Reading guide
A simpler formula opening a second cluster
Where SN 22.63-65 built their formula around Māra's dominion, this discourse strips the instruction down to its plainest form: give up desire for whatever's impermanent. No adversarial figure is named; the instruction addresses the aggregates' nature directly.
An echo of Aniccavagga's own opening move
This formula's content directly recalls SN 22.12's opening claim in Aniccavagga — the aggregates are impermanent — but delivered here through the narrative frame of a mendicant's request and confirmed explanation, rather than as a direct teaching addressed to the assembly. The same doctrinal content is given a second, differently structured presentation.
The mendicant's own reasoning, stated as a personal resolution
In his confirmed explanation, the mendicant states each aggregate's impermanence and his own resulting resolution in the first person: “form is impermanent; I should give up desire for it.” This first-person framing, rather than a third-person description of what a learned noble disciple does, gives this cluster's discourses a more personally applied character than SN 22.12's original third-person statement.
Opening a quartet that will run through impermanence, suffering, not-self, and one further term
This discourse begins a set of four (SN 22.66-69) that will substitute impermanence, then suffering, then not-self, then “not belonging to self” — a related but distinct fourth term not identical to not-self itself — each fitted into the identical “give up desire for X” formula.
Key terms
The text
§1Then a mendicant went up to the Buddha … and asked him, “Sir, may the Buddha please teach me Dhamma in brief. When I’ve heard it, I’ll live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute.” “Mendicant, give up desire for whatever’s impermanent.” “Understood, Blessed One! Understood, Holy One!”
§2“But how do you see the detailed meaning of my brief statement?” “Sir, form is impermanent; I should give up desire for it.
§3Consciousness is impermanent; I should give up desire for it. That’s how I understand the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement.”
§4“Good, good, mendicant! It’s good that you understand the detailed meaning of what I’ve said in brief like this. Form is impermanent; you should give up desire for it.
§5Consciousness is impermanent; you should give up desire for it. This is how to understand the detailed meaning of what I said in brief.” … And that mendicant became one of the perfected.
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.