Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.108

Ascetics (2nd)

Dutiyasamaṇabrāhmaṇasutta — Antavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants
Form
The same contrastive pair as SN 22.107, expanded from a triad to five points and given an explicit stake
Length
Short — still heavily elided, but fuller than its companion
Northern parallel
The "goal of ascetic life" (sāmaññattha) formula recurs elsewhere in similar contrastive contexts
Difficulty
Approachable — best read directly after SN 22.107

Why this discourse

Directly expands SN 22.107's bare two-sentence contrast: the triad grows to five points — origin and disappearance added to gratification, drawback, and escape — and the discourse now names what is actually at stake in failing or succeeding: whether one realizes "the goal of life as an ascetic or brahmin" at all.

Reading guide

From three points to five

Where SN 22.107 named only gratification, drawback, and escape, this discourse adds origin and disappearance to the list: "these five grasping aggregates' origin, disappearance, gratification, drawback, and escape" — the fuller five-point analysis found in its complete form elsewhere in this book.

What failure actually costs

Ascetics and brahmins who don't truly understand these five points "don't realize the goal of life as an ascetic or brahmin" — naming explicitly what SN 22.107 left entirely unstated: understanding the aggregates this way is not an optional refinement but the very point of the ascetic or brahmin life itself.

This reframes religious practice generally — not only the Buddha's own path — around a single measurable criterion: whether this specific five-point understanding of the aggregates has actually been reached.

What success looks like

Those who do truly understand "realize the goal of life as an ascetic or brahmin, and live having realized it with their own insight" — success is not merely believing correctly, but a lived, self-verified realization (sacchikatvā, "having realized with one's own eyes") rather than something taken on another's authority.

A pair completing itself

Read together, SN 22.107 and SN 22.108 move from a bare structural contrast to a fully consequential one: first the shape of the distinction (understanding or not), then its content (five points, not three) and its stake (the entire goal of the ascetic or brahmin life) — a compressed pair achieving in two short discourses what elsewhere in Khandhavagga takes considerably longer to state.

Key terms

sāmaññattha — the goal of life as an ascetic — what is realized or missed depending on this understanding
samudaya — origin — the first of the two points added to SN 22.107's triad
atthaṅgama — disappearance — the second added point, paired with origin
sacchikatvā — having realized with one's own insight — the lived, self-verified nature of the successful case
brāhmañña — the state or goal of a brahmin — paired throughout with sāmañña, the ascetic's own goal

The text

The complete discourse, expanding SN 22.107's triad to five points and naming what is at stake in each case. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “Mendicants, there are these five grasping aggregates. What five? That is, the grasping aggregates of form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness.

§2There are ascetics and brahmins who don’t truly understand these five grasping aggregates’ origin, disappearance, gratification, drawback, and escape … Those venerables don’t realize the goal of life as an ascetic or brahmin …

§3There are ascetics and brahmins who do truly understand … Those venerables realize the goal of life as an ascetic or brahmin, and live having realized it with their own insight.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does this discourse expand on SN 22.107's triad?
Correct: A. Origin and disappearance are added to gratification, drawback, and escape.
Question 2 of 10
What is explicitly at stake in failing to understand these five points?
Correct: A. Named explicitly here, where SN 22.107 left it entirely unstated.
Question 3 of 10
How does the discourse describe successful understanding?
Correct: A. A lived, self-verified realization, not merely correct belief.
Question 4 of 10
What does this discourse reframe religious practice around?
Correct: A. Applied generally to ascetics and brahmins, not only to the Buddha's own path.
Question 5 of 10
How do SN 22.107 and SN 22.108 relate when read together?
Correct: A. The pair achieves in two short discourses what elsewhere takes much longer to state.
Question 6 of 10
What are the five points named in this discourse's analysis?
Correct: A. The fuller five-point analysis of the five grasping aggregates.
Question 7 of 10
What does "sacchikatvā" specifically emphasize about the successful case?
Correct: A. "Having realized with one's own insight" — a personally verified attainment.
Question 8 of 10
Which two categories of practitioners does this discourse discuss?
Correct: A. The same paired category as SN 22.107.
Question 9 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Matching SN 22.107's own setting.
Question 10 of 10
What comes next in Antavagga after this pair of discourses?
Correct: A. Moving to the next stage in the vagga's progression through the four stages of awakening.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0