — the verse's central image, defined by the full sequence of numbers it lists.
muni — “the seer, the sage” — the one the verse says crosses this abyss, left otherwise unidentified.

The text

The discourse in full: a single sealed riddle-verse, presented here exactly as it is in the source, without an invented resolution. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“One the root, two the loops, three the stains, five the spreads, and the ocean, the twelfth whirlpool: such is the abyss crossed by the seer.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does this discourse differ from SN 1.5 and SN 1.6, this collection's earlier numerical riddles?
Correct: A. A complete break from the deity-asks, Buddha-answers pattern.
Question 2 of 10
What sequence of numbers does the verse name?
Correct: A. A building sequence culminating in an ocean-sized abyss.
Question 3 of 10
Who does the verse say crosses this abyss?
Correct: A. The verse's only description of who succeeds.
Question 4 of 10
Does this reading guide assert confident identifications for every numbered term?
Correct: A. An explicit practice of honesty about genuine interpretive uncertainty.
Question 5 of 10
What are the 'three stains' commonly read as elsewhere in the canon?
Correct: A. A common triad elsewhere, though this specific verse doesn't state the identification directly.
Question 6 of 10
What image does the verse build toward?
Correct: A. The verse's culminating image, crossed only by the seer.
Question 7 of 10
How long is this discourse compared to most others in this collection?
Correct: A. One sealed verse, with no narrative frame at all.
Question 8 of 10
What does 'muni' mean?
Correct: A. The verse's only named agent, who successfully crosses the abyss.
Question 9 of 10
Is this discourse's meaning fully settled among translators and commentators?
Correct: A. Genuine, acknowledged uncertainty, not merely unfamiliarity.
Question 10 of 10
What is the setting of this discourse?
Correct: A. The most minimal presentation of any discourse in this collection so far.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0