Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 10.2

Sakka In Name Only

Sakkanāmasutta

Setting
Near Rājagaha, on Vulture's Peak Mountain
Speakers
A spirit "Sakka in name only" and the Buddha
Form
A philosophical challenge about teaching after liberation, met with a precise distinction
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — compact, addressing a genuine tension in the idea of a liberated teacher

Why this discourse

This spirit's very name carries a built-in qualification: the text identifies him explicitly as ‘Sakka in name only’, distinct from the actual deity-king Sakka who appears elsewhere in this collection. His challenge to the Buddha raises a genuine philosophical tension: if you've given up all ties and are fully free, why would it make sense for you to keep instructing others at all? Doesn't teaching imply some remaining investment, some tie not yet cut? The Buddha's answer doesn't deny the premise of his own freedom; it draws a precise distinction between the kind of engagement that creates bondage and the kind that doesn't, identifying compassion itself as capable of operating without attachment.

Reading guide

A name that pre-emptively qualifies its own bearer

The discourse's title and opening line both specify ‘Sakka in name only’, a detail this reading guide takes as a deliberate signal distinguishing this spirit from the actual Sakka, ruler of the Thirty-Three gods, appearing elsewhere in this collection.

A challenge with real philosophical bite

The question isn't a simple provocation; it names a genuine tension found across contemplative traditions — if liberation means being free of all ties, how does continued engagement with others, especially through active teaching, fit that description?

A reply that doesn't dispute the premise of freedom

The Buddha's answer doesn't argue that he's somehow not fully free; it accepts the framing of complete liberation and locates the resolution elsewhere entirely — in the specific nature of the engagement itself, not in denying the underlying freedom.

Sympathy named as an obligation, not an optional extra

The verse's first response doesn't merely permit compassion for others; it states that failing to feel sympathy for those one encounters is ‘unworthy for a wise person’, treating such sympathy as basic to wisdom rather than a separate, additional virtue.

A precise mechanism distinguishing compassion from attachment

The closing lines don't just assert that teaching is fine; they specify the actual condition under which it avoids creating bondage — a mind that is clear and confident, where compassion and empathy themselves ‘don't create attachments’, locating the difference in the quality of mind behind the action rather than the action itself.

Key terms

sakkanāmako yakkho — “a spirit who was Sakka in name only” — explicitly distinguishing this figure from the actual deity Sakka.
sabbaganthappahīnassa, vippamuttassa — “given up all ties, and fully freed” — the spirit's own premise about the Buddha's attainment.
samaṇassa na taṁ sādhu, yadaññamanusāsasi — “it's not a good idea for you, ascetic, to be instructing others” — the challenge itself.
na taṁ arahati sappañño, manasā anukampituṁ — “it's unworthy for a wise person not to think of the other with sympathy” — the Buddha's counter-principle.
na tena hoti saṁyutto, yānukampā anuddayā — “your compassion and empathy don't create attachments” — the precise mechanism resolving the challenge.

The text

The discourse in full. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, on the Vulture’s Peak Mountain. Then a spirit who was Sakka in name only went up to the Buddha, and addressed him in verse:

§2“You’ve given up all ties, and are fully freed. It’s not a good idea for you, ascetic, to be instructing others.”

§3“No matter how you explain why people gather together, Sakka, it’s unworthy for a wise person not to think of the other with sympathy.

§4If you instruct others with a mind clear and confident, your compassion and empathy don’t create attachments.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does the discourse specify about the spirit who challenges the Buddha?
Correct: A. A deliberate distinction from the Sakka who appears elsewhere in this collection.
Question 2 of 10
What challenge does this spirit raise?
Correct: A. A genuine philosophical tension about liberation and continued engagement.
Question 3 of 10
How does the Buddha's reply handle the premise that he is fully free?
Correct: A. Not disputing the underlying claim of complete liberation.
Question 4 of 10
How does the Buddha characterize failing to feel sympathy for others?
Correct: A. Treating sympathy as basic to wisdom itself, not an optional addition.
Question 5 of 10
What condition does the Buddha specify for teaching to avoid creating attachment?
Correct: A. Locating the difference in the quality of mind behind the action.
Question 6 of 10
What does the Buddha claim about compassion and empathy specifically?
Correct: A. The precise mechanism resolving the spirit's challenge.
Question 7 of 10
Where does this discourse take place?
Correct: A. A different Rājagaha-area location from SN 10.1's Indakūṭa.
Question 8 of 10
How does this discourse's challenge compare to a common tension in contemplative traditions?
Correct: A. A genuine question found across traditions about the liberated teacher.
Question 9 of 10
Does the Buddha's reply deny that teaching involves any relationship with others?
Correct: A. Accepting the engagement while distinguishing its quality from binding attachment.
Question 10 of 10
What is the structural relationship between this discourse and SN 10.1?
Correct: A. Continuing the saṃyutta's opening pattern of substantive philosophical inquiry from yakkhas.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0