Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 20.5

A Spear

Sattisutta

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha, posing a question to the assembled mendicants and confirming their answer
Form
A physical impossibility used to describe futile attack rather than successful defense
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — closing this saṃyutta's run of loving-kindness discourses with the attacker's, not the defender's, perspective

Why this discourse

This discourse closes the loving-kindness sequence with an image of futile attack: a man who tries to fold, crumple, and bend back a sharp-pointed spear using only his hand or fist will only exhaust and frustrate himself, never succeeding. In the same way, the Buddha says, a non-human spirit who tries to overthrow the mind of a mendicant who has developed loving-kindness will only wear itself out, never achieving its aim.

Reading guide

The attacker's exhaustion, not the target's endurance, as the focus

Rather than describing loving-kindness as a shield that absorbs or deflects attack, this discourse describes what happens to the attacker itself — futile effort against something genuinely resistant leads only to the attacker's own weariness and frustration.

A precise, physically absurd task named in full

The specific verbs — fold over, crumple, bend back — describe an obviously impossible feat with bare hands against a rigid, sharp implement, making the futility vivid and immediate rather than abstractly stated.

A rhetorical question confirming the obvious before the point lands

The Buddha asks directly whether the man attempting this task is capable of succeeding, and the mendicants' answer — no, because it isn't easy and he'll only grow weary — supplies the reasoning the subsequent comparison depends on.

Loving-kindness described through its effect on an opponent

This discourse doesn't describe what loving-kindness feels like to cultivate or what benefit it brings the practitioner directly; it describes only its consequence for something attempting to disrupt it, a narrower and more specific claim than SN 20.3-4's broader framing.

Closing a three-part case for loving-kindness's exceptional value

Having established loving-kindness as protection (SN 20.3) and as more fruitful than massive generosity (SN 20.4), this discourse closes the sequence by describing its effect specifically on hostile effort, completing a layered case built across three distinct angles.

Key terms

satti tiṇhaphalā — “a sharp-pointed spear” — this discourse's title image, a rigid implement obviously impossible to reshape by hand.
paṭileṇissāmi paṭikoṭṭissāmi paṭivaṭṭessāmi — “I'll fold it over, crumple it, and bend it back” — the man's stated but physically absurd intention, named in full rather than only implied.
kilamathassa vighātassa bhāgī — “get weary and frustrated” — the outcome for both the man attempting the impossible and the spirit attempting to disrupt a mind established in loving-kindness.
cittaṁ khipitabbaṁ maññeyya — “think to overthrow their mind” — naming the specific hostile intention this discourse describes as futile.
mettācetovimutti bhāvitā bahulīkatā … — the same six-part formula for developed loving-kindness repeated from SN 20.3-4, closing this run's third and final discourse.

The text

The discourse in full. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “Mendicants, suppose there was a sharp-pointed spear. And a man came along and thought, ‘With my hand or fist I’ll fold this sharp spear over, crumple it, and bend it back!’ What do you think, mendicants? Is that man capable of doing so?” “No, sir. Why not? Because it’s not easy to fold that sharp spear over, crumple it, and bend it back with the hand or fist. That man will eventually get weary and frustrated.”

§2“In the same way, suppose a mendicant has developed the heart’s release by love, has cultivated it, made it a vehicle and a basis, kept it up, consolidated it, and properly implemented it. Should any non-human think to overthrow their mind, they’ll eventually get weary and frustrated. So you should train like this: ‘We will develop the heart’s release by love. We’ll cultivate it, make it our vehicle and our basis, keep it up, consolidate it, and properly implement it.’ That’s how you should train.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What impossible task does the man in this discourse attempt?
Correct: A. A physically absurd feat, named in full detail rather than only implied.
Question 2 of 10
What is the focus of this discourse's comparison — the attacker or the target?
Correct: A. Describing what happens to the one attempting futile effort, not describing loving-kindness as a shield.
Question 3 of 10
What confirms the man's task is impossible before the comparison is drawn?
Correct: A. The mendicants' answer supplies the reasoning the comparison depends on.
Question 4 of 10
What happens to a spirit that tries to overthrow the mind of someone established in loving-kindness?
Correct: A. The same futile exhaustion described for the man and the spear.
Question 5 of 10
Does this discourse describe what loving-kindness feels like to the practitioner directly?
Correct: A. A narrower, more specific claim than SN 20.3-4's broader framing.
Question 6 of 10
What position does this discourse hold in the three-part sequence on loving-kindness?
Correct: A. Following protection (SN 20.3) and fruitfulness (SN 20.4) with the effect on hostile effort.
Question 7 of 10
What closing formula does this discourse repeat from SN 20.3-4?
Correct: A. Closing this run's third and final discourse with the same shared instruction.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. The setting shared throughout most of this saṃyutta.
Question 9 of 10
Who participates in this discourse's exchange?
Correct: A. A question posed and answered before the comparison is drawn.
Question 10 of 10
What numbering tag closes this discourse?
Correct: A. The fifth discourse of this saṃyutta.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0