Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 11.20

Who Sakka Worships

Saṅghavandanāsutta

Setting
Sāvatthī — the Buddha narrating a story from the world of the gods
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants; within the story, Sakka and his charioteer Mātali
Form
A narrated episode closing this saṃyutta's second chapter, the third and most pointed installment of the "Who Sakka Worships" trilogy
Length
~3.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — the sharpest challenge and fullest answer in the trilogy it closes

Why this discourse

Where SN 11.18 and SN 11.19 have Mātali question Sakka's reverence with curiosity, this closing installment sharpens the challenge into something closer to mockery: the mendicants, Mātali says, are humans stuck in putrid bodies, sunk in a carcass, stricken by hunger and thirst — so why does Sakka envy their homeless life at all? Sakka's answer doesn't deflect the description; it directly reclaims it, praising exactly the non-attachment, the freedom from storerooms and possessions, and the refusal to fight even amid a world of conflict, that Mātali had just called wretched.

Reading guide

The sharpest challenge in the trilogy

SN 11.18 and SN 11.19 have Mātali ask his question with simple curiosity; here his framing is openly unflattering, describing the mendicants' bodies in blunt, unpleasant terms before asking why Sakka would envy such a life at all.

Envy named explicitly, not merely reverence

Unlike the earlier two discourses, Mātali doesn't just ask who Sakka worships; he specifically accuses Sakka of envy toward the homeless, a sharper and more personal framing of the same underlying question.

A description reclaimed rather than denied

Sakka doesn't dispute Mātali's unflattering physical description or soften it; he simply answers with what actually earns his admiration — qualities of conduct and freedom, not physical comfort.

Non-attachment described in concrete, specific terms

Sakka's praise isn't abstract; he names precisely what he admires — leaving a village without concern, hoarding nothing in storerooms or baskets, living on food prepared by others while keeping their vows.

A closing image of non-violence amid universal conflict

The discourse's final image widens the frame beyond personal virtue: gods fight titans and mortals fight each other, yet the mendicants Sakka praises remain unfighting even among those who fight — a fitting closing note for the chapter and for the trilogy it completes.

Key terms

bhikkhusaṅghaṁ namassati — “revered the mendicant Saṅgha” — the third and most specific object of reverence across this trilogy of discourses.
pūtidehasayā narā… khuppipāsasamappitā — “humans stuck in their putrid bodies… stricken by hunger and thirst” — Mātali's unusually blunt, unflattering description of the mendicants.
kiṁ nu tesaṁ pihayasi, anāgārāna vāsava — “why then do you envy those who are homeless, Vāsava?” — Mātali's pointed challenge, framing Sakka's reverence as envy rather than mere admiration.
yamhā gāmā pakkamanti, anapekkhā vajanti te — “when they leave a village, they proceed without concern” — the core of Sakka's admiring description, on freedom from attachment.
aviruddhā viruddhesu, attadaṇḍesu nibbutā — “not fighting among those who fight, quenched among those who have taken up arms” — the climactic description, on non-violence amid a world of conflict.

The text

The discourse in full, closing Dutiyavagga's three-part “Who Sakka Worships” trilogy and this chapter. The chapter's closing summary verse, listing all ten discourse titles, is a structural index and is not reproduced as running prose here. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Once upon a time, mendicants, Sakka, lord of gods, addressed his chariot handler Mātali, ‘My dear Mātali, harness the chariot with its team of a thousand thoroughbreds. We will go to a park and see the scenery.’ ‘Yes, lord,’ replied Mātali. He harnessed the chariot and informed Sakka, ‘Good fellow, the chariot with its team of a thousand thoroughbreds has been harnessed. Please go at your convenience.’

§2Then Sakka descended from the Palace of Victory, raised his cupped palms, and revered the mendicant Saṅgha. So Mātali the chariot handler addressed Sakka in verse:

§3‘It’s these who should worship you, namely the humans stuck in their putrid bodies, sunk in a carcass, stricken by hunger and thirst. Why then do you envy those who are homeless, Vāsava? Relate the seers’ way of life, let us hear what you say.’

§4‘This is why I envy the homeless, Mātali. When they leave a village, they proceed without concern. They hoard no goods in storerooms, nor in pots or baskets. They seek food prepared by others, and, true to their vows, live on that.

§5The attentive, whose words are full of wisdom, live peacefully and quietly. Gods fight with titans, and mortals fight each other, Mātali. Not fighting among those who fight, quenched among those who have taken up arms, not grasping among those who grasp: they’re who I worship, Mātali.’

§6‘Those who you worship seem to be the best in the world, Sakka. I too will worship those who you worship, Vāsava.’ After saying this, Maghavā the chief, king of gods, Sujā’s husband, having worshipped the mendicant Saṅgha, climbed into his chariot.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does Mātali's challenge in this discourse differ from SN 11.18 and SN 11.19?
Correct: A. The sharpest challenge across the trilogy.
Question 2 of 10
How does Mātali describe the mendicants' bodies?
Correct: A. An unusually blunt, unflattering framing.
Question 3 of 10
What specific accusation does Mātali level at Sakka in this discourse?
Correct: A. A sharper, more personal framing than the earlier two discourses' simple curiosity.
Question 4 of 10
How does Sakka respond to Mātali's unflattering description?
Correct: A. A description reclaimed rather than denied or softened.
Question 5 of 10
What specific behavior does Sakka name as admirable about leaving a village?
Correct: A. Concrete, specific praise rather than abstract admiration.
Question 6 of 10
What do the mendicants NOT do, according to Sakka's description?
Correct: A. A concrete marker of their non-attachment to possessions.
Question 7 of 10
What closing image widens this discourse's frame beyond personal virtue?
Correct: A. A fitting closing image for both this discourse and the trilogy it completes.
Question 8 of 10
What does this discourse close, structurally, within Sakkasaṃyutta?
Correct: A. Confirmed by the chapter's closing summary verse.
Question 9 of 10
What is the underlying Pali title of this discourse?
Correct: A. Distinct from SN 11.18 and SN 11.19 despite sharing their English rendering.
Question 10 of 10
Where does the Buddha narrate this story to the monks?
Correct: A. The consistent setting across most of this saṃyutta's discourses.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0