Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 16.2

Imprudent

Anottappīsutta

Setting
Near Varanasi, in the deer park at Isipatana
Speakers
Venerable Sāriputta and Venerable Mahākassapa, in direct peer dialogue
Form
The full formal opening, a question, and a structured four-part explanation
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — a genuine doctrinal dialogue between two chief disciples, denser than SN 16.1

Why this discourse

Unlike SN 16.1, where the Buddha spoke about Kassapa, this discourse is a direct conversation between two of the Buddha's chief disciples, with no Buddha present at all. Sāriputta poses a claim to Kassapa: without being keen (ātāpī) and prudent (ottappī), awakening, extinguishment, and the supreme sanctuary from the yoke are impossible. Kassapa explains exactly what this means by walking through the four right efforts — preventing unarisen unskillful qualities, abandoning arisen ones, developing unarisen skillful qualities, and maintaining arisen ones — each one, Kassapa explains, requires an anxious, attentive awareness that neglect here leads to real harm.

Reading guide

A conversation between peers, not a teaching from above

This is the first discourse in this saṃyutta where the Buddha doesn't appear at all; two senior disciples discuss doctrine directly with each other, at a location, Isipatana, famous as the site of the first sermon.

Keenness and prudence explained through anxious diligence

Ātāpī and ottappī aren't defined abstractly; Kassapa explains them entirely through a specific pattern of thought — foreseeing that neglect of the four right efforts will lead to harm, and letting that foresight actively drive practice.

The four right efforts, present without being named

Preventing unarisen unskillful qualities, abandoning arisen unskillful qualities, developing unarisen skillful qualities, and maintaining arisen skillful qualities — the classic fourfold effort formula appears here in full, though the technical term sammappadhāna itself is never used.

The identical structure applied twice, to failure and success

Kassapa first explains anātāpī and anottappī (not keen, not prudent) through the absence of this thinking pattern, then explains ātāpī and ottappī through its presence — the same four right efforts, framed twice, once each way.

A discourse with no closing exhortation formula

Unlike SN 16.1's closing reference to Kassapa as a standard for others to follow, this discourse simply ends with Kassapa's answer — there's no Buddha present to draw the pedagogical conclusion the way SN 16.1's closing formula does.

Key terms

ātāpī, ottappī — “keen, prudent” — the two qualities Sāriputta's opening claim says are necessary for awakening, and this discourse's central subject.
sambodhi, nibbāna, anuttaraṁ yogakkhemaṁ — “awakening, extinguishment, the supreme sanctuary from the yoke” — the three attainments said to be unreachable without keenness and prudence.
anuppannā … pāpakā akusalā dhammā — “unarisen bad, unskillful qualities” — the first of four categories in the effort formula Kassapa's explanation walks through.
anatthāya saṁvatteyyuṁ — “would lead to harm” — the anticipatory thought pattern Kassapa identifies as the actual content of keenness and prudence.
isipatane migadāye — “in the deer park at Isipatana” — this discourse's setting near Varanasi, the site traditionally associated with the Buddha's first sermon.

The text

The discourse in full, including the source's own elision of the repeated effort-formula clauses. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1So I have heard. At one time Venerable Mahākassapa and Venerable Sāriputta were staying near Varanasi, in the deer park at Isipatana. Then in the late afternoon, Venerable Sāriputta came out of retreat, went to Venerable Mahākassapa, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to Mahākassapa: “Reverend Kassapa, it’s said that without being keen and prudent you can’t achieve awakening, extinguishment, and the supreme sanctuary from the yoke. But if you are keen and prudent you can achieve awakening, extinguishment, and the supreme sanctuary from the yoke.

§2To what extent is this the case?” “Reverend, take a mendicant who doesn’t foster keenness by thinking: ‘If unarisen unskillful qualities arise in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give up arisen unskillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give rise to unarisen skillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If arisen skillful qualities cease in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ That’s how you’re not keen.

§3And how are you not prudent? Take a mendicant who doesn’t foster prudence by thinking: ‘If unarisen unskillful qualities arise in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give up arisen unskillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give rise to unarisen skillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If arisen skillful qualities cease in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ That’s how you’re not prudent. That’s how without being keen and prudent you can’t achieve awakening, extinguishment, and the supreme sanctuary from the yoke.

§4And how are you keen? Take a mendicant who fosters keenness by thinking: ‘If unarisen unskillful qualities arise in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give up arisen unskillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give rise to unarisen skillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If arisen skillful qualities cease in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ That’s how you’re keen.

§5And how are you prudent? Take a mendicant who fosters prudence by thinking: ‘If unarisen unskillful qualities arise in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give up arisen unskillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If I don’t give rise to unarisen skillful qualities, they’ll lead to harm.’ ‘If arisen skillful qualities cease in me, they’ll lead to harm.’ That’s how you’re prudent. That’s how if you’re keen and prudent you can achieve awakening, extinguishment, and the supreme sanctuary from the yoke.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is genuinely different about this discourse's speakers, compared to SN 16.1?
Correct: A. A direct peer conversation between Sāriputta and Kassapa.
Question 2 of 10
What claim does Sāriputta open with?
Correct: A. The claim Kassapa then explains and unpacks in detail.
Question 3 of 10
How does Kassapa explain what keenness and prudence actually consist of?
Correct: A. Preventing, abandoning, developing, and maintaining, each driven by anticipated harm.
Question 4 of 10
Is the technical term "sammappadhāna" (right effort) used explicitly in this discourse?
Correct: A. The content of the classic formula, without its usual label.
Question 5 of 10
How many times does Kassapa apply the same fourfold structure, and to what?
Correct: A. The identical four right efforts, framed first negatively, then positively.
Question 6 of 10
How does this discourse end, compared to SN 16.1?
Correct: A. No Buddha present to draw the pedagogical conclusion SN 16.1 closed with.
Question 7 of 10
Where does this discourse take place?
Correct: A. The traditional site of the Buddha's first sermon.
Question 8 of 10
What three attainments does Sāriputta say require keenness and prudence?
Correct: A. Sambodhi, nibbāna, and anuttaraṁ yogakkhemaṁ.
Question 9 of 10
What opens this discourse, distinct from most discourses in this collection?
Correct: A. The complete traditional formula marking a discourse's beginning.
Question 10 of 10
What numbering tag closes this discourse?
Correct: A. The second discourse of this saṃyutta.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0