Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 22.89

With Khemaka

Khemakasutta — Theravagga

Setting
Kosambī, Ghosita's Monastery, and the Jujube Tree Monastery
Speakers
Senior mendicants question the ill Venerable Khemaka through a relayed messenger, then in person
Form
A relayed dialogue escalating in precision, closing in two similes and a mass awakening
Length
~7 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★★ — one of the most philosophically precise discourses in the entire aggregates literature

Why this discourse

This discourse gives the canon's clearest account of a genuine puzzle in the spiritual path: how can a disciple have given up identity view — no longer regarding any aggregate as self or as belonging to self — and yet not be a fully liberated arahant? Venerable Khemaka, gravely ill, is questioned through a relay of messages by senior mendicants at Kosambī, and his answer distinguishes, with striking precision, between intellectually rejecting self-view and the far subtler, lingering conceit “I am” that a noble disciple can carry for some time even after the five lower fetters are gone. Two justly famous similes — a lotus's scent, and a freshly laundered cloth — carry the discourse's central distinction, which closes with sixty senior mendicants and Khemaka himself all attaining full liberation.

Reading guide

A relayed conversation, growing testier by the exchange

Too ill to travel, Khemaka is questioned through Venerable Dāsaka, who carries each question and answer back and forth between Khemaka's dwelling and the senior mendicants. After several rounds, Khemaka's patience visibly runs out: “enough, Reverend Dāsaka! What's the point in running back and forth? Bring my staff, I'll go to see the senior mendicants myself” — a small, human touch of irritation from a gravely ill man determined to be understood correctly.

Not self, not belonging to self — and yet not an arahant

Khemaka's first clear answer already unsettles a simple equation: he does not regard anything among the five grasping aggregates as self or as belonging to self — which the seniors reasonably take to mean he must be a perfected one. Khemaka corrects them directly: “I am not a perfected one…for when it comes to the five grasping aggregates I'm not rid of the conceit 'I am'. But I don't regard anything as 'I am this'.”

A scent belonging to the whole flower, not any one part

Pressed on what exactly he means by “I am” — is it form, or apart from form, and likewise for each aggregate — Khemaka answers with neither, for any aggregate. He then offers the discourse's first simile: would it be right to say the scent of a lotus belongs to its petals, its stalk, or its pistil specifically? No — it would be right to say the scent belongs to the flower as a whole. The lingering “I am” conceit relates to the five aggregates the same way — not locatable in any single one, yet not separate from all of them together.

A cloth washed clean, still faintly scented until stored away

Khemaka's second simile addresses how this lingering residue is finally eradicated: a dirty cloth, thoroughly kneaded with salt, lye, and cow dung and rinsed clean, may look and be genuinely clean, yet still carry a faint lingering scent of what cleaned it — until it is stored in a fragrant casket, and that trace, too, finally disappears. A noble disciple who has given up the five lower fetters, Khemaka says, similarly retains a lingering residue of the conceit, desire, and underlying tendency “I am”, eradicated only through continued meditation observing the rise and fall of the five grasping aggregates over time. The discourse closes with the senior mendicants' own gratitude, and the striking detail that while Khemaka was explaining this, sixty senior mendicants and Khemaka himself were all freed from the defilements by not grasping.

Key terms

asmimāna — “the conceit 'I am'” — the discourse's central subject, distinguished sharply from the self-identification (sakkāyadiṭṭhi) already given up.
na kho panāhaṁ…asmī'ti pi na samanupassāmi — “I don't regard anything as 'I am this'” — Khemaka's precise formula distinguishing the lingering conceit from any specific self-identification.
gandho, na cassa vaṇṭagato…pupphagato tveva — “the scent belongs to the flower” — the discourse's first simile, locating “I am” in the aggregates as a whole rather than in any single one.
gandhajātaṁ anuvāyeyya — “a lingering scent…not yet eradicated” — the residue that remains in the laundered cloth simile even after genuine cleanliness is achieved.
udayabbayānupassī — “meditating observing rise and fall” — the specific ongoing practice that finally eradicates the lingering residue, described in both similes' explanations.

