Reading guide
A historical contrast, not an abstract principle
The Buddha doesn't speak in generalities; he draws a direct before-and-after comparison between what senior mendicants used to honor and what they honor now, treating institutional change itself as the subject.
The same nine-quality list, now marking absence rather than presence
The identical list of ascetic virtues praised in SN 16.1 and SN 16.5 — wilderness-dwelling, almsfood, rag robes, few wishes, contentment, seclusion, aloofness, energy — reappears here, but now describing what senior mendicants have stopped practicing and stopped praising.
An exact structural inversion of welfare and harm
When juniors followed virtue-based honor, the text says explicitly it served “their lasting welfare and happiness”; when they follow fame-based honor instead, the identical sentence structure now says it serves “their lasting harm and suffering” — the same grammatical frame, opposite outcome.
Honor redirected from virtue to material success
The new criterion for a seat of honor isn't practice at all; it's being ñāto yasassī lābhī, well-known, famous, and a recipient of abundant material support — status measured by visibility and possessions rather than by discipline.
A warning about danger from within, not from outside
The Buddha's closing statement doesn't warn about external threats to the tradition; it names the possibility that spiritual practitioners could be endangered specifically by other spiritual practitioners — and states plainly that this danger is already present.
Key terms
The text
§1Near Rājagaha, in the squirrels’ feeding ground. Then Venerable Mahākassapa went up to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him: “Kassapa, advise the mendicants! Give them a Dhamma talk! Either you or I should advise the mendicants and give them a Dhamma talk.”
§2“Sir, the mendicants these days are hard to admonish, having qualities that make them hard to admonish. They’re impatient, and don’t take instruction respectfully.” “Kassapa, that’s because formerly the senior mendicants lived in the wilderness, ate only almsfood, wore rag robes, and owned just three robes; and they praised these things. They were of few wishes, content, secluded, aloof, and energetic; and they praised these things.
§3The senior mendicants invite such a mendicant to a seat, saying: ‘Welcome, mendicant! What is this mendicant’s name? This mendicant is good-natured; he really wants to train. Please, mendicant, here, take a seat.’
§4Then the junior mendicants think: ‘It seems that when a mendicant lives in the wilderness … and is energetic, and praises these things, senior mendicants invite them to a seat …’ They practice accordingly. That is for their lasting welfare and happiness.
§5But these days, Kassapa, the senior mendicants don’t live in the wilderness … and aren’t energetic; and they don’t praise these things.
§6When a mendicant is well-known and famous, a recipient of robes, almsfood, lodgings, and medicines and supplies for the sick, senior mendicants invite them to a seat: ‘Welcome, mendicant! What is this mendicant’s name? This mendicant is good-natured; he’s fond of his fellow monks. Please, mendicant, here, take a seat.’
§7Then the junior mendicants think: ‘It seems that when a mendicant is well-known and famous, a recipient of robes, almsfood, lodgings, and medicines and supplies for the sick, senior mendicants invite them to a seat …’ They practice accordingly. That is for their lasting harm and suffering. And if it could ever be rightly said that spiritual practitioners have been imperiled by the peril of a spiritual practitioner, and vanquished by the vanquishing of a spiritual practitioner, it is these days that this could be rightly said.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.