Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.67

Suffering

Dukkhasutta — Arahantavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
An unnamed mendicant requests a teaching in brief, then explains it back to the Buddha
Form
The identical narrative template as SN 22.66, with "suffering" substituted for "impermanent"
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — the second term of this vagga's four-part quartet

Why this discourse

This discourse continues the quartet SN 22.66 opened, substituting suffering for impermanence in the identical formula: give up desire for whatever's suffering. The mendicant's confirmed explanation follows suit — form is suffering, I should give up desire for it — run through each aggregate in turn, closing with the same arahantship outcome shared by every discourse in this vagga so far.

Reading guide

The second term of the quartet, everything else unchanged

As with every discourse from SN 22.63 onward, only the central term changes: suffering (dukkha) now stands where impermanence stood in SN 22.66. The request, the confirmation pattern, and the closing attainment all remain exactly as before.

A direct claim, not derived from impermanence

As in SN 22.13's earlier direct statement in Aniccavagga, this discourse states that the aggregates are suffering without first deriving that claim from their impermanence — a direct assertion granted on its own terms, matching the pattern of this vagga's quartet presenting each mark independently rather than building a logical chain between them.

The mendicant's resolution stated for suffering specifically

The mendicant's confirmed explanation states, for each aggregate: it is suffering, and I should give up desire for it. This first-person resolution format, established in SN 22.66, continues here without variation, giving each discourse in the quartet the same personally applied character.

Two terms down, two remaining

With impermanence (SN 22.66) and suffering (this discourse) both now given, the quartet has two terms remaining: not-self in SN 22.68, and “not belonging to self” in SN 22.69, before the vagga moves to its eighth and final matched-template discourse.

Key terms

dukkha — “suffering” — the term substituted for anicca (impermanent) in this discourse, the second term of the quartet.
chandaṁ pajahatha — “give up desire” — the same formula from SN 22.66, unchanged in wording.
pajahitabbo me chando — “I should give up desire for it” — the mendicant's first-person resolution, now applied to suffering specifically.
saṅkhittena — “in brief” — the mendicant's request, unchanged from earlier discourses in this vagga.
arahataṁ ahosi — “became one of the perfected” — the identical outcome closing this discourse.

The text

The discourse in full. Elided repetitions (feeling, perception, and choices, each following the same formula spelled out in full for form and consciousness) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1Then a mendicant went up to the Buddha … and asked him, “Sir, may the Buddha please teach me Dhamma in brief. When I’ve heard it, I’ll live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute.” “Mendicant, give up desire for whatever’s suffering.” “Understood, Blessed One! Understood, Holy One!”

§2“But how do you see the detailed meaning of my brief statement?” “Sir, form is suffering; I should give up desire for it.

§3Consciousness is suffering; I should give up desire for it. That’s how I understand the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement.”

§4“Good, good, mendicant! It’s good that you understand the detailed meaning of what I’ve said in brief like this. Form is suffering; you should give up desire for it.

§5Consciousness is suffering; you should give up desire for it. This is how to understand the detailed meaning of what I said in brief.” … And that mendicant became one of the perfected.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What term does this discourse substitute for SN 22.66's "impermanent"?
Correct: A. The second term of the quartet opened by SN 22.66.
Question 2 of 10
Does this discourse derive suffering from impermanence, or state it directly?
Correct: A. Matching the pattern of SN 22.13's earlier direct statement in Aniccavagga.
Question 3 of 10
How does the mendicant's resolution read for this discourse?
Correct: A. The same first-person resolution format established in SN 22.66.
Question 4 of 10
What two terms remain in the quartet after this discourse?
Correct: A. Completing the set of four before the vagga's eighth matched discourse.
Question 5 of 10
How does the Buddha respond to the mendicant's explanation?
Correct: A. The same confirmation pattern used throughout this vagga.
Question 6 of 10
What outcome closes this discourse?
Correct: A. Identical to every other discourse in this matched set.
Question 7 of 10
How many aggregates does the formula apply to?
Correct: A. Feeling, perception, and choices are elided but follow the same pattern.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Continuing the same setting as the vagga's earlier discourses.
Question 9 of 10
What does the mendicant request at the discourse's start?
Correct: A. Identical framing to earlier discourses in this vagga.
Question 10 of 10
What discourse comes immediately after this one?
Correct: A. The third term of the quartet.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0