The text

The discourse in full, including both similes. Elided repetitions across the relayed dialogue (feeling, perception, and choices, spelled out in full for form and consciousness where the source does so) are given exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Enough, Reverend Dāsaka! What’s the point in running back and forth? Bring my staff, I’ll go to see the senior mendicants myself.”

§2When you say ‘I am’, what is it that you’re talking about?”

§3“Reverends, I don’t say ‘I am’ with reference to form, or apart from form. I don’t say ‘I am’ with reference to feeling … perception … choices … consciousness, or apart from consciousness. For when it comes to the five grasping aggregates I’m not rid of the conceit ‘I am’. But I don’t regard anything as ‘I am this’.

§4It’s like the scent of a blue water lily, or a pink or white lotus. Would it be right to say that the scent belongs to the petals or the stalk or the pistil?” “No, reverend.” “Then, reverends, how should it be said?” “It would be right to say that the scent belongs to the flower.” “In the same way, reverends, I don’t say ‘I am’ with reference to form, or apart from form.

§5Although a noble disciple has given up the five lower fetters, they still have a lingering residue of the conceit ‘I am’, the desire ‘I am’, and the underlying tendency ‘I am’ which has not been eradicated. After some time they meditate observing rise and fall in the five grasping aggregates. ‘Such is form, such is the origin of form, such is the ending of form. Such is feeling … Such is perception … Such are choices … Such is consciousness, such is the origin of consciousness, such is the disappearance of consciousness.’ As they do so, that lingering residue is eradicated.

§6Suppose there was a cloth that was dirty and soiled, so the owners give it to a launderer. The launderer kneads it thoroughly with salt, lye, and cow dung, and rinses it in clear water. Although that cloth is clean and bright, it still has a lingering scent of salt, lye, or cow dung that had not been eradicated. The launderer returns it to its owners, who store it in a fragrant casket. And that lingering scent would be eradicated. In the same way, although a noble disciple has given up the five lower fetters, they still have a lingering residue of the conceit ‘I am’, the desire ‘I am’, and the underlying tendency ‘I am’ which has not been eradicated. After some time they meditate observing rise and fall in the five grasping aggregates. ‘Such is form, such is the origin of form, such is the disappearance of form. Such is feeling … Such is perception … Such are choices … Such is consciousness, such is the origin of consciousness, such is the disappearance of consciousness.’ As they do so, that lingering residue is eradicated.”

§7That’s what Venerable Khemaka said. Satisfied, the senior mendicants approved what Venerable Khemaka said. And while this discourse was being spoken, the minds of sixty senior mendicants and of Venerable Khemaka were freed from defilements by not grasping.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What causes Khemaka to abandon the relayed messenger and visit the senior mendicants himself?
Correct: A. "Enough, Reverend Dāsaka! What's the point in running back and forth?"
Question 2 of 10
What distinction does Khemaka draw between having given up self-view and being a full arahant?
Correct: A. A precise distinction between intellectual self-identification and a subtler lingering conceit.
Question 3 of 10
What does the lotus-scent simile illustrate?
Correct: A. Just as a lotus's scent belongs to the whole flower, not to any one part.
Question 4 of 10
What does the laundered-cloth simile illustrate?
Correct: A. The residue is eradicated gradually, through continued meditation observing the aggregates' rise and fall.
Question 5 of 10
What practice does Khemaka name as finally eradicating this lingering residue?
Correct: A. Described in both similes' explanations as an ongoing, gradual process.
Question 6 of 10
What happens at the discourse's close?
Correct: A. A striking mass liberation occurring while the teaching itself was being given.
Question 7 of 10
How is Khemaka questioned for most of the discourse?
Correct: A. Due to his grave illness, until he finally decides to go see the seniors himself.
Question 8 of 10
What term names the lingering quality Khemaka has not yet eradicated?
Correct: A. Sharply distinguished from the self-view already given up.
Question 9 of 10
How many aggregates does Khemaka's analysis apply to?
Correct: A. The questioning runs across all five before either simile is introduced.
Question 10 of 10
Where is this discourse primarily set?
Correct: A. Two nearby locations connected by the relayed messages between Khemaka and the seniors.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0