Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.122

An Ethical Mendicant

Sīlasutta — Dhammakathikavagga

Setting
Varanasi, in the deer park at Isipatana
Speakers
Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita questioning Venerable Sāriputta
Form
A five-round dialogue, each round following an identical question-and-answer structure
Length
Long — the most extended dialogue in this vagga
Northern parallel
The eleven-angled reflection formula (impermanent, suffering, diseased, a boil, a dart...) recurs across the Canon in similar contexts of progressive practice
Difficulty
Moderate — the five-round structure is repetitive by design and rewards tracking what changes (the practitioner's stage) against what stays constant (the reflection itself)

Why this discourse

A rare extended dialogue between two of the Buddha's own chief disciples, set at Isipatana — the deer park where the Buddha first taught. Mahākoṭṭhita asks the same question five times, advancing through the four stages of awakening one at a time, and Sāriputta's answer is, each time, the identical eleven-angled reflection on the five grasping aggregates.

Reading guide

Two chief disciples, a specific setting

"Venerable Sāriputta and Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita were staying near Varanasi, in the deer park at Isipatana" — the same location where the Buddha delivered his first sermon (referenced elsewhere in this book at SN 22.59), now the setting for a dialogue between two senior monks rather than the Buddha himself.

Mahākoṭṭhita comes "out of retreat" specifically to pose this question, suggesting it arose from his own sustained meditative reflection rather than idle curiosity.

The eleven-angled reflection

Sāriputta's answer, repeated identically at every stage: the five grasping aggregates should be rationally applied to "as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self" — eleven distinct angles, far exceeding the three-mark formula (impermanent, suffering, not-self) used more commonly elsewhere in this book.

The additional eight angles — diseased, a boil, a dart, gloom, an affliction, alien, breaking apart, empty — supply a richer, more visceral vocabulary for the same underlying insight, moving from abstract philosophical categories (impermanent, not-self) to embodied, even painful images (diseased, a dart, a boil).

Five rounds, one constant answer, an advancing subject

Mahākoṭṭhita asks what an "ethical mendicant" should reflect on; then, in turn, what a stream-enterer, a once-returner, a non-returner, and finally a perfected one should reflect on — five distinct practitioners at progressively higher stages, yet Sāriputta gives the identical eleven-angled answer every single time.

Each round names what the reflection makes possible for that stage: an ethical mendicant may realize stream-entry; a stream-enterer, once-return; a once-returner, non-return; a non-returner, perfection — the reflection itself never changes, but what it opens onto advances with the practitioner.

Why even the arahant continues this reflection

The final round breaks the escalating pattern: asked what a perfected one should reflect on, Sāriputta gives the same eleven angles, then adds explicitly, "a perfected one has nothing more to do, and nothing that needs improvement. Still, these things, when developed and cultivated, lead to blissful meditation in this life, and also to mindfulness and situational awareness."

This final clarification prevents a natural but mistaken inference — that the reflection is merely instrumental, to be discarded once its goal is reached. Instead, the identical practice continues even after nothing further needs to be attained, valued now for its own immediate benefits rather than as a means to a further end.

Key terms

sīlavā bhikkhu — an ethical mendicant — the first practitioner named, whose ethical grounding is the basis for this reflection
yoniso manasikāra — rationally applying the mind — the specific cognitive act Mahākoṭṭhita asks about at each stage
gaṇḍa/salla/agha/ābādha — a boil, a dart, gloom, an affliction — four of the eleven angles, supplying visceral rather than abstract imagery
suñña — empty — one of the eleven angles, appearing here in a list otherwise dominated by the three-mark vocabulary
diṭṭhadhammasukhavihāra — blissful meditation in this life — one of the two benefits named for the arahant's continued reflection

The text

The complete five-round dialogue between Mahākoṭṭhita and Sāriputta, given in full for each of the five stages. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time Venerable Sāriputta and Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita were staying near Varanasi, in the deer park at Isipatana. Then in the late afternoon, Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita came out of retreat, went to Venerable Sāriputta, and said: “Reverend Sāriputta, what things should an ethical mendicant rationally apply the mind to?” “Reverend Koṭṭhita, an ethical mendicant should rationally apply the mind to the five grasping aggregates as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self.

§2What five? That is, the grasping aggregates of form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness. An ethical mendicant should rationally apply the mind to these five grasping aggregates as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self. It’s possible that an ethical mendicant who rationally applies the mind to the five grasping aggregates will realize the fruit of stream-entry.”

§3“But Reverend Sāriputta, what things should a mendicant stream-enterer rationally apply the mind to?” “A mendicant stream-enterer should also rationally apply the mind to these five grasping aggregates as impermanent … as not-self. It’s possible that a mendicant stream-enterer who rationally applies the mind to the five grasping aggregates will realize the fruit of once-return.”

§4“But Reverend Sāriputta, what things should a mendicant once-returner rationally apply the mind to?” “A mendicant once-returner should also rationally apply the mind to these five grasping aggregates as impermanent … as not-self. It’s possible that a mendicant once-returner who rationally applies the mind to the five grasping aggregates will realize the fruit of non-return.”

§5“But Reverend Sāriputta, what things should a mendicant non-returner rationally apply the mind to?” “A mendicant non-returner should also rationally apply the mind to these five grasping aggregates as impermanent … as not-self. It’s possible that a mendicant non-returner who rationally applies the mind to the five grasping aggregates will realize perfection.”

§6“But Reverend Sāriputta, what things should a perfected one rationally apply the mind to?” “Reverend Koṭṭhita, a perfected one should also rationally apply the mind to the five grasping aggregates as impermanent, as suffering, as diseased, as a boil, as a dart, as gloom, as an affliction, as alien, as breaking apart, as empty, as not-self. A perfected one has nothing more to do, and nothing that needs improvement. Still, these things, when developed and cultivated, lead to blissful meditation in this life, and also to mindfulness and situational awareness.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. The same deer park where the Buddha delivered his first sermon.
Question 2 of 10
Who are the two speakers in this dialogue?
Correct: A. A dialogue between two senior monks, not involving the Buddha directly.
Question 3 of 10
How many distinct angles does Sāriputta's reflection formula include?
Correct: A. Far exceeding the more common three-mark formula used elsewhere in this book.
Question 4 of 10
Which of these is one of the eleven angles?
Correct: A. One of eight additional, more visceral images beyond the standard three marks.
Question 5 of 10
How many times does Mahākoṭṭhita ask essentially the same question?
Correct: A. For the ethical mendicant, the stream-enterer, the once-returner, the non-returner, and the arahant.
Question 6 of 10
Does Sāriputta's answer change across the five rounds?
Correct: A. What advances is the practitioner's stage, not the reflection itself.
Question 7 of 10
What is said to be possible for an ethical mendicant who practices this reflection?
Correct: A. Each stage's reflection opens onto the next stage of awakening.
Question 8 of 10
Why does a perfected one (arahant) still continue this same reflection?
Correct: A. Preventing the inference that the reflection is merely instrumental and should be discarded once its goal is reached.
Question 9 of 10
What prompts Mahākoṭṭhita to ask his question?
Correct: A. Suggesting a question born from meditative practice rather than idle curiosity.
Question 10 of 10
How does this discourse's eleven-angled formula differ in character from the standard three-mark formula?
Correct: A. Diseased, a boil, a dart, gloom, and affliction add a richer, more visceral vocabulary.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0